Enterprise-Record (Chico)

Abortion foes eye priorities as high court ruling looms

- By Thomas Beaumont

In the nearly two months since a conservati­ve majority of justices on the Supreme Court indicated openness to dramatic new restrictio­ns on abortion, money has poured into the political fundraisin­g arm of the anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony List.

The organizati­on secured $20 million in pledged financial contributi­ons, five times more than it has had at the outset of an election year over its 30-year history, according to figures shared with The Associated Press. Before the recent surge, the group had already signed off on its largest-ever political budget, $72 million, for 2022. That’s nearly $20 million more than it spent in 2020, a year that included a presidenti­al election.

The cash pile virtually guarantees that the Supreme Court’s abortion ruling, anticipate­d by the summer, will do little to quell what has become one of the most animating issues in the United States. Abortion opponents say they will pump their newfound resources into the November elections.

Once a decision is issued, “there will be a lot of focus on all the states and the midterm elections,” said Marjorie Dannenfels­er, the president of Susan B. Anthony List.

Court case

The Supreme Court is considerin­g a Mississipp­i law that bans abortions after 15 weeks. If the law is upheld, anti-abortion activists said much of the attention would shift to Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvan­ia and Kansas. These are states with Republican legislatur­es but Democrats in the governorsh­ip, each of whom is up for election in November.

If the Supreme Court overturns the Roe v. Wade ruling that women have a constituti­onal right to an abortion, governors in Michigan and Wisconsin would be powerless to overturn restrictio­ns in their states that were already in place before the 1973 decision.

But these governors would be the only obstacle to new measures passed by GOP legislatur­es, including outright bans on the procedure. A Supreme Court decision is “really just the beginning of the work,” said Terry Schilling, president of the socially conservati­ve American Principles Project. “Groups have actually been really well-connected with state leaders and investing in campaigns at the local level in these swing states, trying to win control in divided government­s.”

Sense of alarm

Supporters of abortion rights, already feeling a heightened sense of alarm by the prospect of a defeat at the Supreme Court, are well aware of how important the governors’ races may be to their cause.

“Really truly, governors in many states are going to be our backstop,” said Jenny Lawson, vice president of organizing and electoral campaigns for Planned Parenthood Action Fund. “As the decisions come down to the states, these governors are the ones who can protect access.”

She declined to specify how much money the group was budgeting to support candidates who back abortion rights.

Some of the Democratic governors up for reelection are increasing­ly highlighti­ng their commitment to protecting some form of access.

“And as long as I’m governor, that’s what I’ll do,” Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers said during a news conference last week marking the 49th anniversar­y of the Roe decision.

“I’m proud to stand with so many Michigande­rs to protect the right to safe and legal abortion,” Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer tweeted last week on the same day organizers of a ballot drive to enshrine abortion rights in the state constituti­on cleared a procedural step. Over the weekend, Whitmer tweeted that the right to abortion “hangs by a thread” in the Supreme Court.

For their part, abortion opponents are undeniably upbeat as the Supreme Court decision nears. Thousands gathered on a bitterly cold day in Washington last week for the March for Life, expressing joy and optimism about the prospect of Roe being overturned.

But the political fallout from such a move could be volatile for both parties. A decision drasticall­y reducing access to abortion could energize Democrats heading into the fall campaign.

The issue is already rising in priority for Democrats, according to a December poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. The poll found that 13% of Democrats listed abortion or reproducti­ve rights as an issue they want the federal government to address. That’s up from less than 1% of Democrats who named it as a priority for 2021 and 3% who listed it in 2020.

 ?? DANA VERKOUTERE­N ?? This artist sketch depicts Marc Hearron, petitioner for Whole Woman’s Health, standing while speaking to the Supreme Court in Washington. Seated to Hearron’s left is Judd Stone II, Texas Solicitor General. Justices seated from left are Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Samuel Alito, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justice Stephen Breyer, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associated Justice Neil Gorsuch and Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett.
DANA VERKOUTERE­N This artist sketch depicts Marc Hearron, petitioner for Whole Woman’s Health, standing while speaking to the Supreme Court in Washington. Seated to Hearron’s left is Judd Stone II, Texas Solicitor General. Justices seated from left are Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Samuel Alito, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justice Stephen Breyer, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associated Justice Neil Gorsuch and Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States