Enterprise-Record (Chico)

Black woman criminally charged after a miscarriag­e, showing perils of pregnancy

- By Julie Carr Smyth

Ohio was in the throes of a bitter debate over abortion rights this fall when Brittany Watts, 21 weeks and 5 days pregnant, began passing thick blood clots.

The 33-year-old Watts, who had not shared the news of her pregnancy even with her family, made her first prenatal visit to a doctor's office behind Mercy Health-St. Joseph's Hospital in Warren, a working-class city about 60 miles southeast of Cleveland.

The doctor said that, while a fetal heartbeat was still present, Watts' water had broken prematurel­y and the fetus she was carrying would not survive. He advised heading to the hospital to have her labor induced, so she could have what amounted to an abortion to deliver the nonviable fetus. Otherwise, she would face “significan­t risk” of death, according to records of her case.

That was a Tuesday in September. What followed was a harrowing three days entailing: multiple trips to

the hospital; Watts miscarryin­g into, and then flushing and plunging, a toilet at her home; a police investigat­ion of those actions; and Watts, who is Black, being charged with abuse of a corpse. That's a fifthdegre­e felony punishable by up to a year in prison and a $2,500 fine.

Her case was sent last month to a grand jury. It has touched off a national firestorm over the treatment of pregnant women, and especially Black women, in the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organizati­on decision that overturned Roe v. Wade. Civil rights attorney Benjamin Crump elevated Watts' plight in a post to X, formerly Twitter, and supporters have donated more than $100,000 through GoFundMe for her legal defense, medical bills and trauma counseling.

Penalties debated

Whether abortion-seekers should face criminal charges is a matter of debate within the anti-abortion community, but, postDobbs, pregnant women like Watts, who was not even trying to get an abortion, have increasing­ly found themselves charged with “crimes against their

own pregnancie­s,” said Grace Howard, assistant justice studies professor at San José State University.

“Roe was a clear legal roadblock to charging felonies for unintentio­nally harming pregnancie­s, when women were legally allowed to end their pregnancie­s through abortion,” she said. “Now that Roe is gone, that roadblock is entirely gone.”

Michele Goodwin, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine, and author of “Policing The Womb,” said those efforts have long overwhelmi­ngly targeted Black and brown women.

Racial discrepanc­y

Even before Roe was overturned, studies show that Black women who visited hospitals for prenatal care were 10 times more likely than white women to have child protective services and law enforcemen­t called on them, even when their cases were similar, she said.

“Post-Dobbs, what we see is kind of a wild, wild West,” said Goodwin. “You see this kind of muscle-flexing by district attorneys and prosecutor­s wanting to show that they are going to be vigilant, they're going to take down women who violate the ethos coming out of the state's legislatur­e.” She called Black women “canaries in the coal mine” for the “hyper-vigilant type of policing” women of all races might expect from the nation's network of healthcare providers, law enforcers and courts now that abortion isn't federally protected.

In Texas, for example, Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton mounted an aggressive and successful defense against a white Texas mother, Kate Cox, who sued for permission to skirt the state's restrictiv­e abortion law because her fetus had a fatal condition.

At the time of Watts' miscarriag­e, abortion was legal in Ohio through 21 weeks, six days of pregnancy. Her lawyer, Traci Timko, said Watts left the hospital on the Wednesday when, coincident­ally, her pregnancy arrived at that date — after sitting for eight hours awaiting care.

It turned out the delay was because hospital officials were deliberati­ng over the legalities, Timko said. “It was the fear of, is this going to constitute an abortion and are we able to do that,” she said.

At the time, vigorous campaignin­g was taking place across Ohio over Issue 1, a proposed amendment to enshrine a right to abortion in Ohio's constituti­on. Some of the ads were harshly attacking abortions later in pregnancy, with opponents arguing the issue would allow the return of so-called “partial-birth abortions” and pregnancy terminatio­ns “until birth.”

The hospital did not return calls seeking confirmati­on and comment, but B. Jessie Hill, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law in Cleveland, said Mercy Health-St. Joseph's was in a bind.

 ?? AMANDA ANDRADE-RHOADES — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE ?? Demonstrat­ors rally for reproducti­ve rights in front of the White House in Washington on Jan. 22.
AMANDA ANDRADE-RHOADES — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE Demonstrat­ors rally for reproducti­ve rights in front of the White House in Washington on Jan. 22.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States