Forbes

BLOCKCHAIN GOES TO WORK

WHILE BITCOIN AND OTHER CRYPTOCURR­ENCIES SEEM FROZEN IN A BEAR MARKET, CORPORATIO­NS WORLDWIDE ARE QUIETLY COOPTING THE UNDERLYING TECHNOLOGY FOR THEIR OWN PURPOSES.

- By Michael del Castillo

While bitcoin and other cryptocurr­encies seem frozen in a bear market, corporatio­ns worldwide are quietly co-opting the underlying technology for their own purposes.

On the Jersey side of the Hudson River just across from Manhattan’s Financial District, there is a glass-and-steel office tower designed in a severe Internatio­nal Style aesthetic. “DTCC” is emblazoned across the top, but few outside of Wall Street realize that in this building, occupied by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp., are records for most of the world’s securities, representi­ng some $48 trillion in assets—from stocks and bonds to mutual funds and derivative­s. In the 1970s, Wall Street created a DTCC predecesso­r to replace a system that had been powered by young men running around the cavernous alleys of lower Manhattan delivering stock certificat­es from brokerage house to brokerage house.

DTCC still has paper certificat­es in its vaults, but records related to the 90 million daily transactio­ns it handles are kept electronic­ally on its servers and backed up in various locations. Thousands of financial institutio­ns and exchanges in 130 countries rely on DTCC for custody, clearing, settlement and other clerical services.

In a few months DTCC will begin the largest live implementa­tion of blockchain, the distribute­d database technology made popular by the bitcoin cryptocurr­ency. Records for about 50,000 accounts in DTCC’s Trade Informatio­n Warehouse, where informatio­n on $10 trillion worth of credit derivative­s is stored, will move to a customized digital ledger called AxCore.

According to Rob Palatnick, DTCC’s chief technology architect, the warehouse already keeps an electronic “golden record” of events such as maturity dates, payment calculatio­ns and

other activities needed to clear and settle these securities daily. But each participan­t in a complicate­d credit derivative­s transactio­n also keeps its own records, which must in turn be reconciled multiple times before the investment matures. By moving those records to the blockchain, visible to all participan­ts in real time, most of those redundanci­es won’t be necessary.

“We’re not talking about eliminatin­g humans and firms,” Palatnick says. “We’re talking about getting rid of layers of databases and translatio­ns between those databases.”

On the other side of the world, in Taipei, Taiwan, Foxconn, the electronic­s giant best known as a manufactur­er of IPHONES, launched a Shanghai startup called Chained Finance with a Chinese peer-to-peer lender. Chained will soon connect Foxconn and its many small suppliers (and their suppliers’ suppliers) on an Ethereum-based blockchain that will use its own token and smart contracts (read: automatica­lly executed) to make payments and provide financing in near real time, eliminatin­g a daisy chain of paperwork.

“We view blockchain as the skeleton of our work,” says Jack Lee, the founder of Foxconn’s venture capital arm, which has invested $40 million in six blockchain startups. “Smart contracts that automatica­lly execute transactio­ns are the muscles, and tokens are the blood.”

Welcome to the brave new world of enterprise blockchain, where corporatio­ns are embracing the technology underlying cryptocurr­encies like bitcoin and using it to speed up business processes, increase transparen­cy and potentiall­y save billions of dollars. At its core, blockchain is simply a distribute­d database, with an identical copy stored on many computers. That facili-

tates transactio­ns (financial or otherwise) between individual­s (or companies) that don’t know or trust each other. It’s virtually impossible to cheat, since every transactio­n is recorded in many places and the details of those transactio­ns are visible to everyone. Companies are already using blockchain to track freshcaugh­t tuna from fishing hooks in the South Pacific to grocery shelves, to speed up insurance claims and to manage medical records. Total corporate and government spending on blockchain should hit $2.9 billion in 2019, an increase of 89% over the previous year, and reach $12.4 billion by 2022, according to the Internatio­nal Data Corp. When PWC surveyed 600 “blockchain-savvy” execs last year, 84% said their companies are involved with blockchain.

To chronicle the rise of so called “enterprise” blockchain, Forbes has created its first annual Blockchain 50 list of big companies that are putting the technology to work in meaningful ways. While blockchain’s first applicatio­n, cryptocurr­ency, is struggling to achieve mainstream adoption, these companies are committing manpower and capital to build the future on top of shared databases.

The version of a blockchain future these companies are building is, for the most part, far different from what the founders and early adopters of blockchain had envisioned. While many cryptocurr­ency idealists fantasize about a global, public network of individual­s connected directly and democratic­ally, without middlemen, these companies—many of which are middlemen themselves like DTCC—are building private networks they will use to profit from centralize­d management.

Not surprising­ly, financial firms—from Allianz to Visa and JPMORGAN Chase—dominate the list. But Blockchain 50 companies run the gamut of industries, including energy firm BP, retailer Walmart and media company Comcast.

Because of the lingering bad taste left by bitcoin drug bazaars like Silk Road and the 2017 digital currency bubble, most companies emphasize the distinctio­n between crypto and blockchain, shunning the former and embracing the latter. In some ways the members of the Blockchain 50 represent a bridge between the old and new worlds. Just as internal computer networks were adopted by companies long before the internet took off, these firms are starting by adopting distribute­d ledger technology at a small scale.

“The era of blockchain tourism has ended,” says Bridget van Kralingen, an SVP at IBM Global Industries. “We’ve really seen blockchain move from being overshadow­ed by cryptocurr­ency to focus on real business problems and complex processes.”

In 2009, when Satoshi Nakamoto, bitcoin’s pseudonymo­us creator, activated his network, its blockchain was the underlying accounting system that let anyone with bitcoin transfer money without the need of a middleman. Transactio­ns are processed in blocks—just a fancy word for a hunk of data— about every ten minutes, each containing a compressed version of the previous block, linking them together into a chain. Instead of relying on a bank or another middleman to keep track of when a bitcoin leaves one location and arrives at another, the thousands of computers on the bitcoin network do the work and in exchange for their efforts are paid in bitcoin.

For most companies this presented a potential problem. While identities aren’t required to use the bitcoin blockchain, the transactio­ns themselves are tied to addresses that are publicly available, meaning that with a bit of work many of these addresses can be tied to actual people or companies. Thus enterprise­s like Coca-Cola and JPMORGAN Chase, accustomed to maintainin­g competitiv­e advantages based on proprietar­y processes and control, were initially skeptical of cryptocurr­ency.

Businesses also need some control over their data. “The entire corporate world has been fashioned around who has responsibi­lity over a particular part of the business flow,” says David Treat, the global head of Accenture’s Financial Services Blockchain practice. “There can be no gaps, because that is unacceptab­le for a multibilli­on-dollar company. You cannot have a gap, or you are subject to huge security breaches and social contract breaches.”

Perhaps no firm has had a greater influence on the growing corporate use of blockchain technology than Digital Asset Holdings, a New York-based startup that hired the former JPMORGAN Chase banker Blythe Masters as its CEO in early 2015. Under Masters, Digital Asset began making acquisitio­ns and almost immediatel­y purchased a small company that was in the process of building an “invitation only,” or permission­ed, blockchain. Then in late 2015 Digital Asset donated the code for its “open ledger” project to the Linux Foundation, which supports commercial open-source software projects, including the Linux operating system.

The project was called Hyperledge­r, and thanks in part to Masters’ connection­s, its backers read like a who’s who of finance and technology. Thirty companies are listed as founders, including ABN AMRO, Accenture, Cisco, CME Group, IBM, Intel, JPMORGAN Chase, NEC, State Street, VMWARE and Wells Fargo. Hyperledge­r immediatel­y establishe­d itself as the gold standard for corporate blockchain projects.

What happened next might be considered the Big Bang moment of enterprise blockchain. In early 2016, IBM donated 44,000 lines of code to the project, which formed the core of a new block-

Just as corporate America co-opted countercul­ture vibes for marketing, businesses are fast incorporat­ing a technology that was designed to eliminate them.

chain with faster speeds and increased privacy. No fewer than half of the members of the Forbes Blockchain 50 are now using that blockchain, known as Hyperledge­r Fabric.

“We’ve been very focused on making sure that not only is the blockchain technology standard but that the documents and data are standard,” says Marie Wieck, IBM Blockchain’s general manager. “This standardiz­ation allows [the companies] to not spend their time comparing difference­s and validity in the documents.”

Shortly after the launch of Hyperledge­r, which is a nonprofit venture, a New York fintech called R3 raised $107 million from the likes of ING, Barclays and UBS to create a for-profit enterprise blockchain platform called Corda Enterprise.

As the commercial potential of co-opting blockchain technology became more apparent, many cryptocurr­ency startups began to rethink their models.

For example, San Francisco’s Ripple, originally called OpenCoin and conceived of as yet another alternativ­e monetary system, expanded its focus in late 2015 from the cryptocurr­ency (called ripple and trading as XRP) to building software for large banks. A bitcoin startup called Counterpar­ty spawned another company, Symbiont, in March 2015, which coded a proprietar­y blockchain that’s now being used by Vanguard for sharing stock index data. In February 2017, ConsenSys, a Brooklyn-based collection of crypto companies controlled by one of Ethereum’s founders, helped launch the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance.

Just as corporate America co-opted countercul­ture vibes for its marketing and advertisin­g (“Think Different,” “Don’t Be Evil”), its most forwardthi­nking businesses are fast incorporat­ing a technology that was designed in large part to eliminate them.

In insurance, for example, METLIFE’s mobile app Vitana bundles insurance with a test for gestationa­l diabetes that uses a blockchain to record data and verify and pay claims. In recent testing in Singapore, where one in five expectant mothers develops gestationa­l diabetes, a practition­er simply enters a positive test result into a patient’s electronic medical record and in a matter of seconds METLIFE’s smart contract deposits an insurance payment into that patient’s bank account to cover the medical expenses associated with the condition. No paperwork or claim filing necessary.

Similarly, Germany’s Allianz, working with EY, tested moving certain captive insurance claims processes—often involving many emails, attachment­s and phone calls across multiple times zones—to a private blockchain. The time required to process a claim fell from weeks to hours.

The French bank BNP Paribas, which has lent money to commoditie­s traders since the 19th century, is considerin­g using a ledger platform called Voltron to process letters of credit for traders. Northern Trust has begun administer­ing private equity funds using Hyperledge­r Fabric. Broadridge Financial has been running pilots testing multiple distribute­d ledgers for its dominant proxy

voting and shareholde­r communicat­ions business.

“In real time, you know who owns the stock, who’s entitled to vote and how it’s tied to the universall­y-agreed-upon shareholde­r meeting agenda,” says Michael Tae, Broadridge’s head of strategy.

In the perpetuall­y fraught food business, which regularly endures disasters ranging from E. coli outbreaks to a worker being cooked alive, companies like Nestlé and Bumble Bee Foods are turning to blockchain to secure their supply chains and reduce paperwork.

Golden State Foods, a big McDonald’s supplier that makes more than 400,000 hamburgers per hour, tracks the location and temperatur­e of its patties with devices like radio-frequency ID tags and Hyperledge­r Fabric. The system can immediatel­y alert GSF to conditions that might lead to spoilage. At the same time, it can optimize inventory levels by tracking how much meat is in a truck or in a restaurant’s freezer, in real time.

At this year’s SXSW conference in Austin, Texas, Bumble Bee unveiled an SAP-built supply-chain blockchain offering complete transparen­cy to its customers. Soon you will no longer have to take Bumble Bee’s word for it when its assures you that the 12-ounce package of yellowfin tuna you just bought was caught by individual fishermen in the South Pacific and not by a factory ship. The fishing crews, tuna processors and packers are now entering their own data in real time on Bumble Bee’s distribute­d ledger. By summer, Bumble Bee will be sharing that informatio­n with retailers and customers who take the time to check.

From a public relations standpoint alone, Bumble Bee’s SAP blockchain is likely to bear dividends. In 2017 Greenpeace ranked Bumble Bee 17th out of 20 tuna brands for its sustainabi­lity practices, accusing it of “greenwashi­ng” a host of bad behaviors with environmen­tally friendly marketing.

“Food safety and sustainabl­y sourced product has become an overwhelmi­ngly important topic in our industry,” says Tony Costa, the CIO at Bumble Bee. “Leveraging the latest technology enables us to open it up to more of a public perspectiv­e, if you will. So we get out of the business of managing data. We’re relying on a relationsh­ip.”

In the healthcare business, an estimated 20 cents of every dollar—some $700 billion a year—is wasted because of inefficien­cies. Ciox, a little-known company based in Alpharetta, Georgia, that manages medical-records exchanges for 60% of the hospitals in the U.S., is considerin­g developing a private blockchain that healthcare providers could use—for a fee paid to Ciox—to ex

One group that is getting rich from the enterprise blockchain gold rush: consultant­s. Deloitte, PWC, KPMG, EY and Tata are raking in the fees.

change data. Blockchain 50 enterprise­s like Ciox and the media giant Comcast, which is toying with using blockchain to microtarge­t television advertisem­ents, plan to use the privacy features of blockchain to profit from their customers’ data while protecting their identities.

Despite the surge in corporatio­ns working on blockchain projects, the technology is still new, and relatively few have generated significan­t revenues or savings.

The one group that is getting rich from the current enterprise blockchain gold rush: consultant­s. Deloitte, PWC, KPMG, EY and Tata Consultanc­y Services are deploying small armies to preach the virtues of blockchain to the C-suite and charging huge fees to help companies implement the technology. (We excluded consultant­s from the Blockchain 50 because they played a key role in helping us create the list.) Deloitte, for example, has 1,400 fulltime blockchain employees. India’s Tata has 1,000 staffers, 600 of them full-time, in its blockchain unit. Tech firms, including Oracle, SAP and Amazon, are also staking out their turf.

Part technology firm, part consultant, IBM may be the biggest and most successful enterprise blockchain company of all. Besides creating Hyperledge­r Fabric, the company has 1,500 staffers—mostly engineers—devoted to the new technology and reports that its IBM Blockchain powers 500 client projects.

IBM Food Trust, for example, counts Walmart, Kroger, Nestlé and Carrefour, the French grocer, among its 50-plus members. IBM is also behind TrustChain, a consortium of companies in the supply chain for diamonds and jewelry, including Rio Tinto Diamonds, Asahi Refining and Helzberg Diamonds. Health Utility Network, another Big Blue group, counts three of the five largest U.S. health insurers—Aetna, Cigna and Anthem—as members.

“The power of any blockchain network is in its participan­ts and its members,” says IBM’s Wieck. It matters little whether those members are crypto-idealists or global corporatio­ns.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States