Low turnout, apathy in India election a worry for Modi’s campaign
A LOWER turnout so far in India’s long general election has rattled prime minister Narendra Modi’s campaign managers, raising into question whether his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its allies can achieve the landslide victory predicted by opinion polls just one month ago.
The lack of momentum has been partly blamed on apathy among party workers believing victory is assured and seems to have prompted Modi to change tack in his campaign speeches to try to fire up the Hindu majority, the party’s support base, and get them out to voting stations, political analysts said.
The third phase of elections took place on Tuesday (7) but still, we are not even halfway through the world’s biggest polls which began on 19 April.
The last major opinion poll had predicted that the BJP and its allies could win threefourths of parliament’s 543 seats at stake on the back of Modi’s popularity, strong economic growth, handouts and the inauguration of a Hindu temple on a contested site in the Hindu majority country.
At the last election in 2019, the BJP won 303 seats and its allies won around 50 seats. Its slogan before this year’s election began was ‘Ab ki baar, 400 paar’ or ‘This time, above 400’.
More than half a dozen BJP leaders and political analysts that Reuters spoke to said a lack of momentum in the two initial phases of the seven-phase election have dampened hopes of a huge majority for the party, although they said it was still likely to retain power in the world’s most populous nation.
What could be affected is the BJP’s aim to get a two-thirds majority in the chamber, or 362 seats, which would let the party usher in far-reaching constitutional changes.
‘The fall in polling turnout is mainly due to apathy among party workers and voters,’ said Sanjay Sharma, one of the members of the BJP’s campaign committee in the northern state of Haryana.
Some candidates were being affected by an anti-incumbency wave, he said, adding the party was facing a ‘tough fight’ in the state where it won all ten parliamentary seats in 2019.
Modi himself has shifted in his campaign speeches from a focus on the administration’s successes in his 10-year tenure to targeting minority Muslims and the opposition Congress party.
‘After the first phase, we saw a definite change of strategy by the PM...delivering Islamophobic kind of speeches,’ said Arati Jerath, a Delhi-based political commentator.
‘Obviously, he has now decided to polarize the campaign.’
A total of 190 seats went to the polls on April 19 and 27 with approximate voter turnout at about 66 percent, the Election Commission has said. The number was only slightly lower than the last election in 2019, although there was a drop of 5-8 percentage points in voting in the BJP and allied-ruled states Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Rajasthan.
The BJP had been hoping for a high turnout, believing that would signal that its supporters had voted in force.
Polling ends on 1 June and votes will be counted on 4 June. The government bans the publication of exit polls until all voting is concluded.
‘Numbers not good enough’
Gopal Krishna Agarwal, BJP’s national spokesman, said the voting numbers were ‘below expectations’ but would not have much impact on the final results.
‘Many voters have become lethargic as they are convinced about the victory of the party,’ he said.
The BJP’s shift in tack may have backfired with some voters.
‘We have lost interest because the BJP is seeking votes by communalizing the campaign, and not on its performance,’ said Vikash Kumar, a voter in Rajnandgaon in the state of Chhattisgarh.
Kamal Abbas, a Muslim shopkeeper in the city of Lucknow, the capital of politically vital Uttar Pradesh state, reflected the sense of apathy. He said he would not waste time and money to travel to his hometown Prayagraj to vote as Modi’s party was set to win the election.
‘Minority votes do not stand anywhere in the majoritarian government... there is no point in wasting time,’ he said.
Anirudh Singh,one of the district campaign managers of the BJP in Uttar Pradesh, said the party would have reaped rich electoral dividends if the election was held during February-March, when fervor over the construction of the Ram Temple was at its peak.
‘The party has failed to encash public support for Modi after the inauguration of the temple,’ said Singh, noting that the religious feel-good mood had by and large been replaced by issues like jobs and inflation.
‘So far there’s neither a communal wave, nor a Ram wave, nor a Modi wave in the election,’ said Jerath, the political commentator, noting Modi would have to re-invigorate his party workers and supporters if he hoped for a sweep.
After being battered by Modi in the two last general elections, opposition parties are hopeful of a better performance.
Gilles Verniers, a political analyst at Amherst College in Massachusetts, said the BJP seemed to have revised its expectations and was feeling a bit rattled.
‘But it’s still a very long campaign. There’s still room for events and surprises that may alter the course of the election,’ he said.
‘The balance of probability continues to tilt in favor of the BJP, but not maybe as strongly as they would have hoped.’
BJP’s election videos spark outrage
Meanwhile, Animated videos shared by BJP targeting opposition Congress and the Muslim community have evoked complaints and outrage, as the political climate in India heats up midway through its six-week long election.
The videos, shared by the party on social media platforms Instagram and X over the last ten days, depict the Congress giving disproportionate benefits to India’s minority Muslim community, at the cost of certain disadvantaged tribal and Hindu caste groups.
The Congress, in a complaint to the poll watchdog Election Commission, said on Sunday (4) that the video has been shared ‘clearly with an intention to wantonly provocate rioting and promote enmity between different religions’.
A set of guidelines mutually adopted by political parties for how they should conduct themselves during the election period prohibit them from creating ‘mutual hatred’ between caste, religious or linguistic groups.
The video has elicited outrage. Nitasha Kaul, a politics professor at London’s Westminster University said on X that the video was a ‘straightforward 1930s Germany style cartoon’.