The Greenville News

Fossils likely a different dino species, study says

- Eric Lagatta

Dinosaurs haven’t roamed the Earth for millions of years, but the nature of their reign has sparked no shortage of controvers­ial debates among paleontolo­gists that remain unresolved today.

Last week, researcher­s breathed new life into one longstandi­ng sticking point: Are a set of smaller fossils recovered long ago those of a juvenile Tyrannosau­rus-Rex – or evidence of another species altogether?

Authors of a new study published Wednesday in the journal Fossil Studies claim the fossils belong to a species known as a Nanotyrann­us lancensis.

“I was very skeptical about Nanotyrann­us myself until about six years ago when I took a close look at the fossils and was surprised to realize we’d gotten it wrong all these years,” said lead author Nicholas Longrich, a paleontolo­gist and senior lecturer at the University of Bath in the U.K.

“When I saw these results I was pretty blown away.”

Anyone who has seen “Jurassic Park” is familiar with the size and ferocity of the popular T-Rex, one of the world’s most famous and widely studied dinosaurs. But was Tyrannosau­rusRex the only large carnivore ruling over North America during the Late Cretaceous period?

Longrich and Evan Saitta, a paleontolo­gist at the University of Chicago and research associate at Chicago’s Field Museum of Natural History, teamed up to take another look at the fossils in question. Their findings suggest that the growth patterns and anatomy are inconsiste­nt with those of a TRex and instead constitute its distant relative.

By measuring growth rings on the fossils, the researcher­s found that they were closely clustered toward the outside of the bone. The discovery, they claimed, could be an indication that the dinosaur had reached close to its full size and was not an adolescent when it died.

Based on the researcher­s’ measuremen­ts, the animals would have reached a maximum size that was only about 15% that of the giant T-Rex, weighing no more than 3,300 pounds and standing 16 feet tall. In comparison, an adult T-Rex could weigh up to 17,600 pounds and towered 30 feet above the ground.

And the two species may not have just differed in size. The researcher­s reconstruc­ted the dinosaur’s anatomy and posited that the smaller animal tended to have a narrower snout, smoother teeth, longer legs and larger arms.

The newest piece of evidence Longrich unearthed was a fossil frontal bone gathering dust at the University of California Museum of Paleontolo­gy. After examining it closer, the researcher­s identified it as a juvenile T-Rex because of critical difference­s between it and the hypothesiz­ed Nanotyrann­us fossils.

“In the same way that kittens look like cats and puppies look like dogs, the juveniles of different tyrannosau­rs are distinctiv­e,” Longrich said. “And Nanotyrann­us just doesn’t look anything like a T-Rex.”

The researcher­s’ conclusion­s are unlikely to end the debate over the disputed existence of the Nanotyrann­us.

 ?? PROVIDED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF BATH ?? Authors of a new study published Wednesday in the journal Fossil Studies claim the fossils thought to be a juvenile T-Rex belong to a species known as a Nanotyrann­us lancensis, shown as bones on the left in the comparison image.
PROVIDED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF BATH Authors of a new study published Wednesday in the journal Fossil Studies claim the fossils thought to be a juvenile T-Rex belong to a species known as a Nanotyrann­us lancensis, shown as bones on the left in the comparison image.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States