The Greenville News

Flint to Biden: Approve funds to settle water suit

- Paul Egan

DETROIT – As they observe Thursday’s 10th anniversar­y of the Flint’s drinking water disaster, city residents are calling on President Joe Biden to acknowledg­e a federal role in the catastroph­e and approve funds to settle a 7-year-old lawsuit against the U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency.

The state of Michigan agreed in 2020 to pay $600 million for its role in what came to be known as the Flint water crisis, and the city of Flint settled for $20 million in the same massive lawsuit.

But the EPA, which is charged with ensuring compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act, has never acknowledg­ed liability for its role, despite a paper trail that shows its officials knew about dangerousl­y inadequate treatment of water from the Flint River months before residents were notified.

In February, the EPA asked U.S. District Judge Linda Parker in Detroit to dismiss a lawsuit brought against it by thousands of Flint residents, based on a type of government­al immunity, despite the fact Parker rejected similar arguments from the federal agency in 2019.

“The disaster was preventabl­e had the EPA simply done its job,” Flint residents Jan Burgess, Rhonda Kelso and Melissa Mays, who are plaintiffs in the lawsuit brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, said in a Tuesday letter to Biden, who was vice president when the water crisis began.

The White House had no immediate response to the letter, a spokeswoma­n said.

The water crisis began on April 25, 2014, when the city switched the source of its water supply from Lake Huron to the Flint River as a temporary cost-cutting measure, at the direction of a state-appointed emergency manager.

A state agency, then called the Michigan Department of Environmen­tal Quality, has acknowledg­ed a catastroph­ic error in not requiring the city to treat the raw water with corrosion control chemicals. As a result, lead leached from pipes and fixtures, causing a spike in blood lead levels.

The EPA was almost immediatel­y inundated with complaints about discolored and bad-smelling drinking water, and “by April 2015 the EPA was aware that the state lied to them in February 2015” when it said it was using corrosion control as part of its water treatment, according to pleadings in the case. Yet, the EPA took no enforcemen­t action until January 2016.

A 2018 report by the EPA Office of Inspector General said the agency “did not manage its drinking water oversight program in a way that facilitate­d effective oversight and timely interventi­on in Flint.”

Despite the settlement with the state and some other defendants, Flint residents have yet to see a dime from the $626.25 million settlement fund announced in 2020 and are not expected to be paid for several more months, due to delays in the claims administra­tion process.

The Free Press reported in March that while Flint residents continue to wait, lawyers in the case have received partial payments totaling $40.8 million, plus $7.1 million in expenses, and the court has authorized an additional $17 million in payments for claims administra­tion expenses.

 ?? ??
 ?? RYAN GARZA/DETROIT FREE PRESS FILE ?? The Environmen­tal Protection Agency has never acknowledg­ed liability for its role in the Flint water crisis.
RYAN GARZA/DETROIT FREE PRESS FILE The Environmen­tal Protection Agency has never acknowledg­ed liability for its role in the Flint water crisis.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States