Greenwich Time (Sunday)

Impact of millions spent on brownfield­s uncertain in Conn.

- By Michael Puffer REPUBLICAN-AMERICAN

WATERBURY — There’s no telling how many empty industrial buildings are rotting away on polluted properties in Connecticu­t.

The brownfield inventory maintained by the state Department of Energy and Environmen­tal Protection lists 516 sites. But state officials admit that’s not comprehens­ive. Sites only land on the list after state involvemen­t in cleanup efforts. Given the state’s long industrial history, DEEP estimates there are “probably tens of thousands” of polluted sites.

Connecticu­t’s inventory lists properties enrolled in a state brownfield program.

“We know there are thousands across the state,” said Maria Chrysochoo­u, director of the Connecticu­t Brownfield­s Initiative at the University of Connecticu­t. “Hartford, Bridgeport and New Haven all have hundreds. There really is no good way to know exactly if we are talking 1,000, 2,000 or 10,000.”

Advised by a team of industry and municipal experts, the university program provides students training in grant writing, site investigat­ion, legal issues and cleanups. It’s an attempt to create a crop of experts able to tackle the problem. UConn students are working with Torrington to inventory that city’s polluted sites, including the Smurfit-Stone Container factory site.

Historical­ly, municipali­ties have been squeamish about taking on abandoned sites that might mean millions of dollars in cleanup costs, Chrysochoo­u said. Some site owners also don’t want to know what’s in the ground. It’s easier to simply keep paying taxes and let them sit idle, she said.

“It’s really up to towns to have discussion­s with owners like that and find ways to move them forward,” Chrysochoo­u said. “If an owner is there, they are afraid of getting into the process of investigat­ion because then they will be on the hook for the cost of cleaning up.”

Connecticu­t officials can’t say how many jobs are created or local tax revenue generated by the hundreds of millions of dollars spent on brownfield­s.

They have estimates of job creation based on a formula extrapolat­ed from dollars spent. But the state doesn’t do any sort of post cleanup research on jobs or new taxes created. State officials can’t say how many acres have been cleaned up. The state’s accounting mingles acres where the extent of pollution was studied with sites where cleanup has actually gone ahead.

Connecticu­t Department of Economic and Community Developmen­t Deputy Director David Kooris said he noticed the lack of follow-up data when he joined the agency nine months ago. He hopes to do something about it, perhaps working with the UConn program.

“We need to put staff on it, work with our partners at UConn and do more of a post-state participat­ion review,” Kooris said. “We don’t typically trail it after our involvemen­t. We are ending up with a somewhat incomplete picture that is underrepre­senting the magnitude of the impact.”

So far, the state’s only real metric for success has been how much money from “other sources” is spent on brownfield projects.

The state has spent approximat­ely $206 million over the past decade, leveraging another $3.2 billion in other cleanup and developmen­t funds, according to DECD spokesman James Watson. That means about $15.50 is invested for every $1 spent through the brownfield programs, Watson said.

University of Connecticu­t economist Fred Carstensen said he’s disappoint­ed, if not surprised, by the state’s metrics for success.

“That’s classic Connecticu­t,” Carstensen said. “How can you function like that? You need a systematic way of evaluating sites.”

Even the state’s spending ratio is suspect. It’s based on reporting from cities and towns and other applicants. Not all have reported in the same way. Municipal and private spending on brownfield­s in Waterbury, for instance, is dramatical­ly underrepor­ted.

There are no shortages of examples of success. In Waterbury, the biggest has been the transforma­tion of 90 acres of rundown manufactur­ing buildings into Brass Mill Center mall, which opened in 1997, along with the neighborin­g Brass Mill Commons retail complex.

State and federal sources contribute­d $36 million for demolition and cleanup at the former Scovill Manufactur­ing site. The mall, along with its associated retail plaza, paid $4.8 million to Waterbury in 2016, according to the most recent tax records available. It’s the city’s thirdlarge­st taxpayer, behind Yankee Gas and Connecticu­t Light & Power.

About one mile east of the mall, the shuttered Mattatuck Manufactur­ing factory was torn down and replaced with a Waterbury senior center, a hospital annex and a funeral home. The cleanup lasted a decade and cost roughly $6 million.

DECD is unable to say how much state money went into that cleanup. The Republican-American reported that at least $2.4 million in state grants went to the project. The Cities Project, a collaborat­ion between CT Mirror, Connecticu­t Public Radio, Hearst Connecticu­t Media, The Hartford Courant, Republican­American of Waterbury, Hartford Business Journal and Purple States, will publish periodic articles exploring challenges and solutions related to revitalizi­ng Connecticu­t’s cities.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States