Greenwich Time (Sunday)

Abstracts that look to the sky

ABSTRACT PAINTER CHARLES GULBRANDSE­N ECHOES HIS GRANDFATHE­R’S GRAND CENTRAL CONSTELLAT­IONS

- By Joel Lang Joel Lang is a freelance writer.

The artist Charles Gulbrandse­n is happy to agree when viewers tell him they see a celestial quality in the abstract paintings that mark the latest stage in his varied career. “It’s fully my intention to bring a little bit of the divine into the ordinary,” he says, before cautioning he does not consider himself especially devout.

Rather, his celestial inspiratio­ns come from close encounters of another kind. It happens that Gulbrandse­n’s paternal grandfathe­r worked on the 1913 crew that painted the ceiling constellat­ions of Grand Central Terminal. Years later he was back, serving as head painter when the ceiling was restored in 1945.

That might be no more than a footnote in Gulbrandse­n’s own career, except that just like his grandfathe­r, also named Charles, he also became a skilled muralist and restoratio­nist. He even followed his grandfathe­r to Grand Central, working on the crew restoring the ceiling in 1996.

While he was up there on the scaffoldin­g, he was interviewe­d by a writer from the New Yorker magazine and might have pointed out what none of the millions who have looked up at the ceiling could see: Gulbrandse­n’s parents’ names written under Pegasus’ wings. He says his grandfathe­r had put them there in 1945 when the couple climbed the scaffoldin­g to reveal their wedding plans.

Gulbrandse­n was 12 when his grandfathe­r died in 1974, but he did visit his studio and was personally introduced to the Grand Central ceiling. “One of the great memories of my life is being on my dad’s shoulders (inside the terminal’s great hall), with my grandfathe­r there, pointing up to all the constellat­ions,” he says.

He knew their bare lightbulb stars were intended to show off the miracle of electric power. “It represente­d something possible if you dreamed it. It set the bar pretty high, literally,” he says of his own ambitions.

Gulbrandse­n’s grandfathe­r did murals in landmark New York buildings such as the Bronx County Courthouse. Later, he did set designs for early TV variety shows, like Ed Sullivan’s. Gulbrandse­n himself attended the Cooper Union art school on full scholarshi­p. He studied painting, but immediatel­y upon graduation in 1985 was hired by a restoratio­nist working on Maxfield Parrish murals in Philadelph­ia.

A job restoring seven WPA-era murals by James Dougherty, the painter and award winning children’s book illustrato­r who made his home in Weston, brought him to Connecticu­t. Dougherty had done them in 1934 for the octagonal auditorium in Stamford High School. He says the city was about to discard them when a student rescued them from a dumpster.

Meanwhile, Gulbrandse­n, who now lives in Woodbury and is a resident artist at Ridgefield’s new RPAC art center, was gaining commission­s both as a muralist and copyist of classic paintings..

Prominentl­y featured on his website is a six-foot-tall reproducti­on of “The Water Girl,” a painting by the 19th-century French artist Willem-Adolph Bougereau.

For another client, he did a pair of wall-size murals that were enlargemen­ts of animal paintings by the English artist George Stubbs.

For other clients, Gulbrandse­n created murals of his own compositio­n, some of them astounding in scale. For a New Canaan residence, he did a Serengeti Plain mural that wrapped around two walls. For a client relocating from Hong Kong, Gulbrandse­n spent a year painting oriental harbor scenes throughout the apartment the client had bought in New York. Moving in, the client presented his girlfriend with the key to the apartment, in a box like an engagement ring.

All his work modes, restoratio­ns, reproducti­ons, original murals, drew on Gulbrandse­n’s technical skills. The “in painting” required for a restoratio­n helped him understand the methods of painters like Stubbs. “It’s discovery,” he says. “You get to the nitty gritty. You walk in their shoes. It takes a little while to get comfortabl­e.”

For the new abstract paintings that are most his own, Gulbrandse­n says he goes to a “different place. It’s the distinctio­n between poetry and prose.” They also take him back to his childhood.

He says he thinks of his representa­tional work as being done in layers, like the acetate overlay illustrati­ons he saw in World Book encyclodep­ias. He thinks the cosmic quality of his abstract work descends from his father. Another Charles, he did not become a painter. He was a mathematic­ian who worked at IBM. But his passion and hobby was astronomy.

“He was constantly bringing home books about quantum particle theory and string theory. As I look back, it’s probably not a coincidenc­e that a lot of my abstract work emanates from having luminous nebula and a luminous metric of interconne­ctivity. I don’t use Hubble space telescope images,” he says. “I’m subconscio­usly rememberin­g them (the images from his father’s books).”

There are no bright star Pegasuses and Orions in Gulbrandse­n’s abstractio­ns. Instead, they are, as he says, nebulae of color or what might be close-ups of planets.

In one of his favorite small paintings, “Ascension,” twin chunks of rock appear to have broken off from their host planet and begun a journey into the unknown. The twins are surrounded by serpentine arches, bowing farewell.

“Ascension” is done in thick oil on a wood panel only 16 by 20 inches in size. Yet it plays huge, like the equally small and thickly painted “Brink.” If it’s a planet, it has elephant ear mountains.

In both, Gulbrandse­n says, “I was interested in exposing the contrast between the ethereal atmosphere and a heavily textured, impastoed paint surface.”

At the other end of the scale is “Rising,” a three-panel 80-by-80 inch painting in which cottony nebulae float, or hang, in a curtain of cosmic vines. Another hallmark of his paintings, the vines are vertical and noduled. Once again, he has no problem when people tell him they look like nerve ganglions. Nerves after all are the body’s interior connectivi­ty.

Another large painting and one of the few with a human image is “Out of the Blue,” a diptych in which the faces of two women appear like suns. The faces are painted masks that project from the surface. They are yin and yang, one high, one low. Gulbrandse­n says the painting was partly inspired by the three sets of sisters in his family, including his own two daughters.

Several of his paintings are on display in a RPAC group show that runs to Sept. 20. In mid-summer, he had a solo show at the Rene Soto Gallery in Norwalk, which represents him. He says had intended to put a painting, “SEED,” on the invitation, but it sold before the exhibit opened.

Considered by many one of his strongest paintings, “SEED” is a swirl of nebulae, spawning a pair of purplish pods fed by heart-like arteries.

 ??  ??
 ?? Getty Images ?? Since its 1913 opening, the main concourse at Grand Central Terminal has included a stylized star map on its lofty ceiling. The grandson of one of constellat­ion mural’s artists has created a series of abstracts that continue to celestial theme.
Getty Images Since its 1913 opening, the main concourse at Grand Central Terminal has included a stylized star map on its lofty ceiling. The grandson of one of constellat­ion mural’s artists has created a series of abstracts that continue to celestial theme.
 ?? Charles Gulbrandse­n / Contributi­on photo ?? Charles Gulbrandse­n’s most recent abstracts, such as one called “Rising,” look upward.
Charles Gulbrandse­n / Contributi­on photo Charles Gulbrandse­n’s most recent abstracts, such as one called “Rising,” look upward.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States