Greenwich Time (Sunday)

Can transit-based developmen­t lift state?

- Alma Rutgers Alma Rutgers served in Greenwich town government for 30 years.

“When will the state respond to this crisis?”

Sean Ghio, policy director at Partnershi­p for Strong Communitie­s, posed this question at the March 15 public hearing of the Connecticu­t Legislatur­e’s Planning and Developmen­t Committee. Ghio, like so many speakers, was testifying in favor of HB6890, Desegregat­e Connecticu­t’s proposed Work Live Ride legislatio­n that encourages the developmen­t of transitori­ented communitie­s.

Referring to the state’s housing crisis, Ghio, among the last speakers at the nearly 14-hour public hearing, pointed out that more than 52 percent of Connecticu­t renters are cost burdened, spending more than 30 percent of their income on housing. According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, 68 percent of extremely low-income households in Connecticu­t are severely cost burdened, spending more than 50 percent of their income on housing.

These families experience anxiety-producing housing instabilit­y, with the possibilit­y of eviction and homelessne­ss ever-present. They live with serious food insecurity and must make spending choices that often preclude health care.

The National Low Income Housing Coalition finds there’s a shortage of 89,013 rental units affordable to extremely low-income renters in Connecticu­t. Other estimates are that between 86,000 and 135,000 new housing units are needed to address the need.

Karen DuBois-Walton, president of Elm City Communitie­s (Housing Authority of the City of New Haven), who spoke in support of the proposed legislatio­n, said there’s a desperate shortage of housing and a crisis in housing affordabil­ity, with more than 30,000 applicants on the Elm City Communitie­s waiting list. Many are severely cost burdened, live in dilapidate­d, unsafe housing, are in shelter systems, or live doubled up with others.

While acknowledg­ing the proposed Work Live Ride legislatio­n does not directly address housing affordabil­ity, although containing affordabil­ity provisions, DuboisWalt­on said it “helps move the needle” by incentiviz­ing opportunit­ies to create more housing. Her message was that there’s no one solution. Zoning reform can incentiviz­e building, she said. Simply put, the lack of affordabil­ity can be seen in the context of supply and demand. Work Live Ride seeks to increase housing supply according to sound planning principles in an environmen­tally sustainabl­e way.

“We have 100,000 jobs going begging in our state,” Gov. Ned Lamont said in his 2023 State of the State address, citing an aging population, insufficie­nt population growth, and the critical lack of affordable housing. “Every business thinking about moving or expanding repeats, over and over: ‘Even if you had the workforce, there is no place for them to live.’ ”

“Work Live Ride is the product of us listening to communitie­s, leaders, industry, and advocates and coming up with a plan that will help communitie­s that want to grow…” Pete Harrison, director of Desegregat­e Connecticu­t, said in an email. “We have conducted over a dozen TOC Walk Audits in transit communitie­s that have done TOD developmen­t or are trying to … we also know there’s a wider coalition of support for this and passing it will meaningful­ly impact a lot of places as well as beginning to change our collective 20th century car-centric mindset.”

In his testimony at the public hearing, Harrison referred to the “staggering economic and racial segregatio­n in Connecticu­t” attributab­le to exclusiona­ry zoning. Work Live Ride seeks to create a better, more dynamic, sustainabl­e Connecticu­t, he said.

The proposed legislatio­n, which encourages concentrat­ed developmen­t around train stations, bus lines, and existing infrastruc­ture, offers municipali­ties incentives to create a transit-oriented district, working in collaborat­ion with the state. Nothing requires a municipali­ty to opt in. Those that opt out simply forgo discretion­ary infrastruc­ture-related state monies that are prioritize­d for those that opt in.

During the hearing, the need to clarify certain language in the bill became apparent, most notably the nature of these discretion­ary funds and the collaborat­ive planning relationsh­ip between participat­ing municipali­ties and the state. Minor tweaking.

Like so many of the young people who spoke in favor of the legislatio­n (college students, recent college graduates, young profession­als) Harrison, who grew up in Connecticu­t, said he loves our state, but doesn’t know if he will ever be able to afford to buy a home here.

Elena Brennan, a student at Wesleyan, said the bill offered hope that she might someday be able to afford a small unit near transit. “That is just kind of the dream,” she said.

Making such dreams a reality is to invest in Connecticu­t’s sustainabl­e future.

 ?? COMMENTARY ??
COMMENTARY

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States