Greenwich Time (Sunday)

A long road to legalizati­on of aid-in-dying law

- By Tim Appleton Tim Appleton is Connecticu­t campaign director of the Compassion & Choices Action Network.

For more than a decade, I’ve advocated for Connecticu­t lawmakers to pass a medical aid-indying law to allow a mentally capable, terminally ill adult the option to decide to take prescripti­on medication to peacefully end unbearable suffering at the end of their life. Despite the fact that more than three-quarters of Connecticu­t voters support this policy (75 percent vs. 21 percent), which is already approved in 10 states and Washington, D.C., our state lawmakers have not approved medical aid-indying legislatio­n in more than a dozen attempts.

After another failure to pass a medical aid-indying bill last spring, I wanted to better understand the reasons and rethink what we could do to convince lawmakers to say yes. Our supporters, who give freely of their time to advocate for passage, were devastated when the legislatio­n did not even get a vote in the Judiciary Committee after the Public Health Committee approved it for the third straight year.

For several of our supporters who are terminally ill and want to have the option of medical aid in dying when their time comes, the failure to pass legislatio­n could force difficult decisions. Do they leave their homes and relocate to a nearby state where medical aid in dying is allowed, such as Maine, New Jersey or Vermont to experience a peaceful death without needless suffering?

In my effort to find a new approach, I decided to walk across Connecticu­t from my home in South Windsor and travel to all four corners of the state. My plan: to visit districts of key lawmakers who support and oppose the legislatio­n and talk with constituen­ts along the way.

Over 30 days and 300 miles, I talked to hundreds of people and re-learned something I had almost begun to take for granted after living here for 25 years. Connecticu­t is a remarkably beautiful state, with a fascinatin­g history, spectacula­r countrysid­e, and warm and welcoming people. It’s a place where people want to live and raise families, and to live their final days.

I walked with dozens of supporters, most with stories that brought them to advocate for medical aid in dying. They included wives, husbands and friends who sat at the bedsides of dying loved ones, who in their final days, asked for help in gently ending needless suffering that Connecticu­t law does not allow.

Our conversati­ons were often not about medical aid in dying or those difficult deaths, but about our lives, our children; funny, happy stories about the people we know or the towns we were visiting. I came to have a much richer understand­ing of supporters who have come to the state Capitol year after year to share wrenching stories of their loved ones’ deaths. Connecticu­t is their home, where they work and live and play, where family, friends, and colleagues are their support.

The thought of uprooting someone who is terminally ill, in their final days, and taking them away from everything and everyone they know and love, to ease their passing is especially cruel. And yet without the passage of medical aid-in-dying legislatio­n in Connecticu­t, it is the only option available to end intolerabl­e suffering when no other option provides relief.

Medical aid in dying has a long and proven history of successful implementa­tion across the country. While critics warn of malfeasanc­e and misuse, there is no evidence of that, including more than 25 years of use in Oregon alone.

Critics worry that its availabili­ty would prompt overuse. But the opposite has proven true.

Since implementa­tion more than 25 years ago in Oregon in 1997, and following implementa­tion in 10 other jurisdicti­ons, fewer than 6,400 people across the country have utilized this end-of-life care option.

There is a cost to not passing medical aid-indying legislatio­n. Without legislatio­n, terminally ill people who want to utilize this end-of-life option are forced to choose between a needlessly painful and difficult death, and leaving their home and everything they know and love to find a peaceful end, as my friend Lynda Bluestein was forced to do this month.

I urge lawmakers to raise a bill, hold a public hearing in the Judiciary Committee, pay attention to the facts. Disregard the misinforma­tion from opponents for whom there will never be enough “safeguards” because they oppose this option under any circumstan­ces. Please consider the needs and the will of an overwhelmi­ng majority of Connecticu­t residents and pass medical aid-in-dying legislatio­n in 2024.

Every one of us is one diagnosis away from having to ponder our end-oflife care options. Every one of us deserves access to all of the options today. Tomorrow or next year may be too late.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States