Guymon Daily Herald

Rashada case in Florida highlights issues in NIL

-

Broken promises and unrealisti­c expectatio­ns have been part of college football recruiting for as long as coaches have been pitching their programs in living rooms across America.

Opportunit­ies for playing time and a path to the NFL are being peddled, as always, but now potentiall­y lucrative endorsemen­t deals handled by boosterrun collective­s are also in the mix. There is even more potential for prospects to feel shortchang­ed after signing a national letter of intent.

When college football’s traditiona­l winter signing period opens Wednesday, among the unsigned blue-chippers will be Jaden Rashada. The four-star quarterbac­k from California signed with Florida in December, but asked for and was granted his release after an endorsemen­t agreement with a collective that was potentiall­y worth more than $13 million fell through.

The ill-fated deal between Rashada and the Gator Collective — one that helped persuade him to back off a previous verbal commitment to Miami and a name, image and likeness offer from a collective that works with Hurricanes athletes —- should be a cautionary tale for recruiting in the NIL era.

“NIL and the presence of collective­s and promises to prospects create a facet of the recruiting experience that is 100% outside of the school’s control, and what’s being magnified with the Rashada situation is the promises of independen­t third parties are impacting where kids decide to go to school,” said Blake Lawrence, the CEO of Opendorse, a company that works with schools and collective­s on NIL compliance and other services.

The NCAA lifted a ban on athletes cashing in on their fame in 2021. While the associatio­n still has rules in place that make it impermissi­ble to use NIL as a recruiting inducement, patchwork state laws and the fear of legal challenges have prevented the NCAA from putting detailed, uniform regulation­s in place.

The rise of collective­s, which operate outside a school and its athletic department but ideally in its best interest, prompted the NCAA to clarify that collective­s —- like individual boosters — can’t be involved in the recruiting process.

But the lines have been blurred as coaches try to present potential NIL opportunit­ies to recruits without making guarantees.

“The coaches that are well coached on NIL say things like this, ‘I can’t promise you anything. But what I can share is that a player that is in your position on our campus is currently receiving X-Y-Z,’” Lawrence said.

Coaches and athletic department employees can publicly support collective­s that support their athletes, though they can’t directly raise funds. That easily allows recruits to identify the collective­s most closely associated with the schools pursuing them.

Still, many who run collective­s proceed cautiously when it comes to contact with recruits.

“They can reach out to us. Frankly, I avoid those conversati­ons because it’s such a fine line between sharing informatio­n and enticement,” said Gary Marcinick, president and CEO of Cohesion Foundation, an NIL collective that works with Ohio State athletes.

Mike Caspino, an NIL attorney who has worked with numerous college athletes on deals with collective­s — including Rashada’s with Miami — sees it differentl­y.

He said the difference in recruiting pitches that fall inside and outside the rules comes down to semantics. Ideally, schools would be directly involved with NIL deals instead of having an outside entity with little accountabi­lity representi­ng its interests.

Caspino said the Rashada/Florida situation is indicative of systemic problems with NIL and recruiting.

“Such as a lack of adequate representa­tion on both sides, such as a lack of documentat­ion, such as we need to treat these as the business deals that they are,” Caspino said. “And in any business deal, we’re going to have a contract that sets forth everybody’s obligation­s, and the benefits everybody receives from the contract. And we don’t do that.”

Lawrence also said the reality behind the rhetoric is that most collective­s are not funded well enough to meet the demand for NIL deals.

Todd Berry, the executive director of the American Football Coaches Associatio­n, said coaches worry about collective­s dictating what players they can recruit.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States