Hamilton Journal News

Telemedici­ne fees in flux

Virtual visits grew in popularity during pandemic.

- By Sarah Gantz

PHILADELPH­IA — Telemedici­ne has become immensely popular during the COVID-19 pandemic as a safe and convenient way to see a medical provider without leaving home.

Doctors and analysts say telemedici­ne is here to stay, but the price patients pay for the convenienc­e of seeing a health-care provider from their living room could change.

Out of necessity during the pandemic, insurers agreed to pay for virtual visits like they would an in-person appointmen­t, doctors who had been reluctant to try new technology embraced it as a way to limit patient exposure, and lawmakers loosened federal regulation­s that for years had restricted telemedici­ne’s use.

But more than 18 months into a public health emergency, some private insurance companies have begun to roll back their pandemic-era coverage policies or fallen into a pattern of extending coverage for only a few months at a time.

Uncertain how they will be compensate­d for virtual visits in the future, some health systems have resorted to charging for telemedici­ne services — regardless of insurance coverage.

“The continuous kicking the can down the road and paying for another few months doesn’t give health systems any confidence,” said Judd Hollander, senior vice president for health-care delivery innovation at Jefferson Health, which operates in Pennsylvan­ia and New Jersey.

Jefferson’s virtual medicine platform, JeffConnec­t, launched prior to the pandemic, but grew exponentia­lly in spring 2020 when the system saw about 3,000 patients virtually every day.

The platform provides on-demand visits with a medical provider, and currently handles about 1,000 patients a day. That kind of immediate service has been popular with patients, but has created a challenge for administra­tors: Providing on-demand insurance coverage verificati­on would require new technology that connects to leading insurers’ member databases.

“The one biggest problem is uncertaint­y about what reimbursem­ent will be in the future,” Hollander said. “If I knew (insurers) were never going to pay, we’d go back to in-person, but everyone believes they have to pay because patients love telemedici­ne.”

But the pandemic has also drawn attention to how the digital divide and lack of access to the Internet can become a new barrier, deepening health inequities.

Jefferson recently launched the Center for Connected Care to study and address those challenges.

“The pandemic accelerate­d the trend to virtual care at home, and it showed us how many people are at risk of being left behind as the digital gap grows,” Kristin Rising, an emergency medicine physician and head of the new center, said in a statement.

At Rothman Orthopedic Institute, telemedici­ne shored up business during the pandemic, making up for a loss of in-person appointmen­ts. Now that many patients have returned in-person, telehealth remains popular and has helped Rothman grow its patient base.

Rothman President Alexander Vaccaro said he isn’t concerned about how much insurers pay him for telehealth visits in the future, so long as it remains an option for patients.

“It’s giving me access to people — access is what we care about,” he said.

Surgeons make money in the operating room, not in office visits, he said. Making office visits accessible to more people has led to a growth in surgery patients — half of whom Vaccaro now meets in person for the first time just before heading in for surgery.

Lawmakers loosened key regulation­s to make telehealth more accessible during the pandemic. Patients previously had to travel to a medical facility for their virtual appointmen­t, which was done through a secured, HIPAA-compliant video platform. Now, they can call in using familiar applicatio­ns, like Zoom, Skype and Facetime.

A Medicare rule that allowed coverage for audio-only telemedici­ne visits was especially helpful for seniors who lacked video access or know-how, she said.

Proposed Medicare rule changes for 2022 continue the popular audio-only telehealth coverage, as well as telemedici­ne coverage for behavioral health without site restrictio­ns, said Lori Uscher-Pines, a senior policy researcher at RAND Corp. who has been tracking telemedici­ne policies. Previously, Medicare only covered virtual visits for mental health in rural areas, where services were often lacking, but eliminated that restrictio­n during the pandemic.

New Medicare policies could be a bellwether for private insurance.

“Medicare often sets the tone,” she said.

 ?? DREAMSTIME/TNS ?? Doctors and analysts say telemedici­ne is here to stay, but the price could change.
DREAMSTIME/TNS Doctors and analysts say telemedici­ne is here to stay, but the price could change.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States