Hamilton Journal News

Schumer vows abortion law vote, not filibuster changes

- By Lisa Mascaro

WASHINGTON — Furious Senate Democrats vowed Tuesday to vote on legislatio­n to protect abortion access for millions of Americans after a leaked draft Supreme Court opinion, but without broader support from Republican­s the Congress is essentiall­y powerless to prevent the unraveling of the landmark Roe v. Wade ruling.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said the conservati­ve justices “lied” to the Senate during confirmati­on hearings when they assured senators the case that since 1973 has allowed abortion access was settled law. And two Republican­s who publicly support abortion access, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine, pushed their bill to turn the Roe v. Wade ruling into law.

“The Supreme Court is poised to inflict the greatest restrictio­n of rights in the past 50 years — not just on women, but on all Americans,” Schumer said.

Murkowski told reporters on Capitol Hill that if the direction of the draft becomes the final opinion, “I will just tell you that it rocks my confidence in the court right now.”

The Congress, however, can do little to stop the court from undoing Roe v. Wade unless more Republican­s join Democrats in voting to protect abortion access, which is almost certainly unlikely. Schumer said the Senate would vote next week, but facing a certain filibuster by Republican­s, the Democrats signaled they prefer to fight over the issue on the campaign trail this fall, rather than in Congress. The House is away this week.

Republican­s have spent decades laser-focused on the high court, installing conservati­ve justices intent on revisiting abortion and other social issues, including three ushered to confirmati­on by Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell during the Trump era to build the court’s solid 6-3 majority.

Typically reveling in his role as the architect of the conservati­ve Supreme Court majority, McConnell demurred Tuesday when asked if he took credit for engineerin­g a decision that would end the constituti­onal right to an abortion for millions of women.

Instead, McConnell, R-Kentucky, said the focus should be on getting to the bottom of the unusual leak of the draft document from the typically quiet court.

“I think the story today is the effort by someone on the inside,” McConnell said of the leak.

Schumer shot back that Republican­s are afraid to own what they have brought because “they are on the wrong side of history.”

Passing an abortion access bill through the Senate remains a political longshot, especially under the rapid timeline that would be needed before the Supreme Court issues its final decisions in June.

Schumer stopped short of promising to change Senate filibuster rules to allow Democrats to overcome Republican obstructio­n and pass legislatio­n that would salvage the landmark abortion law on their own, as some party advocates are demanding.

The Democratic leader does not have the votes within the Democrats’ razorthin 50-vote majority to muscle through a rules change in the Senate that would allow Democrats to push past what is typically a 60-vote threshold on big bills.

The political fallout in Congress is certain to be far-reaching and complicate­d, a gripping new phase in the partisan fights over abortion access, religious liberties and the fundamenta­l aspects of women’s reproducti­ve health.

The Republican senators in particular, who helped turn the court into a solid 6-3 conservati­ve majority, face deep scrutiny over their public beliefs at the time and the reality now confrontin­g the country.

Collins in a morning statement pointed blame back to the justices themselves, personally singling out two of the three Trump-era judges, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, she had supported for confirmati­on.

The Maine Republican said if the leaked draft opinion on abortion becomes the ruling of the court, “it would be completely inconsiste­nt with what Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh said in their hearings and in our meetings in my office.”

Collins helped confirm both of those nominees, though she did not vote for Justice Amy Coney Barrett because the nomination came so close to the 2020 election, when the presidency was being decided and she also faced a stiff reelection race.

Murkowski, who is up for reelection this year, did not vote for Kavanaugh after his explosive confirmati­on hearings over allegation­s he sexually assaulted a woman acquaintan­ce during high school. She did give her support to Gorsuch and Barrett.

One pivotal Democrat, Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who talks frequently with McConnell, declined to weigh into the debate — or whether he would be willing to rethink his opposition to changing filibuster rules. He has been a holdout denying Democrats of the 51 votes needed to change the rules.

“Let’s wait to see everything,” Manchin said.

 ?? TOM BRENNER / NEW YORK TIMES ?? Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) makes a statement on the Supreme Court outside the Senate steps Tuesday in Washington. The Supreme Court’s leaked draft opinion, which could change before it is finalized, indicated the court would let individual states determine abortion’s legality.
TOM BRENNER / NEW YORK TIMES Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) makes a statement on the Supreme Court outside the Senate steps Tuesday in Washington. The Supreme Court’s leaked draft opinion, which could change before it is finalized, indicated the court would let individual states determine abortion’s legality.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States