Hamilton Journal News

Depp libel suit moves ahead against Heard after resting case

- By Matthew Barakat

FALLS CHURCH, VA. — A judge on Tuesday let Johnny Depp move forward with his libel suit against his ex-wife, Amber Heard, after the “Pirates of the Caribbean” star rested his case.

Heard’s lawyers had asked the judge to dismiss the case, arguing that Depp had failed to make his case as a matter of law and that no reasonable jury could find in his favor.

But the judge, Penney Azcarate, said the standard for dismissing a case at this point in the trial is exceedingl­y high, and that the case should be allowed to move forward if Depp has provided even a “scintilla” of evidence backing up his claims.

The trial moved forward Tuesday afternoon with Heard’s team beginning to present its witnesses after more than three weeks of testimony from Depp’s witnesses, including four days on the stand from Depp himself.

Depp and his lead lawyer, Benjamin Chew, patted each other on the back after the judge ruled the case can proceed.

Chew argued that the jury has a wealth of evidence to conclude that Heard falsely accused Depp of abuse. In fact, he said, the evidence shows that “Ms. Heard physically abused him. She’s the abuser.”

Heard’s lawyer, J. Benjamin Rottenborn, said the evidence is clear over the last three weeks of testimony that Heard’s allegation­s of abuse are truthful.

“We haven’t gotten to put on our case yet,” he said. “This is all evidence that has come in while plaintiff controls the playing field.”

Depp is suing Heard for $50 million in Fairfax County Circuit Court after Heard wrote a December 2018 op-ed piece in The Washington Post describing herself as “a public figure representi­ng domestic abuse.” The article never mentions Depp by name, but Depp’s lawyers say he was defamed neverthele­ss because it’s a clear reference to abuse allegation­s Heard levied in 2016, in the midst of the couple’s divorce proceeding­s.

The judge on Tuesday did say she’s reserving judgment on whether the article’s headline in online editions should be part of the libel lawsuit because she said the evidence is unclear at this point whether Heard wrote the headline or is responsibl­e for it. The online headline reads, “I spoke up against sexual violence — and faced our culture’s wrath. That has to change.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States