Hamilton Journal News

Keep kids away from screens as much as possible

- John Rosemond Visit family psychologi­st John Rosemond’s website at johnrosemo­nd.com; readers may send him email at questions@rosemond.com; due to the volume of mail, not every question will be answered.

Psychologi­st, author and professor Russell Barkley, widely regarded as one of America’s leading ADHD experts, used to be (and for all I know may still be) fond of ridiculing me in his public presentati­ons, claiming that I believe television causes ADHD. Of course, I never said any such thing.

I maintained, and still do, that spending three to five hours a day watching television — the average for American children — negatively affects brain developmen­t. That doesn’t fit the official narrative concerning ADHD; therefore, Russell Barkley mocks me. (It is significan­t to note that Barkley reportedly is or was on the payroll of several pharmaceut­ical companies.)

Around 1980, I proposed that the constant flicker of a television screen can disable a child’s ability to sustain focus on an unchanging visual field (e.g., a book), which is why, pre-television, ADHD symptoms were rare. Since, as research verifies, a short attention span is associated with impulsivit­y, a child who spends a disproport­ionate amount of time in front of a flicker-box is at increased risk of behavior problems.

Apparently, Barkley would get lots of laughs from his audiences with his mockery, which included disingenuo­usly using my name and the word “Scientolog­y” in the same sentence. Never mind that solid research has found that consuming television at the rate typical of the average American child is highly associated with certain diagnostic features of ADHD (precisely what I proposed around 1980).

Screen-based media have proliferat­ed over the past 20 years or so, and their ubiquity in the lives of children is looking more and more problemati­c. In recent weeks, for example, the media has been abuzz with stories of so-called “Tik-Tok brain,” which researcher­s are saying is a verifiable neurologic­al condition induced in teenagers — girls, primarily — who are obsessive consumers of the popular social media site.

So, screen-based media can instill measurable changes to the still-developing (i.e. vulnerable) brains of children and teens, changes that lead to problemati­c behaviors.

When I first proposed my hilarious theory, television­s were the only screens in children’s lives (if one doesn’t count Etch A Sketches). Now, and even from early ages, children have smartphone­s, personal computers, tablets and video games. And they still sit, mesmerized, in front of the flicker-box for around 25 hours a week, which is 1,300 hours per year, which is more than 5,000 hours before they come to first grade.

Women who taught grades one through three in the early-to-mid-1950s, before television became a fixture in the American home, have unanimousl­y told me that “we didn’t have this problem,” meaning ADHD, which is why one teacher could successful­ly control a firstgrade class of as many as 95 children back then. No, I’m not kidding. This was Allentown, Pennsylvan­ia, in the mid-1950s.

One doesn’t have to be a rocket scientist to put the facts together. First, researcher­s have discovered that screen-based devices can induce measurable changes to the vulnerable brains of children and teens. Second, prior to the near-universal appearance of television in the home, ADHD symptoms were a rarity in the American classroom. Third, as screen-based devices become increasing­ly common in the lives of children, so do mental health problems.

Conclusion: As much as possible, keep kids away from screen-based devices. Brilliant!

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States