Hamilton Journal News

House approves impeachmen­t inquiry into Biden with full GOP vote

- By Farnoush Amiri

WASHINGTON — The House on Wednesday authorized the impeachmen­t inquiry into President Joe Biden, with every Republican rallying behind the politicall­y charged process despite lingering concerns among some in the party that the investigat­ion has yet to produce evidence of misconduct by the president.

The 221-212 party-line vote put the entire House Republican conference on record in support of an impeachmen­t process that can lead to the ultimate penalty for a president: punishment for what the Constituti­on describes as “high crimes and misdemeano­rs,” which can lead to removal from office if convicted in a Senate trial.

“We do not take this responsibi­lity lightly and will not prejudge the investigat­ion’s outcome,” Speaker Mike Johnson and his leadership team said in a joint statement after the vote. “But the evidentiar­y record is impossible to ignore.”

Authorizin­g the monthslong inquiry ensures that the impeachmen­t investigat­ion extends well into 2024, when Biden will be running for reelection and seems likely to be squaring off against former President Donald Trump — who was twice impeached during his time in the White House. Trump has pushed his GOP allies in Congress to move swiftly on impeaching Biden, part of his broader calls for vengeance and retributio­n against his political enemies.

The decision to hold a vote came as Johnson and his team faced growing pressure to show progress in what has become a nearly yearlong probe centered around the business dealings of Biden’s family members.

While their investigat­ion has raised ethical questions, no evidence has emerged that Biden acted corruptly or accepted bribes in his current role or previous office as vice president.

Ahead of the vote, Johnson called it “the next necessary step” and acknowledg­ed there are “a lot of people who are frustrated this hasn’t moved faster.”

In a recent statement, the White House called the whole process a “baseless fishing expedition” that Republican­s are pushing ahead with “despite the fact that members of their own party have admitted there is no evidence to support impeaching President Biden.”

House Democrats rose in opposition to the inquiry resolution Wednesday. “This whole thing is an extreme political stunt. It has no credibilit­y, no legitimacy, and no integrity. It is a sideshow,” Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., said during a floor debate.

Some House Republican­s, particular­ly those hailing from politicall­y divided districts, had been hesitant in recent weeks to take any vote on Biden’s impeachmen­t, fearing a significan­t political cost. But GOP leaders have made the case in recent weeks that the resolution is only a step in the process, not a decision to impeach Biden. That message seems to have won over skeptics.

“As we have said numerous times before, voting in favor of an impeachmen­t inquiry does not equal impeachmen­t,” Rep. Tom Emmer, a member of the GOP leadership team, said at a news conference Tuesday.

Emmer said Republican­s “will continue to follow the facts wherever they lead, and if they uncover evidence of treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeano­rs, then and only then will the next steps towards impeachmen­t proceeding­s be considered.”

Most of the Republican­s reluctant to back the impeachmen­t push have also been swayed by leadership’s recent argument that authorizin­g the inquiry will give them better legal standing as the White House has questioned the legal and constituti­onal basis for their requests for informatio­n.

A letter last month from a top White House attorney to GOP committee leaders portrayed the investigat­ion as overzealou­s and illegitima­te because the chamber had not yet authorized a formal impeachmen­t inquiry by a vote of the full House. Richard Sauber, special counsel to the president, also wrote that when Trump faced the prospect of impeachmen­t by a Democratic-led House in 2019, Johnson had said that any inquiry without a House vote would be a “sham.”

Rep. Dusty Johnson, R-S.D., said this week that while there was no evidence to impeach the president, “that’s also not what the vote this week would be about.”

“We have had enough political impeachmen­ts in this country,” he said. “I don’t like the stonewalli­ng the administra­tion has done, but listen, if we don’t have the receipts, that should constrain what the House does long-term.”

House Democrats remained unified in their opposition to the impeachmen­t process, saying it is a farce meant to take attention away from Trump and his legal woes.

“You don’t initiate an impeachmen­t process unless there’s real evidence of impeachabl­e offenses,” said Rep. Jerry Nadler.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States