Hartford Courant (Sunday)

Old Gadgets An Explosive Problem

Volatile Batteries In iPads, iPhones And Other Tech Can Catch Fire During Recycling Process

- By GEOFFREY A. FOWLER The Washington Post

MADISON, WIS. – What happens to gadgets when you’re done with them? Too often, they explode. As we enter new-gadget buying season, spare a moment to meet the people who end up handling your old stuff. Isauro Flores-Hernandez, who takes apart used smartphone­s and tablets for a living, keeps thick gloves, metal tongs and a red fireproof bin by his desk here at Cascade Asset Management, an electronic­s scrap processor. He uses them to whisk away devices with batteries that burst into flames when he opens them for recycling.

One corner of his desk is charred from an Apple iPhone that began smoking and then exploded after he opened it in 2016. Last year, his co-worker had to slide away an exploding iPad battery and evacuate the area while it burned out.

Around the world, garbage trucks and recycling centers are going up in flames. The root of the problem: volatile lithium-ion batteries sealed inside our favorite electronic­s from Apple, Samsung, Microsoft and more. They’re not only dangerous but also difficult to take apart — making e-waste less profitable and contributi­ng to a growing recycling crisis.

These days, rechargeab­le lithium-ion batteries are in smartphone­s, tablets, laptops, ear buds, toys, power tools, scooters, hoverboard­s and e-cigarettes.

A ‘Thermal Event’

For all their benefits at making our devices slim, powerful and easy to recharge, lithium-ion batteries have some big costs. They contain Cobalt, often mined in inhumane circumstan­ces in places like the Congo. And when crushed, punctured, ripped or dropped, lithium-ion batteries can produce what the industry euphemisti­cally calls a “thermal event.” It happens because these batteries short circuit when the super-thin separator between their positive and negative parts gets breached. Remember Samsung’s exploding Note 7 smartphone? That was a lithium-ion thermal event.

Old devices end up in trouble when we throw them in the trash, stick them in the recycling bin, or even responsibl­y bring them to an e-waste center. There isn’t official data on these fires, but the anecdotal evidence is stark. Since the spring of 2018 alone, batteries have been suspected as the cause of recycling fires in New York, Arizona, Florida, Wisconsin, Indiana, Idaho, Scotland, Australia and New Zealand. In California, a recent survey of waste management facilities found 83 percent had at least one fire over the last two years, of which 40 percent were caused by lithium-ion batteries.

Statistica­lly, the fire rates are low — 1 out of 3,000 mobile device batteries that Cascade handles experience­s a thermal event. But when batteries spark other material, the result can be catastroph­ic. In 2016, the Shoreway Environmen­tal Center that serves Silicon Valley suffered a 4-alarm fire it suspects was caused by a lithium-ion battery that went undetected amid other junk in its sorting systems. The fire damage cost $8.5 million.

There’s plenty of blame to go around. People shouldn’t carelessly throw battery-powered electronic­s into the bin. Local government­s haven’t figured out good ways for us to hand off of this common but dangerous material. The tech press (including me) should write less about shiny new things and more about how to make old stuff last longer. Some gadget makers, including Apple, are taking steps to make recycling easier.

But ultimately, this is an environmen­tal problem of the tech industry’s own design. And it’s time they own it.

It’s bad enough that lithium-ion batteries are dangerous. But often, gadgets designed to be thin and portable make the batteries especially difficult to remove.

To see it like a recycler, I spent a day with Flores-Hernandez at Cascade, the e-waste company in Wisconsin. It takes in all kinds of electronic­s from businesses that pay it to wipe data and recycle — some 257,000 items last year. When it can, Cascade refurbishe­s devices or harvests valuable parts. When stuff is too old, Cascade pulls it apart and tries to salvage commoditie­s.

Removing Batteries By Hand

That’s easier said than done with some of our favorite mobile devices. Out of his stack of used tablets, Flores-Hernandez shows me a 6-year-old iPad with a shattered screen. Before it could be sent to a shredder, which separates the materials that can be melted down, he has to get out the battery — by hand.

I should have taken a seat — the process took 40 minutes. To get to the battery, first Flores-Hernandez has to remove the electronic­s on top of it. Step one: He puts the iPad on a 100-degree heating plate for about four minutes to loosen glue that adheres the screen. Then off comes broken glass, the screen and dozens of tiny screws.

There’s no indication Apple products are more likely to catch fire than other devices (though Cascade says they’ve been the source of all their fires since 2015). But iPads are more difficult to take apart. “On a scale of 1 to 10, I would say this is an 8 or 9,” says Flores-Hernandez.

He learned how to do this through a training program from iFixit, an online repair community. Apple and many other manufactur­ers don’t provide instructio­ns or analysis software to recyclers like Cascade. Handling this stuff is tricky even for its makers: Apple stores in Switzerlan­d, Spain and the Netherland­s have all experience­d battery fires in 2018.

About 30 minutes into iPad surgery comes the most delicate part: prying out the battery glued to the back of the iPad. After heating the iPad again to loosen glue, he uses a series of plastic squeegees to nudge the battery — as flat as a plastic comb and almost as wide as the iPad — out bit by bit.

“Don’t bend it. Don’t poke it. Just try to go slow,” says Flores-Hernandez.

I hold my breath. Our iPad doesn’t explode. This time.

Smaller gadgets with lithium-ion batteries like vape pens and headphones are more difficult to detect in a pile of waste, and can be even harder to disassembl­e. Apple’s wireless AirPods, for one, have been dubbed all but impossible to recycle by iFixit because they contain three batteries, each sealed inside plastic.

It’s more than just a safety issue, says Cascade’s CEO Neil Peters-Michaud. Gluing components together and hiding the batteries also makes recycling less profitable. For the training, safety precaution­s and effort that went into removing that iPad battery, Cascade will make about 50 cents to $1 in commoditie­s. “Labor and time are money,” Peters-Michaud says.

“I just don’t understand why Apple doesn’t include design features that its users and the reuse-and-recycling community can benefit from to extend the life of their products safely,” he says.

Reaching A Pivot Point

The risk is that devices like old iPads could become unrecyclab­le, at least in economic terms, for scrap companies that aren’t getting paid some other way. Today, firms can still make money by reselling iPads. But who’s going to process all the old iPads currently marooned in drawers, losing their market value?

“We are reaching the pivot point that it is a more costly process to separate the materials than the value of the materials that can be recovered,” says Craig Boswell, the co-founder HOBI Internatio­nal, an e-waste company with locations in Arizona, Illinois and Texas. “That applies not only to the iPad, but most of the designs that have internally sealed batteries.”

Gadgets don’t have to be designed this way. In 2014, Samsung’s flagship Galaxy S5 smartphone had a rechargeab­le battery that could be easily removed. My old PalmPilot used two AAA alkaline batteries that just pop out. Removable batteries could have helped Apple avoid the debacle in which it got caught slowing iPhones with worn-out batteries — and then had to offer discounted battery replacemen­ts to get back in our good graces.

The sealed approach makes electronic­s thinner, which the companies say we want — removable batteries require additional shielding that takes up space. Sealing in a battery with a life span of just a few years is also a way to force customers to upgrade, though tech giants have said they’re not baking planned obsolescen­ce into their designs.

Apple wouldn’t answer my questions on its practices.

Apple, which does more for concerns like clean energy and hazardous chemicals than most big tech firms, is hardly alone in designing products with recycling challenges.

Designing For Repair

Last year, Greenpeace graded companies for their overall environmen­tal impact. That included a grade for “product life extension,” a measure of how products are designed to be taken apart for repair, reuse and recycling. Most firms, including Apple, Microsoft and Samsung, got Ds in that category.

They could take a lesson from HP, awarded an A by Greenpeace for product life extension. It makes products that are easily upgraded and taken apart (including laptops and tablets with replaceabl­e batteries) and it shares repair and disassembl­y instructio­ns widely.

“Designing for repair makes a huge difference in the life cycle impact of the product,” says Gary Cook, a senior corporate campaigner at Greenpeace. Some tech companies, including Apple, have actively opposed so-called “right to repair” legislatio­n that would require companies to share informatio­n on how to take apart products.

Apple has made some public commitment­s on recycling. It offers a take-back program, where it pays for products to be properly recycled at facilities it vets. Apple hasn’t disclosed how much of the material it creates that it takes back, but other recyclers tell me it’s likely a fraction. An industry-funded program called Call2Recyc­le last year collected 2.7 million pounds of lithium-ion batteries, which it said represents a “single digit percentage” of all the ones sold in the U.S.

Most people I spoke to in the recycling industry agree there’s a better fix: Go back to removable batteries.

“You can have very elegant design and high-energy density,” says Carl Smith, the CEO of Call2Recyc­le. “I don’t think those are two totally independen­t notions.”

So as a gadget reviewer, let me say this clearly to the tech industry: Give up your thin obsession. We’ll happily take electronic­s with a little extra junk in the trunk if it means we can easily replace batteries to make them last longer — and feel more confident they won’t end up igniting a recycling inferno.

 ?? GEOFFREY A. FOWLER | THE WASHINGTON POST ?? ISAURO FLORES-HERNANDEZ takes apart used smartphone­s and tablets for a living at Cascade Asset Management, an electronic­s scrap processor in Madison, Wis.
GEOFFREY A. FOWLER | THE WASHINGTON POST ISAURO FLORES-HERNANDEZ takes apart used smartphone­s and tablets for a living at Cascade Asset Management, an electronic­s scrap processor in Madison, Wis.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States