Hartford Courant (Sunday)

‘Rodgers Rule’ Has Defenders’ Attention

Sparks Rise In Roughing Penalties

- By BEN GOESSLING Minneapoli­s Star Tribune

The comeback Aaron Rodgers orchestrat­ed last Sunday night, both from his own left knee sprain and from the 20-0 deficit the Green Bay Packers faced against the Chicago Bears, has turned the eyes of the NFL’s pundit class toward Lambeau Field in Week 2, as the league’s juiciest storyline centers primarily on whether Rodgers will play Sunday against the Vikings.

That has made the rule change triggered by Rodgers’ last matchup with the Vikings — when he broke his right collarbone on a hit from Vikings linebacker Anthony Barr — more of a subplot than an animating force of drama this weekend. Rodgers wasn’t asked about the hit during his weekly media session Wednesday, and when Barr was asked Thursday if he’ll make a point of seeking out Rodgers before Sunday’s game, he said: “I’m going about my normal business. I don’t usually talk to opponents before the game, so I’m not too concerned about that.”

But the effects of the “Aaron Rodgers Rule” — which penalizes defenders for landing on a quarterbac­k with all or most of their weight as the passer sets up to throw — are alive and well in the first weeks of the season. There were 15 flags for roughing-the-passer penalties in the opening week; five, including the one assessed to Vikings defensive tackle Sheldon Richardson against the 49ers, were for defenders who landed with their body weight on a QB.

“I think [Richardson’s penalty] was valid,” Barr said. “That was a pretty clear call as to what we’ve been told the last few months. So I understand that one. You’ve just got to continue to be aware of it, and make sure you’re playing by the rules.”

Playing by the rules, such as they are, has been the challenge for defenders in the wake of the league’s new efforts to protect quarterbac­ks when they’re out of the pocket. While they’re aware of the need to play within the new statutes brought on in part by Barr’s hit on Rodgers last Oct. 15, they’re still trying to figure out how to adhere to the rules without ceding too much ground to offensive players — particular­ly those like Rodgers, whose mobility makes him an additional threat.

“I think you try to play as normal as possible, maybe up until the point where you bring the guy down, and then try to ease off a bit. But to that point, you’ve got to keep playing,” Barr said. “You don’t want to ease up on the quarterbac­k and he takes off right by you. It’s tough, but it’s important to continue to be conscious of that.”

Even Rodgers’ teammates, grateful as they are to have their quarterbac­k on the field once again, seem flustered by the rule.

Linebacker Clay Matthews was flagged for roughing the passer after hitting Mitch Trubisky on Sunday night, extending the Bears’ late comeback bid after Rodgers’ 75-yard touchdown to Randall Cobb gave the Packers the lead. Matthews said Wednesday that “you can make a case for my hit late in the game as being [a late hit]” but added the Packers had penalties called on Muhammad Wilkerson and Nick Perry “that I just did not agree with.”

“I heard some stat about, it was the most roughing-thepasser penalties called since, you know, whenever,” Matthews said. “I think they’re just trying to put an emphasis on quarterbac­k hits and unnecessar­y quarterbac­k hits. But, obviously, when you’re on defense, you feel it’s skewed toward the offense, especially the quarterbac­k position.”

According to Stats LLC, roughing-the-passer penalties made up 5.9 percent of the flags thrown in Week 1, nearly double the 3.1 percent share of penalties that roughing-the-passer calls represente­d last year.

It’s possible the rule will be relaxed in time, or that players will be able to retrain themselves to comply with the new standards.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States