Hartford Courant (Sunday)

Keep talking about a ‘public option’

-

There’s no question that health care is expensive — for many, prohibitiv­ely so — and it was encouragin­g that Connecticu­t legislator­s had been working so closely with the insurance industry here to find a way to lower costs by involving the state in the process.

But it was deeply disappoint­ing that the discussion imploded last week, shortly after Gov. Ned Lamont and legislativ­e leaders announced a plan that had merit.

Despite the apparent failure of the so-called “Connecticu­t Option,” though, some sort of public option for health insurance — in which government­s allow businesses or individual­s to buy into a state-run plan — is an idea worth pursuing, and local insurance and government leaders must continue to work together.

In the coming months, we should expect the national debate over health care and “Medicare for All” to heat up. Connecticu­t can, and should, drive the conversati­on. With the insurance industry inextricab­ly woven into the state’s economic and political fabric, Connecticu­t is the natural leader on the issue, even though Washington recently became the first state in the nation to create a public option.

A Connecticu­t bill was unveiled in March, and many changes and amendments were incorporat­ed along the way.

Some parts of the evolving plan were clearly positive. For example, it would have created a state-sponsored insurance plan for individual­s and businesses with fewer than 50 employees, and it would have required insurance companies to offer plans to them that were 20 percent cheaper than average plans. The bill also added a tax on opioids to help expand HUSKY, the state’s Medicaid program, to tens of thousands of low-income people who lost eligibilit­y in 2016. It also would have allowed state officials to ask the federal government for approval to import cheaper prescripti­on drugs from Canada. Some of those components could be pursued independen­tly of a broader plan.

For reasons that might never become fully transparen­t to the public, negotiatio­ns between Connecticu­t legislator­s and the insurance industry that had been going on for months came apart in the last week. Comptrolle­r Kevin Lembo told The Courant’s editorial board on Wednesday that the Connecticu­t option “is dead” and said insurer Cigna had finally torpedoed it with a threat to reconsider whether to stay in Connecticu­t if the bill passed.

But insurers had already grown more full-throated in their opposition to the bill, even as legislator­s were celebratin­g it. In a letter to Mr. Lamont last week, representa­tives of Aetna, Anthem Inc., Cigna Corp., ConnectiCa­re, Harvard Pilgrim and United Healthcare wrote, “Bills of this magnitude, representi­ng a fundamenta­l and material change to insurance market operations and regulation, require careful and thoughtful considerat­ion to avoid unintended consequenc­es that could have a deleteriou­s effect on job growth and economic developmen­t.”

That is a reasonable criticism. Mr. Lamont’s casual attitude toward the lack of research concerning the costs of the plan was worrying. Noting that the state would have two years to get all the pieces lined up, he said, “There will be plenty of insight going forward.”

That’s not how government works. Pass the law when the numbers have been crunched, when you have industry buy-in, when you have reasonable certainty concerning how the legislatio­n will help people and how much it will cost.

Nobody was certain how the plan would work, economical­ly. Part of it relied on federal approval for reinsuranc­e, for example, to avoid a situation where the pool of participan­ts became too high-risk. It also created a new layer of bureaucrac­y in Connecticu­t, a move that should give pause. It would cost only $1 million to set up and find staff to manage the operation, according to the fiscal analysis, but it opens the door to escalating costs.

The conversati­on over health care has been evolving for decades. Connecticu­t and the insurance industry appear to have missed a chance to plot a cooperativ­e path forward this spring, but their voices can still carry.

Don’t give up.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States