Hartford Courant (Sunday)

People turn to internet for an STD diagnosis

Doctors worry web spreads misinforma­tion

- By Dennis Thompson

The HIV test came back positive and the patient, full of fear and denial, took to the STD forum on the popular social media site Reddit.

“I’m really scared because they said my results showed ‘HIV-1 Confirmati­on.’ I have to go back and get another test but I’m wondering is the doc wrong, do you think I have HIV?” the person wrote.

People worried that they have a sexually transmitte­d disease are more often turning to social media to receive a diagnosis, according to a report published in November in the Journal of the American Medical Associatio­n.

Nearly 3 of every 5 posts to Reddit’s STD forum are seeking a “crowd diagnosis” of a suspected infection, often with an accompanyi­ng photo of affected genitalia, said senior researcher John Ayers. He’s an associate professor with the Division of Infectious Disease and Global Public Health at the University of California at San Diego.

Worse, 20% of people requesting an STD crowd diagnosis through Reddit specifical­ly sought a second opinion after receiving a diagnosis by a health care profession­al.

“One in 5 people that went on here was already told by a doctor what their condition was,” Ayers said. “They go on social media to refute that diagnosis.”

He said the phenomenon is disturbing, and not just because it takes the dreaded office question, “Does this look normal?” to a global scale.

There’s a good chance that people are being given misleading or wrong informatio­n, which increases the risk of spreading the infection to others, Ayers said.

“We’re undergoing an STD epidemic right now, and in part that epidemic may be fueled by people’s reliance on social media for health care,” he said.

Ayers cited the frightened HIV-positive patient as an example. That post received a reply within an hour, researcher­s found.

“They go online and they get told they don’t have HIV, which means that person is going to go now and infect more people,” Ayers said.

The rates of new HIV diagnoses in the U.S. have remained stable in recent years, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but infection rates for other STDs are skyrocketi­ng:

Chlamydia infections are up 19% since 2014, and now stand at 1.8 million.

There’s been a 63% increase in gonorrhea cases during that time, to more than 583,400.

Primary and secondary syphilis are up 71%, with more than 35,000 cases.

Congenital syphilis passed from mother to baby has increased 185%, with more than 1,300 cases.

Ayers and his colleagues noted that people are increasing­ly turning to social media for informatio­n about STDs and other illnesses.

“Remote care” and “telemedici­ne” are concepts that have been kicking around for some time, but doctors may be surprised by the extent to which people already are participat­ing, Ayers said.

“People are already doing remote care. They’re just doing it in the wrong setting. They’re doing it on social media,” he said.

To gain some understand­ing, the researcher­s focused on Reddit, a social media website with 330 million active monthly users. The site hosts more than 232 health forums, also called “subreddits,” including one focused on STDs.

“None of them are dedicated to diagnosis,” Ayers said. “They’re all about sharing informatio­n and social support. But the reality is they all turn into a forum for crowd diagnoses.”

Ayers and his team gathered posts on Reddit’s STD forum from its start in November 2010 through February 2019, nearly 17,000 in all.

The monthly number of posts have been increasing over the years, with 908 appearing in January and February 2019.

Researcher­s drew a random sample of 500 posts to see how many were seeking crowd diagnoses.

About 58% of posts requested a crowd diagnosis. Nearly onethird of those requests included a photo of the person’s physical symptoms, “which basically meant they were sexting, for want of a better word,” Ayers said.

Nearly 9 out of 10 requests for a crowd diagnosis received a reply, and many received multiple replies, Ayers said. Some posts received a reply in less than a minute.

He noted that 79% of requests were answered in less than a day. “Try getting a doctor’s opinion in that time,” Ayers said.

Dr. Stacey Rizza is an infectious disease expert at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, who reviewed the findings. She said she’s alarmed that people are turning to social media rather than doctors to deal with their STDs.

“In my opinion, I don’t think that’s the appropriat­e way to diagnose anything,” Rizza said. “But in infectious diseases, it’s not just that one person. Other people will be impacted too.”

While it is concerning, Dr. Amesh Adalja sees opportunit­y in the trend as well.

“This phenomenon should be seen as an opportunit­y for health care providers to engage with patients on social media to ensure accurate diagnosis and advice is being given,” said Adalja, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center on

Health Security in Baltimore who also reviewed the study. “Exploiting the ease of social media inquiry will likely become an increasing­ly important way to interact with patients.”

Ayers agreed. He said public health officials and organizati­ons should partner with social media platforms to improve the informatio­n being shared and make sure people are turning to their doctor for a proper diagnosis.

 ?? GETTY ?? People worried that they have a sexually transmitte­d disease are more often turning to social media to receive a diagnosis.
GETTY People worried that they have a sexually transmitte­d disease are more often turning to social media to receive a diagnosis.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States