Hartford Courant (Sunday)

Americans are failing at creating herd immunity

- David Brooks Brooks is a columnist for The New York Times.

Could today’s version of America have been able to win World War II? It hardly seems possible.

That victory required national cohesion, voluntary sacrifice for the common good and trust in institutio­ns and each other. America’s response to COVID-19 suggests that we no longer have sufficient quantities of any of those things.

In 2020 Americans failed to socially distance and test for the coronaviru­s and suffered among the highest infection and death rates in the developed world. Millions decided that wearing a mask infringed their individual liberty.

My Times colleague Apoorva Mandavilli reported that experts now believe that America will not achieve herd immunity anytime soon. Instead of largely beating this disease, it could linger, as a more manageable threat, for generation­s. A major reason is that about 30% of the U.S. population is reluctant to get vaccinated.

We’re not asking you to storm the beaches of Iwo Jima; we’re asking you to walk into a damn CVS.

Americans have always been an individual­istic people who don’t like being told what to do. But in times of crisis, they have historical­ly still had the capacity to form what Alexis de Tocquevill­e called a “social body,” a coherent community capable of collective action. During World War I, for example, millions served at home and abroad to win a faraway war, responding to recruiting posters that read “I Want You” and “Americans All.”

That basic sense of belonging to a common enterprise with a shared destiny is what’s lacking today. Researcher­s and reporters who talk to the vaccine-hesitant find that the levels of distrust, suspicion and alienation that have marred politics are now thwarting the vaccinatio­n process. They find people who doubt the competence of the medical establishm­ent or any establishm­ent, who assume as a matter of course that their fellow countrymen are out to con, deceive and harm them.

This “the only person you can trust is yourself ” mentality has a tendency to cause people to conceive of themselves as individual­s and not as citizens. Derek Thompson of The Atlantic recently contacted more than a dozen people who were refusing to get a COVID-19 vaccine. They often used an argument you’ve probably heard too: I’m not especially vulnerable. I may have already gotten the virus. If I get it in the future, it won’t be that bad. Why should I take a risk on an experiment­al vaccine?

They are reasoning mostly on a personal basis. They are thinking about what’s right for them as individual­s more than what’s right for the nation and the most vulnerable people in it. It’s not that they are rebuking their responsibi­lities as citizens; it apparently never occurs to them that they might have any. When Thompson asked them to think in broader terms, they seemed surprised and off balance.

Most of the time distrust is earned distrust. Trust levels in any society tend to be reasonably accurate representa­tions of how trustworth­y that society has been. Trust is the ratio of the times someone has shown up for you versus the times somebody has betrayed you. Marginaliz­ed groups tend to be the most distrustfu­l, for good reasons — they’ve been betrayed.

The other thing to say is that once it is establishe­d, distrust tends to accelerate. If you distrust the people around you because you think they have bad values or are out to hurt you, then you are going to be slow to reach out to solve common problems. Your problems will have a tendency to get worse, which seems to justify and then magnify your distrust. You have entered a distrust doom loop.

A lot of Americans have seceded from the cultural, political and social institutio­ns of national life. As a result, the nation finds it hard to perform collective action.

How do you rebuild trust? At the national level you demonstrat­e to people in concrete ways that they are not forgotten, that someone is coming through for them.

Which brings us to Joe Biden. The Biden agenda would pour trillions of dollars into precisely those population­s who have been left out and are most distrustfu­l — the people who used to work in manufactur­ing and who might now get infrastruc­ture jobs, or the ones who care for the elderly.

The New Deal was an act of social solidarity that created the national cohesion we needed to win World War II. I am not in the habit of supporting massive federal spending proposals. But in this specific context — in the midst of a distrust doom loop — this is our best shot of reversing the decline.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States