Hartford Courant (Sunday)

Rally opposes sale of Courant parent

Residents, politician­s and reporters protest possible deal between Tribune, hedge fund

- By Lori Riley

HARTFORD — Community members and journalist­s, along with Sen. Richard Blumenthal and Mayor Luke Bronin, gathered Saturday afternoon in Hartford for a rally opposing the sale of the Courant and Tribune Publishing to Alden Global Capital, a hedge fund with a reputation for cutting costs.

The “Save Local News” rally came less than a week before shareholde­rs vote on May 21 on a deal to sell Tribune Publishing to Alden for $633 million. A rival group, led by Maryland hotel magnate Stewart Bainum, is attempting to assemble a competing bid for the papers that make up Tribune publishing. Bainum would sell at least some of Tribune’s papers, including the Courant, to local owners.

“No matter how many times I want to call up and disagree with a story, I’m grateful there’s

continue — and allow the private sector to take over and figure out what to do from here. I don’t mean to be defeatist, but that’s kind of what I’m hearing.”

That’s a definite end-ofthe-world scenario — only in this case it doesn’t end with fire, but the dousing of it.

So what happens now? What if MIRA can’t persuade the DEEP to accept its position — which is that the current DEEP-issued permit to operate the South Meadows plant waste facility will enable MIRA to use it as a non-trash-burning transfer station, which can export as much as 680 tons of garbage per day?

MIRA’s president, Thomas Kirk, said Thursday he’ll be sending DEEP Commission­er Katie Dykes a letter next week in hopes that MIRA and DEEP can work out their difference­s about whether the MIRA needs to go through a time-consuming applicatio­n-and-hearing process (which would be further complicate­d by a new “environmen­tal justice” law that gives municipali­ties a lot more say about what happens, garbagewis­e, within their borders).

Kirk wrote a “draft” letter to Dyke about a week ago in an effort to begin to resolve the dispute over permit requiremen­ts, or at least establish for the record where MIRA stands and what actions it needs to take.

Isner’s appearance and comments at Wednesday’s meeting were an initial response to that draft letter, and now Kirk said he’ll refine the letter and submit a final version to Dykes for an authoritat­ive answer.

In the draft, Kirk wrote: “As MIRA has previously discussed with you and other DEEP personnel, MIRA is developing plans to cease the shredding and combustion of MSW at the Facility for energy recovery, effective on or about June 30, 2022. This decision is driven by the economic reality that MIRA’s declining energy revenue combined with the operationa­l, maintenanc­e and capital costs associated with maintainin­g the waste-to-energy components of the Facility is pushing the tipping fee [per ton of garbage] charged by MIRA to a level above what the market will bear.”

Lamont unenthusia­stic

There’s also a political dimension to the decision to shut down the plant, exemplifie­d by Gov. Ned Lamont’s rejection of state funding for a proposed $330 million upgrade of the Hartford power plant. Lamont said he couldn’t see “sending hundreds of millions of state taxpayer or electric ratepayer dollars to MIRA to attempt to keep a failing, decades-old facility running, right here in Hartford, where it impacts our vulnerable residents.”

DEEP also hasn’t backed MIRA’s proposals for a solution that would keep the trash-burning plant operating, Shanley said Wednesday.

Kirk went on in his draft letter to Dykes: “MIRA is anticipati­ng that it will still have a contractua­l obligation through June 30, 2027 to ensure the proper disposal of waste generated by 48 Connecticu­t municipali­ties that have signed Tier 1 Long-Term Municipal Service Agreements (MSAs) with MIRA. The annual tonnage ... is approximat­ely 440,000 tons ... which MIRA will manage through its network of three regional transfer stations and the [Hartford] Facility . ...

MIRA intends to utilize the existing authority under Solid Waste Permit No. 06401260-PO to manage the received [municipal solid waste] for off-site transfer to other properly-permitted solid waste management facilities . ... Specifical­ly, the permitted limits [are] for the off-site transfer of up to 680 tons of [garbage] per day, seven days per week.”

Isner, the DEEP official, doubted that the existing permit would give MIRA authority to ship out that garbage without either an applicatio­n for a modificati­on or an entirely new permit.

“We understand and read the permit a little differentl­y,” Kirk told Government Watch on Thursday. “The plain words of the permit would support a different [interpreta­tion] that says we can transfer 680 tons a day out of the facility, and we think it clearly allows us to operate as a transfer station.”

Although the difference­s between the MIRA and DEEP positions may not be easily resolved, Kirk asked Dykes for a quick response. In the draft letter, to be submitted in final form in coming days, he wrote: “Given the critically short time period remaining for MIRA to execute this waste transfer plan, MIRA respectful­ly requests that DEEP respond to this letter confirming the DEEP position as soon as possible, but no later than June 1, 2021.

“Until MIRA receives a response from DEEP regarding this critical issue, MIRA will continue its planning with the understand­ing that the currently permitted authority for the off-site transfer of up to 680 tons of [municipal waste] per day, seven days per week, remains in effect, until and upon the current permit’s expiration or surrender to DEEP.

“MIRA is making this request to the DEEP in order to see if we can collaborat­e and find a path forward together, which is MIRA’s goal. MIRA, however, reserves all rights and arguments it has under the Permit and/or otherwise available to it in law to exercise and does not waive or relinquish any such rights it has now or in the future relating to the Permit, available legal options, and MIRA’s authority.”

Asked Thursday what will happen if DEEP does not relent, Kirk said, “We’re going to have to find a home for about 450,000 tons” per year of municipal waste that’s now being burned but won’t be after July 1, 2022.

If MIRA isn’t allowed to use the Hartford site as a transfer station, he said there are “private sector alternativ­es” that include “a handful of transfer stations across the state,” including sites in South Windsor and Willimanti­c, for example. The costs of using them are uncertain, he said.

As it is, MIRA will be increasing its fee to the towns per ton on July 1, from the current $93 up to $105.

Severance for contractor’s employees

Another complicati­on of the impending trash-to-energy plant’s shutdown will be the loss of jobs for most of the 117 workers who operate not only the plant, but also four seldom-used, auxiliary electric generators on the site that are powered by jet engines. The workers are employed by NAES Corp., an internatio­nal operator of power generation facilities, under a long-term contract with MIRA.

On Wednesday, the MIRA board took the unusual step of approving a $2.4 million severance plan for the NAES employees, which Kirk said also includes funds for retaining key NAES personnel at the MIRA plant through the scheduled end of its operation in mid-2022.

Some key NAES people have skills that could easily be marketed elsewhere, and if they left in the months leading up to the scheduled shutdown, Kirk said the plant might have to cease operations early. If that happened, Kirk said, it could easily cost MIRA more to get rid of the trash buildup than to continue paying the personnel.

He admitted the move is “certainly not typical,” but said that under this arrangemen­t, “NAES is essentiall­y a labor broker,” and MIRA reimburses the company dollar-for-dollar for “everything it takes to run the plant — [from] salaries and diesel fuel, to paper clips.”

The severance would be six weeks’ pay, and the retention payments could last 10 weeks, Kirk said. “I think it’s a recognitio­n of the difficulty” of the situation for the workers, as well as “their loyalty to MIRA and its customers” over the years.

Jon Lender is a reporter on The Courant’s investigat­ive desk, with a focus on government and politics. Contact him at jlender@ courant.com, 860-241-6524, or c/o The Hartford Courant, P.O. Box 569, Hartford, CT 06141-0569 and find him on Twitter @jonlender.

 ?? KASSI JACKSON/HARTFORD COURANT ?? Community members rallied Saturday to oppose the sale of the Courant and Tribune Publishing to a hedge fund.
KASSI JACKSON/HARTFORD COURANT Community members rallied Saturday to oppose the sale of the Courant and Tribune Publishing to a hedge fund.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States