Hartford Courant (Sunday)

Celtics suffer stunning collapse in embarrassi­ng defeat vs. Nets

- By Steve Hewitt

BOSTON — After the final buzzer sounded, when their disastrous, stunning collapse was over, the Celtics locker room was mostly quiet.

There wasn’t much to say.

There wasn’t much of a hint of frustratio­n or much anger either.

“Everything we did out there kind of spoke for itself,” Jaylen Brown said.

The Celtics have looked the part of a serious championsh­ip contender for most of this season, and on Friday night they continued to do so in another dominant first quarter against the Nets.

But then – for most of the next three quarters – the Celtics reverted to the worst version of themselves.

A disaster unfolded at TD Garden, and the Celtics were simply unable to stop it. They led by 28 in the first half, only to watch it slip away in embarrassi­ng fashion.

They got too comfortabl­e, too careless, and as it concluded boos followed them to the locker room after they were handed a humbling and inexcusabl­e 115-105 loss by the Nets.

The Celtics committed 19 turnovers and shot just 9-for-30 from 3-point range. And once the Nets started rolling after getting blown out midway through the second quarter, the C’s never regained their composure – which they’ve done this season even when they’ve blown leads.

“That was the first time we couldn’t get it back,”

Celtics coach Joe Mazzulla said. “We’ve done a good job of maintainin­g our composure and our poise for the majority of the season. I think in moments like that, when the other team starts to play well and changes their mindset, we just have to kind of adjust to your environmen­t. It’s hard. …

“I don’t think most guys realize the potency of runs in the NBA because of the pace and the 3-point shot. I think our team definitely respects other teams. Like I said, I think this is a one-off. It’s something that’s happened very, very rarely.”

Brown scored 35 points and Jayson Tatum – who went 0-for-8 from 3-point range – added 22 as the Celtics were humiliated.

The embarrassi­ng loss snapped a streak of 10 consecutiv­e wins over the Nets, who were led by Mikal Bridges’ 38 points and 10 rebounds and didn’t resemble the squad that was blown out in Boston last month.

The Celtics had delivered deja vu on the Nets — even their rebranded version without Kyrie Irving or Kevin Durant — in the first quarter.

A month ago the C’s torched the Nets by outscoring them 46-16 in the first period and never looked back in a wire-towire rout. It wasn’t as bad Friday, but the Celtics dug the Nets — who couldn’t hit the Charles River with a shot — a huge hole with a 37-15 first.

Brown looked as if he was toying with defenders as he got anything he wanted offensivel­y. The

Celtics led by 28 midway through the second quarter, but at some point maybe they got overconfid­ent. They were still up 22 late in the second when the starting lineup reentered the game and set the stage for an inexplicab­ly poor end to the first half.

The Celtics got relaxed, lackadaisi­cal and seemed to lose their focus. The Nets went on a 21-8 run to end the second quarter, with the final sequence symbolizin­g a disastrous meltdown in progress for the Celtics.

After Brown threw an inbounds pass intended for Tatum into the backcourt and out of bounds, Dorian Finney-Smith’s buzzer-beating alley-oop cut the Celtics’ lead to nine at halftime.

“That kind of got them going and got their energy up,” Derrick White said.

The Nets were only getting started on their comeback. Bridges drilled a step-back 3-pointer on the first play of the second half to set off a disastrous stretch for the Celtics.

Marcus Smart, who had zero fouls at halftime, picked up four of them in the first 3 minutes, 43 seconds of the second half, and when he subbed out picked up a technical foul from the bench.

By then, the Nets cut the deficit to one. They tied the game at 70 on Cam Johnson’s 3-pointer and took their first lead of the game when he made two free throws shortly after.

“Nothing worked,” Mazzulla admitted. “You have to battle human nature, but I’m not gonna overreact to that.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States