Hartford Courant (Sunday)

Black maternal mortality and the need for Black midwives

- By Ashleigh Evans Ashleigh Evans is a student at the Yale School of Nursing with a concentrat­ion of nursemidwi­fery.

Recently, Connecticu­t has shown a newfound interest in Black maternal mortality. Last month, Fairfield County’s Community Foundation announced their Black Maternal Health Initiative, aimed at decreasing maternal mortality by increasing access to doulas. Last year, Hartford Healthcare announced its four core pillars of actions they’re taking to improve Black maternal outcomes. The CT Health Foundation announced in October a new strategic plan to address maternal mortality in the state.

This is all for very good reason. Connecticu­t shows both significan­t and persistent racial disparitie­s in both maternal and infant health care. In the city of New Haven, for every infant born to a white mother that does not survive beyond his/her first birthday, three infants born to Black mothers will not see their first birthdays. Black mothers in the state of Connecticu­t are also 1.5 times more likely to give birth before thirty-seven weeks gestation, earning the state a C+ as a “pre-term birth grade” from the March of Dimes.

Despite the plethora of initiative­s — and the gobs of money — being thrown at Connecticu­t’s racial disparitie­s within maternal mortality, there is a key demographi­c that is continuous­ly underrepre­sented as stakeholde­rs in the conversati­on. It is the absence of these stakeholde­rs, in my opinion, that serves as a tell-tale harbinger that all of these initiative­s will fail.

The missing demographi­c is Black midwives.

A lack of representa­tion of Black midwives as key stakeholde­rs in the maternal mortality conversati­on is an indication of who holds the power when making maternal health care decisions. Despite Connecticu­t’s recent struggle with hospitals closing their maternal health care centers to save costs, hospital administra­tors are still seen as competent stakeholde­rs in combating maternal mortality. Despite decades of research demonstrat­ing midwife-attended deliveries have lower cesarean rates and fewer interventi­ons, higher rates of patient satisfacti­on and lower rates of maternal morbidity – physicians are seen as more reliable maternal care experts.

The erasure of Black midwives as decision-makers locks an ideology into place, that the money of hospital administra­tors and education of PhDs and MDs are the needed requisites of change. This ideology can be seen in the initiative­s proposed as solutions to the problem. Both Bridgeport and Fairfield counties have announced initiative­s to provide state-funded doulas to constituen­ts. The presiding notion behind legislativ­ely supporting doulas in the birth room is that doulas can serve as advocates for their clients, essentiall­y becoming a barrier to potential health care discrimina­tion that affects outcomes.

But if the birthing person has been placed in a situation in which they need protection from their health care provider, then the system has already failed them. We’re already behind the eight ball.

To be sure, both doulas and physicians play critical roles in birth work and maternal mortality. Doulas are almost guaranteed to be the only person in the room explicitly focused on the birthing person; everyone else, in some capacity, is concerned with both mother and baby. However, the implicatio­n of focusing on doulas as the solution for maternal mortality is that birthing persons need coping strategies to deal with our system as-is, instead of fundamenta­lly changing a known-flawed maternal care system. Institutin­g legislatio­n to impede bad care, stopping it (or, at the very least, providing alternativ­es to it) is bizarre. Imagine if legislatio­n came together to discuss gun violence. Instead of discussing ways to pass laws around gun control, someone recommende­d, “why don’t we give everyone bullet-proof vests?”

With one birth center in the state

(staffed nearly exclusivel­y by white women) Connecticu­t has yet to invest in the recruitmen­t and retention of Black midwives; the state can’t provide Black women with alternativ­es for maternal care. A 2023 CT Midwifery Workforce survey aimed at identifyin­g the number of practicing midwives in the state of Connecticu­t showed that, out of 74 acceptable survey responses, two respondent­s identified as Black. This is despite having not one but two nurse-midwifery programs in the state (Yale School of Nursing and Fairfield University).

As discussed by The White House Blueprint on Maternal Healthcare, Connecticu­t legislator­s serious about decreasing maternal mortality would be wise to start centering Black midwives.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States