Hartford Courant

Local officials criticize contact tracing plan

Say it is hobbled by inadequate staffing and training

- By Edmund H. Mahony and Dave Altimari

The state met Gov. Ned Lamont’s ambitious deadline for launching a contact tracing program designed to prevent recurring coronaviru­s outbreaks, but health directors on the front lines of the pandemic said it could be weeks before the program is effective because of delays associated with software, training and recruitmen­t of volunteer workers.

Lamont pushed to coordinate contact tracing with his phased reopening of the state economy beginning May 20. The state Department of Public Health launched the program May 20, but acknowledg­ed last week that more work is needed to get it running at full strength.

“Since many local health department­s already have existing protocols in place for local contact tracing, we decided that it would make more sense for them to continue doing that until they are fully comfortabl­e

with the system,” said Kristen Soto, the state health department epidemiolo­gist who has been the administra­tion point person on contact tracing. “And then have a little slower roll out of the system just to get everybody to the place where they need to be without sacrificin­g the amount or the quality of the tracing that we are able to do.”

Contact tracing programs are gearing up around the country as states emerge from selfisolat­ion. Many epidemiolo­gists consider them essential to preventing resurgent infections that, if unchecked as society reopens, could threaten again to overwhelm hospitals and create more economic havoc. Contact tracing is a time-tested method of fighting widespread viral infection by identifyin­g and eliminatin­g new cases of infection as they emerge.

The first step is a comprehens­ive testing regime to identify new infections. Under the state’s plan, volunteer tracers recruited from medical schools and guided by a sophistica­ted computer software locate those infected as well as anyone with whom the infected person has had recent close contact. The infected person and the contacts are asked to selfquaran­tine, a request that can be reinforced through the software by automated telephone calls, email or text messaging.

The state’s 64 municipal or regional health districts have always been the state’s front-line troops when it comes to contact tracing. As a group, the local health directors support the new, hi-tech effort. But last week, several said the Department of Public Health, acting under enormous pressure to restart the economy and operating with a reduced budget, has been struggling to develop an ambitious program in an unrealisti­cally short period of time.

Among other things, the directors said they are unable to properly operate the new software program, either because of lack of training or possible bugs in the operating system. Some said they hadn’t been trained, others said the training was inadequate. One director said he was given a one-hour webinar presentati­on. Most said they had not been provided with software manuals.

All of the directors said they have not been given specific offers of assistance from hundreds of volunteers the department said it has recruited, or is in the process of recruiting.

The Lamont administra­tion said it is working closely with local health directors to build “the first-of-its-kind statewide contact tracing program” and now hopes to be fully staffed by late June.

“We currently have more than 500 contact tracers registered on the platform and in the process of being trained,” said Av Harris, a spokesman for the Department of Public Health. “Residents of (Connecticu­t) have already started to receive contact tracing phone calls. We still have significan­t work to do to continue to refine the workflow and training, recruit additional contact tracers and get the system working at full capacity.”

Directors of districts around the state said they are trying to contact and trace new infections with limited staffs and without the benefit of the new computer software, since they are unable to operate it.

They said coordinati­ng the implementa­tion of contact tracing to the start of Lamont’s phase one reopening may have been overly optimistic.

“Remember, this is a very ambitious program that they are trying to develop in a very short period of time,” Glastonbur­y health director Wendy Mis said.

Farmington Valley Health District Director Jennifer Kertanis said state and local health officials have been asked to develop a state-of-the-art virus containmen­t and eliminatio­n program following a period of continuous budget cuts and the absence of investment in capital projects like computer systems. She said her health district has in recent years been funded at a rate that is 11% below the minimum level set by law.

“I don’t want any of my comments to suggest that I am throwing the state health department under the bus,” Kertanis said. “The bigger picture here is you can’t expect systems to just automatica­lly click a switch and be prepared to deal with situations of the magnitude of which we are dealing with when you have disinveste­d in your public health system for eons.”

Soto said the Department of Public Health has been “developing Connecticu­t specific instructio­ns for training purposes for our local health department­s” and has been “sharing that directly with our contact tracers both in order to help them understand how contact tracing can be done here in Connecticu­t as well as how to use this specific contact software applicatio­n.”

The software is Microsoft’s At Risk Investigat­ion and Alerting System, which Soto said is being used by four other states. The system can be accessed by a large number of users, while discrimina­ting among users who are permitted varying degrees of access to informatio­n. State health department users would have access to the greatest level of informatio­n, while health directors will be able to access data that fell within their jurisdicti­ons and volunteers would have even less access.

Microsoft Corp. has made the software available to the state at no charge for six months. The state has agreed to pay $182,000 a year if it chooses to continue to use the program.

The health department has for years operated an electronic disease surveillan­ce system, a continuous­ly updated data bank of reportable diseases such as COVID-19. That system has always delivered the reported infections to the appropriat­e health agency — local or state — for contact tracing. Under the new scheme, the infection data will now also populate the Microsoft platform, which has the capability to make automated text and voice calls to mobile telephones.

Those who test positive will receive automated text messages informing them of the results and directing them to a confidenti­al, online questionna­ire which will ask, among other things, for informatio­n about people whom they had been in close contact.

Contact tracers, presumably hundreds of volunteers recruited from university public health programs and other academic programs, would make follow-up visits to those receiving automated notificati­ons. Health directors interviewe­d last week said they had yet to receive state guidance how volunteer help would be distribute­d or on the frequency required for follow-up visits.

“We wanted a system that would give us the option to communicat­e with people in as efficient and effective way as possible,” Soto said. “So by using this system we’re able to pick up the phone and call people and talk to them directly just as we have always done. But we can also leverage text messages or email messages for people who would prefer to communicat­e electronic­ally, especially around daily check-ins for people who have been asked to stay at home because they are either sick or have been exposed to COIVID.”

Soto said last week that the department was continuing to provide access to the new software program to all state health districts, with 55 of 64 local health districts obtaining credential­s by Thursday.

“We have also provided training opportunit­ies to them in the form of a web-based walk-through to get familiar with the contact system technology as well as some written documentat­ion about the use of the system,” she said. “And we started loading statewide data into the system May 20, to correspond with the Governor’s reopening initiative. But we are doing sort of a scaled roll out and planning to be operating at our full capacity by June 1.”

Lamont has said the state expects to recruit hundreds of contact tracers from among the offices of the local health directors, from within the Department of Public Health and from medical or health career students at a variety of academic institutio­ns. Soto said the department had already identified and is preparing to give credential­s to 200 students and hopes to recruit another 300.

“There is actually a pretty large number of academic institutio­ns which we are engaging with,” Soto said. “We are working with all of the schools of public health in Connecticu­t and we are also working with some of the nursing schools, medical schools and schools of social work that have had an interest in volunteeri­ng. And this point in time we are anticipati­ng working with 200 volunteers from the Yale school of public health.”

The City of New Haven, which is operating its own contact tracing program and acquired a different software program, also has dipped into the Yale volunteer pool. New Haven Health Director Maritza Bond said the university provided 170 volunteers. So far they have made nearly 3,000 calls tracking down people who have been in contact with a person who has tested positive for the coronaviru­s.

Bond said most people who have tested positive have been cooperativ­e when contacted and asked for a list of people they’ve been in contact with over the past 48 hours.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States