Hartford Courant

Killingly power plant illogical, immoral

- By Rachel Lea Scott Rachel Lea Scott is the associate director of the Collaborat­ive Center for Justice, a Hartford-based social justice organizati­on.

State leaders have a significan­t role to play in the race to protect Connecticu­t against the worst outcomes of the climate crisis. There is a troubling disconnect between what Gov. Ned Lamont and Department of Energy and Environmen­tal Protection Commission­er Katie Dykes say they believe about fossil fuels and the actions they take on behalf of Connecticu­t residents. Time and again, they have both publicly voiced support for moving the state toward increased use of renewable energy, and away from a dependence on natural gas.

Their forward-thinking, science-based statements momentaril­y fill advocates with hope that Connecticu­t officials will in fact demonstrat­e bold leadership on climate by stopping the planned fracked-gas power plant in Killingly.

Then we read about the decision by DEEP to tentativel­y approve a wastewater discharge permit for the project, and our bewilderme­nt returns.

Their inconsiste­ncies are not only frustratin­g, but they pose real threats to our environmen­t and to public health. Allowing wastewater discharge into public waters would jeopardize water quality. Further, the wastewater treatment costs would fall to residents, since NTE Connecticu­t would be using the town’s publicly owned treatment plant, which has recently been upgraded at a large expense to ratepayers.

Natural gas infrastruc­ture also poses grave risks to health and safety. Gas power plants release nitrogen oxides into the air, which are known to lead to respirator­y health ailments.

Additional­ly, natural gas use involves the potential for gas leaks, which then release methane into the air and soil. The science is clear that methane is a powerful greenhouse gas that is a significan­t contributo­r to climate change.

The global pandemic has led to an economic crisis, leaving over 700,000 Connecticu­t workers unemployed or underemplo­yed.

As other advocates have suggested, Connecticu­t could address this crisis while also addressing the climate crisis by initiating a green jobs program that would put people back to work while also making progress on our time-sensitive climate goals. Building infrastruc­ture — not fossil fuel infrastruc­ture, but rather infrastruc­ture that would lead to grid modernizat­ion and increase our ability to rely on renewable energy — is an important component of achieving these goals.

The decision to approve or deny permits to expand fossil fuel infrastruc­ture is a moral one.

If state leaders allow for the building of new fossil fuel infrastruc­ture despite the risks to ecological and human health, then the message is that they value the convenienc­e of gas more than the well-being of those who will be the most impacted by its furtheranc­e. Acting in the interest of the common good requires us to make decisions that look past short-term gains for some in favor of long-term gains for most.

We must also consider the environmen­tal burdens that currently exist on the backs of front-line communitie­s. The town of Killingly is already home to a gas power plant, plaguing residents with pollution.

Due to recently constructe­d power plants in Bridgeport and Oxford, residents have to breathe dirty air and worry about their children’s health. Communitie­s of color and low-income communitie­s have disproport­ionately felt the burdens of environmen­tal degradatio­n and disregard for their basic human rights.

To further compound our bewilderme­nt, the energy that would come from the proposed Killingly power plant is not actually necessary in order to meet Connecticu­t’s energy needs. To place further burdens onto an already burdened community in order to meet a nonexisten­t need is not only illogical but also immoral.

The governors and state environmen­tal protection agencies of New York and New Jersey are using their authority to deny permits for projects that would have detrimenta­l impacts on the safety, health and well-being of their residents. Connecticu­t state leaders could, and should, do the same.

On Oct. 1, the public will have the opportunit­y to weigh in on the wastewater discharge permit during a virtual public hearing. For the sake of our collective health, we hope you will join advocates in calling on Gov. Lamont and Commission­er Dykes to deny the permit and stop this power plant.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States