Hartford Courant

Meat-free school meals spark furor in France

- By John Leicester

LE PECQ, France — By taking meat off the menu at school canteens, the ecologist mayor of one of France’s most famously gastronomi­c cities has kicked up a storm of protest and debate as the country increasing­ly questions the environmen­tal costs of its meaty dietary habits.

Children in Lyon who were regularly offered such choices as beef and chicken in rich sauces found their meat option missing this week when they returned from school holidays. In its place: a meatless four-course meal that Lyon City Hall says will be quicker and easier to serve to children who, because of the coronaviru­s pandemic, must be kept apart during lunch to avoid infections.

City Hall insists that the meatless meals are temporary and that school canteens will again offer meat options when social distancing rules are relaxed and children again have more time to dwell on their food choices and to eat.

The meat-free menus still contain animal proteins. This week’s planned main courses include fish on Monday and Friday and eggs — either as omelets or hard boiled with a creamy sauce — on other days. Children also get salad starters, a milk product — often cheese or yogurt — and dessert.

Still, farmers saw red. Some drove farm vehicles, cows and goats in protest Monday into Lyon, which is fiercely proud of its rich restaurant culture and signature dishes, many of them meaty.

Protesters’ banners and placards extolled meat-eating, proclaimin­g “meat from our fields (equals) a healthy child” and “Stopping meat is a guarantee of weakness against coronaviru­ses to come.”

The government’s agricultur­e minister, Julien Denormandi­e, also weighed in, accusing Lyon City Hall of “putting ideology in our children’s plates.” He and other critics argued the measure would penalize children from poorer families who might not be able to eat meat outside of school.

“From a nutritiona­l point of view, it is absurd to stop serving meat,” the minister said Tuesday on RTL radio. “From a social point of view, it is shameful.”

WASHINGTON — The Senate confirmed President Joe Biden’s choice to lead U.S. diplomacy at the United Nations on Tuesday. Linda Thomas-Greenfield’s confirmati­on reflected the Biden administra­tion’s determinat­ion to reengage with the world body and former President Donald Trump’s diplomacy that often left the U.S. isolated internatio­nally.

Senators voted 78-20 to confirm Thomas-Greenfield to the post, which will be a Cabinet-level position.

Also Tuesday, the Senate voted 92-7 to confirm Tom Vilsack as agricultur­e secretary, his second run at the Cabinet post. The former Iowa governor spent eight years leading the department for former President Barack Obama’s administra­tion.

In his testimony, Vilsack endorsed boosting climatefri­endly agricultur­al industries such as the creation of biofuels, saying, “Agricultur­e is one of our first and best ways to get some wins (on climate change).”

With systemic racial inequity now a nationwide talking point, Vilsack also envisioned creating an “equity taskforce” inside the department. Its job, he said, would be to identify what he called “intentiona­l or unintentio­nal barriers” that prevent or discourage farmers of color from properly accessing federal assistance programs.

Thomas-Greenfield, a retired 35-year veteran of the foreign service who resigned during the Trump administra­tion, will be the third African American, and the second Black woman, to hold the job. Her confirmati­on was hailed by Democrats and advocates of the United Nations, who had lamented the Trump administra­tion’s unilateral

approach to internatio­nal affairs.

“This confirmati­on sends a message that the United States is back and that our foreign service is back,” said Rep. Karen Bass, D-Calif., whochairs a House Foreign Affairs subcommitt­ee on Africa, global health and global human rights. “We as a country and as a world are safer with Linda Thomas-Greenfield serving as the United States ambassador to the United Nations.”

Republi c a n s who opposed her said she was soft on China and would not stand up for U.S. principles at the United Nations.

Thomas-Greenfield had rejected those concerns during her confirmati­on hearing, telling senators that a 2019 speech she gave to the Chinesefun­ded Confucius Institute had been a mistake and was not intended to be an endorsemen­t of Chinese government policies. In the speech, she had praised China’s $1 trillion Belt and Road global infrastruc­ture program in Africa and called for “a win-win-win situation” where the U.S.

and China would promote good governance and the rule of law.

She told senators that China is a strategic adversary and that “their actions threaten our security, they threaten our values and they threaten our way of life, and they are a threat to their neighbors and they are a threat across the globe.”

She spoke of China’s diplomatic inroads during the Trump administra­tion, which pursued an “America First” policy that weakened internatio­nal alliances. She made clear there would be a change under Biden to reengage internatio­nally and promote American values.

She stressed that U.S. leadership must be rooted in the country’s values — “support for democracy, respect for universal human rights, and the promotion of peace and security.” She said effective diplomacy means developing “robust relationsh­ips,” finding common ground and managing difference­s, and “doing genuine, old-fashioned, people-to-people diplomacy.”

 ?? MICHAELREY­NOLDS/EPA ?? Senators voted 78-20 to confirm Linda Thomas-Greenfield as U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Above, she testifies Jan. 27 before a Senate panel.
MICHAELREY­NOLDS/EPA Senators voted 78-20 to confirm Linda Thomas-Greenfield as U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Above, she testifies Jan. 27 before a Senate panel.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States