Hartford Courant

Tech is changing manufactur­ing, but can area businesses keep up?

- By Erica E. Phillips This story was produced as part of the Higher Education Media Fellowship. The Fellowship supports reporting on career and technical education. It is administer­ed by the Institute for Citizens & Scholars and funded by the ECMC Foundati

Manufactur­ing is merging with modern technology. Artificial intelligen­ce, cloud computing, sensors and robotics will soon become ubiquitous on many factory floors.

But within Connecticu­t’s vaunted advanced manufactur­ing sector — which for decades has churned out jet engines, precision aircraft components, medical devices and semiconduc­tor parts — adjusting to this “Fourth Industrial Revolution” is overextend­ing small- and medium-sized businesses. It’s also creating growing needs for hightech training and postsecond­ary certificat­ions and degree programs at colleges and universiti­es around the state.

Without a coordinate­d approach between business and higher education, state and industry leaders say, Connecticu­t’s advanced manufactur­ing sector could lose out to competitor­s.

“The supply chain will not be teed up to meet the demands of this intense defense manufactur­ing in the state,” Sen. Joan Hartley, D-waterbury, who co-chairs the General Assembly’s Commerce Committee, said. “And if we’ve got a pause in keeping that engine fueled, things are moving so fast, everybody around us is going to eat our lunch.”

These new advancemen­ts in manufactur­ing technology come as pockets of industrial production are reappearin­g in the United States after the decadeslon­g trend of corporate outsourcin­g to lower-cost countries. Recent developmen­ts, like pandemic-induced supply chain interrupti­ons and new federal subsidies for high-tech manufactur­ing, have provided incentives for companies to “reshore” their engineerin­g and factory operations back to the Americas.

That, in turn, has driven urgent demand in several regions of the country for new, more productive industrial technologi­es — and the workforce that can design, build and maintain it.

“What you’re seeing is a big push for advanced manufactur­ing resiliency in the U.S., almost a reindustri­alization,” said Alexander Kersten, an analyst with the Center for Strategic and Internatio­nal Studies.

As a result, Connecticu­t, with its reputation as an advanced-manufactur­ing juggernaut, has been facing a lot of fresh competitio­n.

Two years ago, Connecticu­t lawmakers passed legislatio­n establishi­ng a working group tasked with helping manufactur­ers transition to “Industry 4.0,” as it’s known. In late 2022 the group published a report that lists publicly funded programs available to companies across the state — including technology research, training and deployment assistance — and describes how to access them. The providers include universiti­es, industry groups and consultanc­ies like Connstep and Connecticu­t Center for Advanced Technology.

“Think about it like 9-1-1 for manufactur­ing,” said Hisham Alnajjar, dean of the College of Engineerin­g, Technology, and Architectu­re at the University of Hartford, who served as a member of the Commerce Committee’s Manufactur­ing Technology Working Group.

Many smaller companies might want to automate their operations, but they don’t have capital to invest, and they don’t understand the technology enough to know where to start, Alnajjar said.

“If they want to move, and when they move, we need to have the support for them,” he said.

At Central Connecticu­t State University, for example, companies can use laboratory space, try out applicatio­ns like augmented reality or work with students and faculty to explore new technologi­es and design production processes using the university’s expertise and equipment. University President Zulma Toro, an engineer by training, said that could take the form of a student apprentice­ship, supervised by a professor, or an applied research initiative led by a faculty member.

“As we transition and more technology becomes available, and more knowledge, we’re leaving behind more and more small and medium companies,” Toro said. “I see us as that facilitato­r, to help them get to where they need in terms of readiness.”

Several collaborat­ive programs are already underway on college and corporate campuses around the state.

The University of Hartford’s College of Engineerin­g, Technology, and Architectu­re has advisory boards of industry leaders that meet several times a year with faculty. They evaluate the curriculum and offer suggestion­s for which technologi­es or software to add or remove, based on what they’re using in their operations.

The private university was able to take advantage of that insight in designing and building its new 60,000-square-foot academic facility, Hursey Center, which includes laboratori­es for everything from robotics to 3D printing, mechatroni­cs and cybersecur­ity. Business partners helped the university select equipment and design the labs.

“We really stopped the whole thing and redesigned everything” to focus on future needs of industry, Alnajjar said. “There is a train coming here called Industry 4.0. We need to make sure we are on the train.”

Jet-engine manufactur­er Pratt & Whitney establishe­d a scholarshi­p

program for engineerin­g students at the University of Connecticu­t School of Engineerin­g, which launched last year. The selected students also work for Pratt in the summer as interns and complete a design project their senior year for the company.

Goodwin University in East Hartford offers certificat­e programs in mechatroni­cs and robotics and automation. It also operates a mobile lab — a 44-foot trailer that’s literally a classroom on wheels — for companies that want their employees to learn additional skills without having to send them off site.

And at Tunxis Community College in Farmington, the Regional Center for Next Generation Manufactur­ing — funded by the National Science Foundation — is developing curriculum for people entering the field and training instructor­s in teaching advanced technologi­es.

The programs are gaining traction, but Mark Burzynski, who does recruiting and talent developmen­t for Bristol-based manufactur­er The Arthur G. Russell Co., says he’s still concerned about the industry’s workforce pipeline.

AGR builds high-volume production assembly systems that use automation, smart sensors and other very new technologi­es. The company struggles to find people

with the skills to build and maintain those systems, and its customers and competitor­s face the same challenges. Burzynski has urged state leaders to expand training and education, pushing specifical­ly for a program created by Toyota known as FAME, an abbreviati­on for Federation for Advanced Manufactur­ing Education.

But he also has a longer-term solution in mind.

On a mezzanine floor at AGR’S plant, the company has set aside space for a group of high school students to design and build robots, which they enter each year in an internatio­nal competitio­n known as FIRST Robotics. The company provides used equipment and computers, and employees offer help and feedback each afternoon when the kids show up after school.

“It’s a long-term strategy, but it has come full-circle,” Burzynski said. One of the team’s founding members now works as a design engineer at AGR.

 ?? COURTESY ?? At Tunxis Community College in Farmington, the Regional Center for Next Generation Manufactur­ing is developing curriculum for people entering the field and training instructor­s in teaching advanced technologi­es.
COURTESY At Tunxis Community College in Farmington, the Regional Center for Next Generation Manufactur­ing is developing curriculum for people entering the field and training instructor­s in teaching advanced technologi­es.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States