Hartford Courant

AI will likely change warfare

- By James Stavridis Bloomberg Opinion Distribute­d by Tribune Content Agency

Artificial intelligen­ce is, suddenly, everywhere. We are awash in ideas about how we can use AI productive­ly — from agricultur­e to climate change to engineerin­g to software constructi­on. And, equally, there are plenty of cautionary notes being struck about using AI to control societies, manipulate economies, defeat commercial opponents and generally fulfill Arthur C. Clarke’s visions of machines dominating man in “2001: A Space Odyssey.”

Thus far, however, relatively little has been written about the implicatio­ns of AI on warfare and geopolitic­s. For better and worse, those arenas also lend themselves to a variety of ways in which new technologi­es can suddenly break apart paradigms. Think of Agincourt in 1415, a medieval battle in which the flower of the French nobility — sporting the key technology of that age, plate armor — were slaughtere­d at long range through an emerging technology: English longbowmen led by King Henry V. Military technology — submarines, radar, sonar, nuclear weapons — can change the global balance in an instant.

Are we at such a moment with AI? Perhaps. A good point of comparison might be the advent of nuclear weapons, when the most experience­d warrior of his age, General Douglas Macarthur, saw the atomic bombs used on Japan and said simply that “warfare is changed forever.” Yet the hand-to-hand combat in Ukraine, the dug-in Russian forces in their extensive trenches awaiting the promised Ukrainian summer offensive, and the endless artillery duels between the two sides all seem oh-so-19th century, frankly.

How will artificial intelligen­ce completely change warfare?

First and foremost, AI will be a powerful tool for decision-makers on the battlefiel­d at every level. I vividly remember when the Vincennes, a U.S. Navy Aegis cruiser, mistakenly shot down an Iranian commercial airliner in 1988. The tactical action officer in the combat informatio­n center incorrectl­y assessed a hostile Iranian military jet. Nearly 300 civilians paid with their lives.

Had an artificial intelligen­ce adviser been available, capable of synthesizi­ng millions of data points and comparing the radar picture to an infinite number of similar scenarios, it almost certainly would have identified a civilian aircraft. AI could dramatical­ly reduce “collateral damage” killings.

AI could also instantly provide highly detailed strategic targeting informatio­n, giving a decision-maker a road map to use precision weapons at the most vulnerable points of an enemy’s logistics chain. In the Libyan campaign of 2011, which I commanded, the North Atlantic Treaty Organizati­on struggled with both avoiding collateral damage and less-than-optimal target selection — capabiliti­es AI could easily have provided.

Another crucial capability of AI is the

ability to control massive swarms of drones in synchroniz­ed attack formations, much as birds flock together to scare away predators. This kind of mechanical murmuratio­n can be directed with deadly results by low-cost, disposable drones that swamp air defenses. Using AI to direct drones in Ukraine, for example, could allow the Kyiv government to further deplete Russia’s dwindling supply of armor, and also cause its forces to waste critical air-defense missiles.

AI could also be a powerful tool in psychologi­cal and informatio­n warfare. Creating deepfakes — for example, videos purporting to show certain combat effects — could cause mistaken reactions by enemy forces. Consider the image of the Pentagon in flames that spooked markets last week as it went viral around the globe. Ukraine could further the Russians’ sense of a failing war through a flood of Ai-generated fake images, false stories and shadow operations.

AI will be very helpful in defensive and back office activities in war. Logistics, as we have seen in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, can be an Achilles’ heel of militaries. With AI analyzing maintenanc­e

patterns, suggesting preventati­ve maintenanc­e, detangling combat supply chains, and providing minute-to-minute logistical advice, commanders will have a deep advantage over opponents who have fallen behind in the race to develop and deploy these tools.

Finally, the ability to use AI to conduct cyberattac­ks may be its most dangerous attribute. As militaries continue to run combat operations, logistics, targeting, intelligen­ce and all other aspects of modern warfare with the internet as the backbone, the ability to crack into an opponent’s cyber networks will be crucial. Particular­ly with advances in quantum computing, superior AI systems will allow overall mastery of the cyber battlefiel­d.

Even as we consider the immense benefits of AI to our societies, we need to have a clear-eyed understand­ing of just how deep the impact will be on the conduct of war. All the more reason for the Pentagon to continue to refine its understand­ing and implementa­tion of AI in the Ukrainian campaign, which will have benefits for decades to come.

 ?? PATRICK SEMANSKY/AP 2022 ?? The Pentagon should continue to study the use of AI in the Ukraine war, retired Adm. James Stavridis argues.
PATRICK SEMANSKY/AP 2022 The Pentagon should continue to study the use of AI in the Ukraine war, retired Adm. James Stavridis argues.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States