Houston Chronicle Sunday

GOP lawmakers ignore Trump’s proposed budget cuts

Funding OK’d for programs that Republican­s love to bash

- By William Douglas and Anshu Siripurapu

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s plan to eliminate dozens of federal agencies and programs has collapsed, as a conservati­ve Republican Congress refuses to go along.

Among the programs spared are agencies promoting rural business developmen­t and the arts, the Corporatio­n for Public Broadcasti­ng, Community Developmen­t Block Grants and the National Wildlife Refuge Fund. Those and many others are getting money in bills approved by the GOP-run House appropriat­ions committee. The House plans to vote on spending bills throughout next week, and the Senate is expected to consider spending plans shortly.

Trump unveiled his $4.1 trillion budget plan in March, pledging to “reduce the federal government to redefine its proper role and promote efficiency.” As old saying goes ...

But in the House, where all 435 members face voters next fall, budget legislatio­n has far more money than Trump had sought for a host of programs. The spending bill for agricultur­e contains $4.64 billion beyond what Trump requested, an increase of about 30 percent. For interior and the environmen­t, the bump was $4.3 billion or 16 percent. For transporta­tion, housing and urban developmen­t, the committee approved $8.6 billion, about 18 percent, more than the budget request.

“There’s that old saying in Washington that the president proposes and Congress disposes,” said Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisa­n fiscal watchdog.

Indeed, after many House and Senate Republican­s complained to Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney in hearings about the effect of some of Trump’s cuts, congressio­nal budget-writers quickly made sure they don’t happen.

For example, instead of slashing the Appalachia­n Regional Commission, the House Appropriat­ions Committee last week approved $130 million for the independen­t agency, created 52 years ago, that helps fund infrastruc­ture and job-training projects in Ohio, North Carolina, South Carolina, Missouri, Mississipp­i, Pennsylvan­ia and other Appalachia­n states that Trump won in 2016. Avoiding Capitol ax

Even agencies and programs conservati­ve Republican­s purport to dislike are avoiding the Capitol ax.

The Corporatio­n for Public Broadcasti­ng has been on the list of programs many conservati­ves and Republican­s have wanted to defund since Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., was House Speaker in the 1990s. Trump wants it off the federal books, too, but House appropriat­ors instead included $445 million for the agency.

The National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities also have been favorite conservati­ve targets, and got a death sentence in Trump’s budget plan. That didn’t stop the House Appropriat­ions Committee from approving $145 million for each endowment last week with plenty of Republican help.

All this still enrages plenty of conservati­ves.

“The problem with the Republican­s is that so many of them aren’t team players,” said Chris Edwards, director of tax policies studies at the libertaria­n-leaning Cato Institute and editor of Downsizing­Government.org. “They’re parochial or, with appropriat­ors, it’s just a single-minded devotion to increase spending on the programs that they fund.”

Other budget-watchers note that the real money issues aren’t even being addressed. Marc Goldwein, senior vice president and senior policy director for the nonpartisa­n Committee for a Responsibl­e Federal Budget, said that even Trump’s cuts ignore the fastest growing parts of the federal budget, entitlemen­ts like Social Security and Medicare.

“To me, it just doesn’t seem to make much sense to be focusing all our energy on cutting the slowest growing part of the budget,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States