Houston Chronicle Sunday

Moore’s campaign reveals rot in the GOP’s soul

David Brooks says Republican­s have traded excellence for hucksteris­m, and their corrupt bargain will poison the party for an entire generation.

-

A lot of good, honorable Republican­s used to believe there was a safe middle ground. You didn’t have to tie yourself hip to hip with Donald Trump, but you didn’t have to go all the way to the other extreme and commit political suicide like the dissident Jeff Flake, either. You could sort of float along in the middle, and keep your head down until this whole Trump thing passed.

Now it’s clear that middle ground doesn’t exist. That’s because Donald Trump never stops asking. First, he asked the party to swallow the idea of a narcissist­ic sexual harasser and a routine liar as its party leader. Then he asked the party to accept his comprehens­ive ignorance and his politics of racial division. Now he asks the party to give up its reputation for fiscal conservati­sm. At the same time he asks the party to become the party of Roy Moore, the party of bigotry, alleged sexual harassment and child assault.

There is no end to what Trump will ask of his party. He is defined by shamelessn­ess, and so there is no bottom. And apparently there is no end to what regular Republican­s are willing to give him. Trump may soon ask them to accept his firing of Robert Mueller, and yes, after some sighing, they will accept that, too.

That’s the way these corrupt bargains always work. You think you’re only giving your tormentor a little piece of yourself, but he keeps asking and asking, and before long he owns your entire soul.

The Republican Party is doing harm to every cause it purports to serve. If Republican­s accept Roy Moore as a U.S. senator, they may, for a couple years, have one more vote for a justice or a tax cut, but they will have made their party loathsome for an entire generation. The pro-life cause will be forever associated with moral hypocrisy on an epic scale. The word “evangelica­l” is already being discredite­d for an entire generation. Young people and people of color look at the Trump-Moore GOP and they are repulsed, maybe forever.

You don’t help your cause by wrapping your arms around an alleged sexual predator and a patriarchi­c bigot. You don’t help your cause by putting the pursuit of power above character, by worshippin­g at the feet of some loutish man or another, by claiming the ends justify any means. You don’t successful­ly rationaliz­e your own tawdriness by claiming your opponents are satanic. You don’t save Christiani­ty by betraying its message.

“What shall it profit a man,” Jesus asked, “if he gain the whole world and suffer the loss of his own soul?” The current Republican Party seems to not understand that question. Donald Trump seems to have made gaining the world at the cost of his soul his entire life’s motto.

It’s amazing that there haven’t been more Republican­s like Mitt Romney who have said: “Enough is enough! I can go no further!”

The reason, I guess, is that the rot that has brought us to the brink of Sen. Roy Moore began long ago. Starting with Sarah Palin and the spread of Fox News, the GOP traded an ethos of excellence for an ethos of hucksteris­m.

The Republican Party I grew up with admired excellence. It admired intellectu­al excellence (Milton Friedman, William F. Buckley), moral excellence ( John Paul II, Natan Sharansky) and excellent leaders ( James Baker, Jeane Kirkpatric­k). Populism abandoned all that — and had to by its very nature. Excellence is hierarchic­al. Excellence requires work, time, experience and talent. Populism doesn’t believe in hierarchy. Populism doesn’t demand the effort required to understand the best that has been thought and said. Populism celebrates the quick slogan, the impulsive slash, the easy ignorant assertion. Populism is blind to mastery and embraces mediocrity.

Compare the tax cuts of the supply-side era with the tax cuts of today. There were three big cuts in the earlier era: the 1978 capital gains tax cut, the Kemp-Roth tax cut of 1981, and the 1986 tax reform. They were passed with bipartisan support, after a lengthy legislativ­e process. All of them responded to the dominant problem of the moment, which was the stagflatio­n and economic sclerosis. All rested on a body of serious intellectu­al work.

Liberals now associate supply-side economics with the Laffer Curve, but that was peripheral. Supply-side was based on Say’s Law, that supply creates its own demand. It was based on the idea that if you rearrange incentives for small entreprene­urs you are more likely to get startups and more innovation. Those cuts were embraced by Nobel Prize winners and represente­d an entire social vision, favoring the dispersed entreprene­urs over the concentrat­ed corporate fat cats.

Today’s tax cuts have no bipartisan support. They have no intellectu­al grounding, no body of supporting evidence. They do not respond to the central crisis of our time. They have no vision of the common good, except that Republican donors should get more money and Democratic donors should have less.

The rot afflicting the GOP is comprehens­ive — moral, intellectu­al, political and reputation­al. More and more former Republican­s wake up every day and realize: “I’m homeless. I’m politicall­y homeless.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States