Houston Chronicle Sunday

Are Social Security, Medicare concerns?

- By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar

WASHINGTON — An unexpected weakening in the finances of Social Security and Medicare has raised concerns about the bedrock programs for the middle class. The problems might only keep getting worse in a time of political tension and deep partisan divisions.

Here are some questions and answers on an issue that ultimately will affect every American family and isn’t going away:

What’s new?

The government’s annual Trustees Reports on the programs show the financial condition of both worsening significan­tly since last year. The projected insolvency for Social Security stayed unchanged — in 2034 — but Medicare’s moved three years closer, to 2026.

A more immediate warning signal caught the eye of experts.

Both programs will start tapping their reserves this year, meaning that income from payroll taxes and interest earned by the Social Security and Medicare trust funds will no longer cover costs. That threshold was a few years away in the 2017 checkup.

“The near-term outlook in both programs got substantia­lly worse,” said Republican economist Charles Blahous, a former public trustee helping to oversee program finances. “What is unusual in the space of one year is to go from something that isn’t supposed to happen for four or five years to something that’s happening right now.”

What’s wrong with waiting?

“A lot of people in Congress are focused on what’s going to happen tomorrow, not what’s going to happen in 2026,” said Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J.

But waiting in the context of Social Security and Medicare inflicts more pain, leading to bigger tax increases, benefit cuts as high as 20 percent, or some combinatio­n of both, as the programs slide deeper into the hole.

Younger people, less likely to be following the debate, have the most to lose.

“People under 50 are paying into a system that can’t afford to pay them the benefit it’s promising them, and I don’t think they realize it,” said Robert Bixby of the Concord Coalition, a nonpartisa­n group that advocates better control of federal budgeting. “The more we delay reforms, the more sudden and draconian they would be, especially for younger people.”

What are some policy options?

Options for Social Security include lifting the limit on which payroll taxes are levied (now $128,400), reducing annual cost-of-living increases, raising the underlying payroll tax rate, changing the benefit formula, and raising the full retirement age (now gradually rising to 67).

Options for Medicare include raising the eligibilit­y age — now 65 — to match Social Security’s, cutting payments to medical service providers, raising premiums for beneficiar­ies, and raising the payroll tax.

Where do Trump and lawmakers stand?

President Donald Trump promised not to cut Social Security or Medicare, and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin suggested that tax cuts, rolling back regulation­s, and better trade agreements could boost economic growth and help stabilize the programs. But nonpartisa­n government experts who produced the annual Social Security assessment don’t seem to buy that, forecastin­g “sustained moderate economic growth.”

Republican­s in Congress are losing their most prominent advocate for overhaulin­g benefit programs with the retirement of House Speaker Paul Ryan of Wisconsin. Their budget credibilit­y is seen as damaged after passing major tax cuts and spending increases.

Democrats want to expand social programs, not pare them.

Problem-solving is becoming a lost skill in Washington, GOP economist Douglas Holtz-Eakin said.

“There used to be a playbook where the White House provided leadership and gave air cover to Congress to do hard things, so members could go home and defend their votes,” Holtz-Eakin sasid. “Maybe such a strategy is being hatched behind closed doors at the White House, (but) to date, there is no evidence.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States