Religious freedom trackers chafe at congressional proposal
The federal commission that tracks global religious freedom is facing a rift with Capitol Hill over a proposal that some members warn would hurt its effectiveness.
At issue is bipartisan legislation introduced two months ago to reauthorize the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom for four years. The bill also would ask the commission to review “the abuse of religion to justify human rights violations” — a responsibility not defined in more detail — and restrict commissioners from using their federal title when they speak as private citizens. Additionally, commissioners would have to report to Congress on international travel paid for by sources outside their families or the government.
In a capital often dominated by partisan polarization, those proposed changes created a rare division: senators in both parties seeking increased oversight, and commissioners in both parties balking.
The bipartisan commission, established in 1998 by Congress, has used its megaphone to amplify hot-button religious freedom issues worldwide, ranging from the detainment of an American pastor in Turkey to inflammatory content in Saudi textbooks. But the presence of three prominent conservative evangelicals on the commission at a time when President Donald Trump is elevating religious freedom is sparking debate about whether it can stay above the political fray.
The tension seeped into public view earlier this month when one GOPappointed commissioner, Kristina Arriaga, resigned from her post with a warning against the legislation released by GOP and Democratic senators.
Arriaga opposes the proposed oversight requirements for commissioners, writing to the Associated Press that the bill would turn a unified commission into a “useless bureaucracy.” But she also sees problems in Congress asking the commission to vet human rights infringement, predicting that it could mire their portfolio in same-sex marriage, circumcision and other politically volatile religious topics.
“Expanding the mission to include the possibility of discussing religious practices as human rights violations sounds innocuous,” Arriaga said in an interview, “but it opens up a whole theological discussion about what happens inside of religions.”
A leading Republican working on a bipartisan agreement to reauthorize the commission, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, tweeted in response to a Wall
Street Journal op-ed Arriaga published that the proposed changes she decried were part of the process of legislative compromise.
In fact, some of the changes Arriaga opposes were aimed at ensuring commissioners — unpaid volunteers — don’t misrepresent the religious freedom body while speaking as private individuals. One commissioner, Trump evangelical adviser Johnnie Moore, has met twice in the past year with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, whose kingdom’s longstanding restraint of religious freedom has drawn criticism from the commission.
The Senate proposal “may have been well intended, but it will have unintended consequences,” said Moore, adding he personally pays for international travel he takes to advocate for global religious freedom and interfaith collaboration.
Concerns among some religious freedom commissioners are not limited to its conservatives, who include two other Trump evangelical advisers: Tony Perkins, president of the right-leaning Family Research Council, and Gary Bauer, president of the right-leaning group American Values.
Gayle Manchin, a Democratic-appointed commissioner and wife of West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, said that though religious freedom and other issues often overlap, members “did not want our mission to be watered down or filtered out in a lot of different directions.”
Perkins tweeted Friday that he was “surprised” by Arriaga’s departure even as he echoed her worries about the Senate bill.
“We will continue to work to ensure (the commission) will not be put on a short leash, but remain a watchdog for religious freedom,” Perkins wrote.