Texas-size power — in Sweden
Swedish remote onshore wind farm will rival the Lone Star State for size, generation.
In a remote area almost eight times the size of Manhattan covered by millions of young fir trees, Europe’s biggest onshore wind park is emerging.
Workers are installing turbines perched atop 130-meter tall towers at a rate of about two a week at the site in northern Sweden, where the temperature regularly dips below minus 14 Fahrenheit and the sun is hardly seen for months on end during winter. So far, more than 170 of the machines scatter across the sparse land owned by some of the nation’s biggest forest companies.
Markbygden, as the site is called, may be the clearest sign yet of the industry’s seismic shift away from subsidies and toward relying on markets that also set returns for traditional plants running on natural gas, coal or nuclear energy. It’s also a harbinger for the giant facilities that will be needed for nations to meet the climate targets they’re discussing at the United Nations’s upcoming COP25 conference in Madrid.
The wind farm has drawn investors from a wide spectrum of energy and high finance. Firms including General Electric Co. and Macquarie Group Ltd. will spend as much as $7 billion on the facility. It will be vital to Sweden’s power supply as two old reactors are due to shut permanently next year, as well as for power exports to the continent. Some of the electricity will also be sold to customers including aluminum producer Norsk Hydro ASA under a deal that was the biggest of its kind at the time when signed two years ago.
The expansion of wind power sweeping northern Sweden has been likened to the Texan wind boom of the past few decades, which turned the state into the biggest producer in the U.S. The high plains may look very different from the Swedish forests, but they both provide vast expanses of land with favorable breezes steady enough to spin turbines.
“When it comes to wind power, Sweden has more in common with Texas than the rest of Europe,” Roland Flaig, head of RWE AG’s renewable energy arm in Sweden, said in an interview. “Few and big land owners makes it possible to build larger parks.”
When the facility is completed in the next decade, it will be connected by a network of graveled roads stretching longer than from London to Paris. Two power lines on pylons cut through the flat landscape where the turbines are the only other landmarks.
Developed by closely held Svevind AB, the Markbygden facility sprawls across 111,000 acres. It had six people when construction began in 2012. At its busiest, 600 to 700 people work on the site. The area is still used for hunting and snowmobile excursions by locals.
But the nation’s boom is more than Markbygden. Several
other big projects by developers, including OX2 AB and Arise AB, are under way, and wind power output in the Nordic region’s largest economy is expected to double in the next three years. Companies say they prefer Sweden over Germany for example, citing the relative ease of getting permissions for big parks.
When the park is completed, it will generate almost as much power as the two reactors at Vattenfall AB’s nuclear plant in southern Sweden that will shut by the end of next year. That will help maintain a national surplus and push exports through new cables to markets from Germany to the U.K., where onshore installations have plunged.
New capacity in Germany, Europe’s biggest renewables market, slumped to 0.3 gigawatts in the first half, compared with 2.4 gigawatts in 2018. Still, onshore wind met as much as 17 percent of the nation’s power last year.
For Sweden to meet a political goal of generating all power from renewables by 2040, installed onshore capacity would need to almost triple in the next 20 years, according to RWE. That would exceed today’s capacity in Texas.
While the offshore industry is getting a lot of hype because of its bigger towers and blades, BloombergNEF estimates that there’s not a single year until at least 2050 when there will be more new capacity at sea than on land in Europe.