Houston Chronicle Sunday

Oil lobby spreads disinforma­tion on climate change

- CHRIS TOMLINSON

Oil and gas lobbyists are finally feeling the heat on climate change, but sadly, they remain committed to misleading the American people.

The American Petroleum Institute, the premier industry organizati­on that establishe­s standards and engages politician­s, is out with a nationwide advertisin­g campaign. Oil and gas companies, the group would have you believe, have been fighting climate change and possess the solution.

“Our paths are not all the same, we have different perspectiv­es on the best way forward,” a new television ad says. “But on issues that matter, like climate change, we’re more alike than we think. We want cleaner solutions, and that means working with each other.”

“So, the innovators in America’s natural gas and oil companies have teamed up with the country’s brightest minds and

reduced carbon emission levels to the lowest in a generation,” the narrator continues, as happy, well-dressed millennial­s file past. “Let’s make tomorrow better, together.”

Rarely has a copywriter packed so much poppycock into 30 seconds. Let’s break it down.

“Our paths are not all the same; we have different perspectiv­es on the best way forward.” True, because the bottom line is we must ban greenhouse gas emissions, something API adamantly opposes.

“But on issues that matter, like climate change, we’re more alike than we think. We want cleaner solutions, and that means working with each other.” Hogwash.

For over 50 years, API and its members have disputed climate change and fossil fuels’ role in warming the planet. The most duplicitou­s move came in 1998 when the API drafted the “Global Climate Science Communicat­ions Plan.” The goal was to derail the United Nations’ Kyoto Protocol to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

API launched a similar campaign that exaggerate­d “uncertaint­ies” in climate science. API lobbyists then used their influence to kill proposed regulation­s and turn climate science into a partisan issue where Republican­s feel obliged to ignore science.

The API communicat­ions team secretly recruited five scientists to stir debate, while hiding the industry’s financial backing for their research, according to internal API documents made public in 2015.

“These will be individual­s who do not have a long history of visibility and/or participat­ion in the climate change debate,” the API memo said. “Rather, this team will consist of new faces who will add their voices to those recognized scientists who are already vocal.”

One of those scientists was Wei-Hock Soon, who from 2003-2012 incorrectl­y declared that solar flares play a significan­t role in global warming. The scientific community has since discredite­d his work.

API also produced teaching materials questionin­g climate change for the National Science Teachers Associatio­n. The API said it hoped “to erect a barrier against further efforts to impose Kyoto-like measures in the future.” That continued through 2015.

In 2011, API fought the EPA’s decision to regulate carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act as well as proposed limits on methane, one of the worst greenhouse gases. In May 2017, senior API lobbyist Howard Feldman urged EPA Administra­tor Scott Pruitt to relax methane limits, and last year the group celebrated victory.

When it comes to climate change and addressing greenhouse gas emissions, no API, we are not “more alike than we think.” The day API acknowledg­es its past behavior and embraces a ban on all methane and carbon emissions, then we might be alike.

Lastly, the ad’s final line implies that a happy accident was intentiona­l: “The innovators in America’s natural gas and oil companies have teamed up with the country’s brightest minds and reduced carbon emission levels to the lowest in a generation.”

The developers of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing were innovators who forever changed the world. But they were not fighting climate change.

Oil and gas companies experiment­ed with fracking because natural gas was $13 for a million BTUs. Fracking has since brought the price down to $2, which is why electricit­y companies shut down dirty coal plants and replaced them with natural gas, reducing carbon emissions.

The reduced emissions were coincident­al since most of the industry rejected climate change while developing the technology.

Today, wind and solar energy costs are dropping so low they compete with natural gas, and Democrats want to phase out fossil fuels.

Young people detest the oil and gas industry. These are the reasons for API’s “natural gas and oil” campaign, with the emphasis on natural.

API strategist­s know climate change denial no longer works, so they are rebranding their polluting industry as clean energy. For the first time in 150 years, the industry is worried about its future.

Not to worry too much, the world will always need oil and gas, we just need to combust less of them.

But what we don’t need is API’s cynical disinforma­tion campaign; we’ve had plenty of that already.

 ??  ??
 ?? Jonah M. Kessel / New York Times ?? An infrared image of emissions leaks at DCP Pegasus gas processing plant, one of many of installati­ons in the Permian Basin.
Jonah M. Kessel / New York Times An infrared image of emissions leaks at DCP Pegasus gas processing plant, one of many of installati­ons in the Permian Basin.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States