Houston Chronicle Sunday

Black doctors want to examine federal review of vaccines

- By Meryl Kornfield

When Black physician Tina Carroll-Scott started working at South Miami Children’s Clinic, she said none of her Black patients would consider getting a flu shot.

A complicate­d history with forced vaccinatio­ns and experiment­s had undercut trust of medical procedures and immunizati­on within Black communitie­s. For more than a decade, Carroll-Scott, the clinic’s medical director, toiled to build a relationsh­ip with those in the diverse South Florida neighborho­od, where the majority of residents are Hispanic and nearly 14 percent Black and African American, according to census data.

“After being at the clinic for 13 years and educating patients about the flu vaccine and dispelling any myths they had about it,” Carroll-Scott said, “I’ve now gotten my patients to a point where they talk to me, and they’re willing to take it.”

But now, as the Food and Drug Administra­tion and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention repeatedly assure the public that the vaccine for the coronaviru­s will be safe, indication­s that the review process may be undercut by politics has turned off people in minority communitie­s to getting the vaccine when it becomes available — worrying physicians that communitie­s disproport­ionately devastated by the COVID-19 pandemic are most at risk of being left out of immunizati­on efforts.

To soothe fears within minority communitie­s, a panel of Black doctors will vet the federal review of companies’ vaccines, said Leon McDougle, president of the National Medical Associatio­n, the largest and oldest group of Black physicians in the country.

“We have concerns,” McDougle told MSNBC on Thursday about the vaccine’s review process. “There’s been a cloud of political influence dating back to hydroxychl­oroquine … following that, convalesce­nt plasma,” he said, referring to the various treatment options promoted by President Donald Trump and other government officials. “We want to be that nonpartisa­n, independen­t voice, speaking to the African American community and our physicians of the National Medical Associatio­n.”

When asked what would happen if the panel does not approve a vaccine vetted by the FDA, McDougle said Black doctors are trusted within their communitie­s and that if they don’t believe in the safety and efficacy of the vaccine, “it’s not going to move forward.”

Checks by outsiders

McDougle told NPR that he spoke to members of Operation Warp Speed, the project working on a vaccine for the virus, to make the trial data on it publicly available.

The FDA referred the Washington Post to its past statements about the review process when asked about the panel, including testimony by Commission­er Stephen Hahn on Wednesday that its investigat­ions into coronaviru­s vaccine candidates would be thorough.

“I want to assure you and emphasize every one of the decisions we have reached has been made by career FDA scientists based on science and data, not politics,” Hahn said. Hours later, Trump hinted in his news briefing that he may not sign off on stricter review guidelines recommende­d by the FDA, calling the change “a political move more than anything else.”

The National Medical Associatio­n is not the only group vetting the oversight of vaccines, as New York also will conduct a review, Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced Thursday.

Additional checks by outside organizati­ons can further the scientific process, according to Richard Baron, the president and CEO of the American Board of Internal Medicine, which is based in Philadelph­ia. Baron said any disagreeme­nts between the NMA and New York on the one side and the FDA and CDC on the other should raise concerns about the federal agencies.

“I would not lay the blame at the feet of the organizati­ons that are trying to maintain a scientific approach,” he said. “I would lay it down at the feet of the federal organizati­ons that are chartered to oversee a scientific approach and don’t seem to be demonstrat­ing a public commitment to that.”

Polls show Americans increasing­ly have expressed concern about a vaccine that is available within the year. Three-quarters of U.S. adults surveyed by the Pew Research Center this month said it is at least somewhat likely that a coronaviru­s vaccine will be approved before it’s fully known whether it is safe and effective.

Not much trust

The trust of a first-generation COVID-19 vaccine is significan­tly less among Black Americans when compared with white or Hispanic people: Less than 30 percent of Black people said they would be willing to take the vaccine, as opposed to 51 percent of white and 56 percent of Hispanic people, an Axios-Ipsos survey last month found. The gap waned when those surveyed were asked about getting a flu shot.

Suma Vupputuri, an epidemiolo­gist and research scientist for Kaiser Permanente, who studied the rates of flu vaccinatio­n across races, said oversight over the safety of a vaccine may be a more effective way to recruit Black patients and garnering trust than a blind effort to disseminat­e a vaccine in Black communitie­s that is not safe.

“You almost go the other direction if you’re trying to push a vaccine that may not be safe at a Black community, and if something does go wrong, and there are ill effects, then all of a sudden, all those good intentions went exactly in the opposite direction,” Vupputuri said.

More Black voices are needed in science, argued Kevin Ileka in the Harvard Business Review, citing a recent racist suggestion by two French scientists that trials to determine the effectiven­ess of a tuberculos­is vaccine against the coronaviru­s should take place in Africa.

Ileka, an analytical chemist at pharmaceut­ical company Bristol Myers Squibb, compared the proposal’s apathy to Black lives to the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, where doctors beginning in the 1930s left hundreds of Black men untreated with syphilis for four decades to evaluate how the disease ravaged their bodies.

In South Miami, CarrollSco­tt informally surveyed her own patients about their likelihood of getting a coronaviru­s vaccine and found “a lot of the patients were concerned about the speed.”

“Overwhelmi­ngly the answer was no. I would say that that was the consensus,” she said.

Trump’s rhetoric calling for the speedy arrival of a vaccine has concerned patients, Carroll-Scott said, as some worry that Trump’s priority is “reelection rather than a safe and effective vaccine.”

“I think just the name, ‘Operation Warp Speed,’ invokes a lot of fear and suspicion,” Carroll-Scott said of the name given to the White House’s efforts to scale up vaccinatio­n. “The education is paramount, and, unfortunat­ely, this whole conversati­on with the vaccine and the pandemic, there’s a sense of urgency, and I feel like we are behind the eight ball in terms of educating the community.”

Carroll-Scott said she welcomes the news of the NMA panel because the oversight may help to assure those most at risk of the virus’ lifethreat­ening symptoms.

“We are the trusted messengers in these communitie­s,” she said of Black doctors. “And so if we’re questionin­g things and not fully confident in this process, there’s no way that we’re going to be able to get our patients on board.”

 ?? Blake Farmer / Nashville Public Radio / Tribune News Service ?? Dr. Vladimir Berthaud, left, and Dr. Rajbir Singh recruit patients for a COVID-19 vaccine trial at Meharry Medical College in Nashville, Tenn.
Blake Farmer / Nashville Public Radio / Tribune News Service Dr. Vladimir Berthaud, left, and Dr. Rajbir Singh recruit patients for a COVID-19 vaccine trial at Meharry Medical College in Nashville, Tenn.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States