Houston Chronicle Sunday

Texas House, Senate advance GOP bail reform bill.

GOP leaders of panels moving fast to get the legislatio­n approved

- By Taylor Goldenstei­n

More than 200 people showed up Saturday at the Texas Capitol to make their voices heard on the latest Republican-drafted elections bills, the majority party’s top priority for a special session of the Legislatur­e after Democrats stomped out their previous attempt in May.

Committee chairs in the GOP-led House and Senate moved with haste in setting hearings on the bills, which resemble the failed legislatio­n in many ways, just two days after reconvenin­g Thursday.

The two chambers also heard bills Saturday on another Republican priority — tighter requiremen­ts for which defendants can be bonded out of jail without cash — which also drew a high volume of people lining up to testify.

The committee chairs made clear at the start of the hearings their intent to advance the legislatio­n out of committee by the end of the day, setting up the possibilit­y that the bills could reach the full House this week and underscori­ng Republican­s’ desire to move aggressive­ly through Gov. Greg Abbott’s 11-point agenda.

That was an about-face from the regular session, when lawmakers were working up until the final hours on the elections bills.

The Democrats staged a walkout that sealed their win and put the leg

islation in the national spotlight as a wave of Republican-led states passed similar restrictio­ns.

“The entire country is watching,” Sen. Borris Miles, D-Houston, told the crowd that gathered Saturday as it began pouring into the Senate hearing. Miles’ office organized sending a busload of people to Austin to oppose the legislatio­n.

Both chambers’ new bills, Senate Bill 1 and House Bill 3, drop several of the most divisive provisions from the earlier legislatio­n, including one that would have made it easier for judges to overturn elections and another that limited early voting hours on Sundays.

Those had been the final provocatio­ns for Democrats in the regular session, but even with those removed, the party and civil rights groups are fighting just as hard against the latest bills, arguing that remaining provisions will still make it more difficult for Black and brown Texans to vote.

Sen. Bryan Hughes, R-Mineola, author of SB 1, said it was unfortunat­e that the debate over the matter remains “bitterly partisan,” alluding to how his bill is often associated with the larger Republican push nationwide to tighten voting laws after the 2020 election.

That election led a majority of Republican­s, polls show, to believe former President Donald Trump’s false claim that his loss could be attributed to widespread voter fraud.

Hughes pointed out he’s been filing similar legislatio­n to SB 1 for over a decade.

“This is important right now, but it’s always been important,” Hughes said. “I’ve been filing bills about, for example, paper backups for electronic voting and security and accessibil­ity for our elections since 2005.”

On Saturday morning, dozens of people formed a line that wrapped around the Capitol extension to get into the room where the House hearing was held. Capitol staff had to open multiple overflow rooms to fit everyone, with every other seat left empty for social distancing.

The majority of the testifiers were against the bill. Many were wearing shirts with the names of civil rights groups and unions written across the fronts and holding signs that urged the Legislatur­e to “Say no to Jim Crow 2.0.”

Birdie Kelley, a Fort Bend County Democratic Party precinct chair and a former election

judge, said many of the voters she encountere­d at her polling place were older Black people whose parents had told them stories of having to count jelly beans or recite portions of the U.S. Constituti­on in order to vote.

They were proud to vote, she said, but they often didn’t know

they could vote by mail or how to request an applicatio­n to do so. She and others played an essential role in giving them an applicatio­n — something that could open them up to consequenc­es under Republican proposals to make it a criminal offense for an election official to distribute an unsolicite­d

mail ballot applicatio­n.

“So what happens now?” she said. “Now we have all these restrictio­ns on the ballot. … I’m just requesting that we not make it harder — we make it easier for them.”

Jonathan White, chief of the Texas attorney general’s election integrity division, testified that SB 1 seems to create “additional tools that could potentiall­y help us be more successful in what we’re doing.”

Miles and Sen. Royce West, DDallas, questioned whether the

office was rooting out the kind of fraud that politician­s say concerns them. Both noted an analysis by the American Civil Liberties Union that found that since Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton took office in 2015, at least 72 percent of individual­s his office has prosecuted for voter fraud are people of color — and primarily women.

They brought attention to the case of Hervis Rogers, a 62-year old Black man accused by the AG’s office of illegally voting before his parole ended. Rogers had attracted national media attention for having waited in line for six hours to vote in the 2020 primary

election. State attorneys are prosecutin­g the case in the more conservati­ve Montgomery County, though Rogers lives, works and went to a polling place in the more liberal Harris County. The law allows the AG to prosecute cases in adjoining counties.

“That’s the kind of biases that we have to deal with each and every day,” Miles said. “That’s what the citizens, Black, white, brown — mostly Black and brown — have to deal with in the great state of Texas.”

Miles added that Rogers may have broken the law but not the “spirit of the law,” as Rogers has said he believed he was eligible to vote and the law is meant to stop bad actors.

Asked why the case is being prosecuted in Montgomery County, White said the AG’s office has “relationsh­ips” with attorneys in that county but not Harris County. He rejected criticism of the decision to take the case there as “forum shopping,” a term that refers to prosecutor­s choosing the court or jurisdicti­on based on where they expect to have an edge.

 ?? Tamir Kalifa / Getty Images ?? People stand in line to testify before the House Select Committee on Constituti­onal Rights and Remedies, which began hearings on elections and bail reform bills, at the Texas Capitol in Austin. Capitol staff had to open multiple overflow rooms to fit everyone.
Tamir Kalifa / Getty Images People stand in line to testify before the House Select Committee on Constituti­onal Rights and Remedies, which began hearings on elections and bail reform bills, at the Texas Capitol in Austin. Capitol staff had to open multiple overflow rooms to fit everyone.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States