Houston Chronicle Sunday

GOP senator calls election review process ‘botched’ as ballot count ends in Arizona

- By Jonathan J. Cooper

PHOENIX — Arizona Republican­s’ partisan review of the 2020 election results got off to a rocky start when their contractor­s broke rules for counting ballots and election experts warned the work was dangerous for democracy.

When the auditors stopped the counting and returned the ballots this week, it hadn’t gotten better. In the last week alone, the only audit leader with substantia­l election experience was locked out of the building, went on the radio to say he was quitting, then reversed course hours later. The review’s Twitter accounts were suspended for breaking the rules. A conservati­ve Republican senator withdrew her support, calling the process “botched.” And the lead auditor confirmed what was long suspected: that his work was almost entirely paid for by supporters of Donald Trump who were active in the former president’s movement to spread false narratives of fraud.

All this came nearly 100 days into a process that was supposed to take “about 60 days,” according to the Senate Republican­s who launched it. And it’s not over yet. Contractor­s are now producing a report on the findings that could take weeks or more to write.

The turmoil casts even more doubt on the conclusion­s of what backers describe as a “forensic audit” but what experts and critics say is a deeply flawed, partisan process.

“Not even a shred of being salvaged at this point,” said Sen. Paul Boyer, the first Republican state senator to publicly come out

against the audit in May. “They’ve botched it at so many points along the way that it’s irrecovera­ble.”

Boyer’s opposition became less lonely last weekend when another Republican, Sen. Michelle Ugenti-Rita, one of the Legislatur­e’s strongest advocates for stricter voting laws, agreed that “the Trump audit” was “botched.” Along with all 14 Democrats, a majority of the Senate, which commission­ed the audit, is now against it.

“I wanted to review our election processes and see what, if anything, could be improved,” Ugenti-Rita wrote on Twitter. “Sadly, it’s now become clear that the audit has been botched.”

The review includes a hand count of ballots, the analysis of voter data and a review of ballotcoun­ting machines. It’s being led by Cyber Ninjas, a software security consultant with no election experience before Trump began trying to overturn the 2020 results. Its owner, Doug Logan, has supported the movement to spread false conspiraci­es about the vote count in battlegrou­nd states.

On Wednesday night, Logan ended months of silence about who was paying him when he said a whopping $5.7 million had been contribute­d by political groups run by prominent Trump supporters including Michael Flynn, Sidney Powell, Patrick Byrne and correspond­ents from One America News Network. The figure dwarfs the $150,000 to be paid by the Senate.

Logan has said he was approachin­g the review objectivel­y and his own views are irrelevant. Still, Logan appeared in “The Deep Rig,” a conspirato­rial film claiming the election was stolen from Trump. The filmmakers were given access to restricted areas of the ballot-counting operation, including the secure area where ballots were stored.

The review’s integrity took another hit when former Secretary of State Ken Bennett, a Republican whose experience in elections lent credibilit­y to the operation, found himself locked out of the building where the audit was underway because he’d given outside election experts data without authorizat­ion, he said.

Bennett told a conservati­ve talk-radio host that he was quitting because he was expected to rubber-stamp the findings. Later the same day, he said he was not quitting after all. Senate President Karen Fann, a Republican, agreed Bennett “will have full access to all audit work spaces, procedures, and data.”

When the Cyber Ninjas’ hand count of ballots didn’t match the county’s official tally, a third count was ordered, this time using paper-counting machines to tally the number of ballots but not the winning candidates. The findings have not been released.

Meanwhile, the timeline for a final report, recently expected in late July, has continued slipping.

Supporters of the effort blame stonewalli­ng by Maricopa County. The county’s Republican leaders refuse to cooperate, saying “competent auditors” have everything they would need to fully review the vote count.

“It is unfortunat­e that the county has been recalcitra­nt,” Republican Sen. Warren Petersen, chair of the Judiciary Committee that issued subpoenas, said recently. “That doesn’t breed trust. It slows things down. It makes things difficult.”

Twitter this week suspended audit-related accounts. A Twitter spokespers­on said the accounts were suspended “for violating the Twitter rules on platform manipulati­on and spam.”

The U.S. Justice Department has weighed in, warning any state that is looking to conduct an Arizona-style review that they will need to follow federal law that requires officials to retain and preserve election records, including ballot and ballot materials, for 22 months.

“The audit process and its eventual results may be utilized to undermine popular confidence in our electoral system nationwide, thereby enabling the disenfranc­hisement of millions of Americans,” said Ralph Neas, a civil rights attorney and advocate who wrote a report on the audit’s flaws for The Century Foundation. “These are existentia­l threats to our democracy and they have to be stopped in their tracks.”

 ?? Photos by Matt York / Associated Press ?? Maricopa County ballots cast in the 2020 general election are examined and recounted on May 6 by contractor­s working for Florida-based company Cyber Ninjas at Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix.
Photos by Matt York / Associated Press Maricopa County ballots cast in the 2020 general election are examined and recounted on May 6 by contractor­s working for Florida-based company Cyber Ninjas at Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix.
 ??  ?? The partisan review includes a hand count of ballots, the analysis of voter data and the review of ballot machines.
The partisan review includes a hand count of ballots, the analysis of voter data and the review of ballot machines.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States