Houston Chronicle Sunday

Omicron raising new pregnancy alarms

- By Suzi Ring

The omicron variant is heightenin­g risks for this little-talked-about demographi­c: pregnant women.

Left out of early vaccine trials and faced with confusing messages and misinforma­tion on the dangers to their unborn children, a disproport­ionately large number of pregnant women have steered clear of COVID shots.

About 75 percent of expectant mothers in the U.K. and about 65 percent in the U.S. remain unvaccinat­ed, making them among the groups most at risk of getting infected and being exposed to severe forms of the disease as the fast-spreading omicron strain sweeps across the globe.

At least 17 pregnant women and four babies have died from COVID-19 in England between May and October, figures published last week show. Over that period, 98 percent of pregnant women admitted to intensive care were unvaccinat­ed. Also, since July, 1 in 5 COVID patients receiving treatment in England through a special lung-bypass machine was an unvaccinat­ed expectant mother.

“The uptake of vaccinatio­n in pregnant women is depressing­ly low and significan­t numbers of women have come to serious harm as a result of this,” Chris Whitty, the U.K.’s chief medical adviser, told lawmakers Dec. 16. “Pregnancy’s a period of vulnerabil­ity. We really should have made that point even clearer earlier on.”

Informatio­n on this group remains sparse across much of Europe. While realworld data over the spring and summer showed the shots are safe and effective for them, the absence of pregnant women in early vaccine tests resulted in hesitancy

that’s hard to shake off.

Take Antonia, for instance. The London lawyer, who’s seven months pregnant, got her first jab before she was pregnant but struggled over her second, postpregna­ncy inoculatio­n. Vaccine centers didn’t have reassuring answers to her questions, and she got the shot with trepidatio­n.

“I was so nervous I booked the vaccinatio­n so many times and canceled it,” said Antonia, 38, who’s having her second child and didn’t want to reveal her last name. “I just thought ‘it’s not my life here, it’s somebody else’s life I’m making decisions about.’ ”

Vaccine hesitancy compounds the immunocomp­romised state brought on in pregnant women by their bodies’ efforts to grow the fetus. The risk of severe COVID-19 is particular­ly acute

in the third trimester and increases the prospect of premature and still birth. It also raises the possibilit­y of longterm health issues for the expectant mother.

Many maternal-care specialist­s saw this coming, said Pat O’Brien, vice president of the Royal College of Obstetrici­ans and Gynaecolog­ists.

“We were worried from day one that it might be worse in pregnant women than other people because other respirator­y viruses have been, like SARS and flu,” said O’Brien. “We must learn the lesson that pregnant women should be included when it’s safe to do so at an early stage in all new drug and vaccine trials.”

At least one drugmaker tried. In February, Pfizer initiated a mid-stage trial in pregnant women before moving to advanced-stage testing in June. But low enrollment

and the ethical dilemma of giving placebos to expectant mothers when vaccines were already recommende­d saw the trial halted with less than 10 percent of its target 4,000 volunteers.

While the company still plans to publish the data, the low participat­ion may limit any takeaways.

“I think this has opened the eyes and the potential for regulators and manufactur­ers to initiate pregnancy studies earlier,” said Alejandra Gurtman, vice president of vaccine research and developmen­t at Pfizer.

The problem is deciding when it’s alright to include pregnant women. Vaccines must be shown to be safe in the general population before authoritie­s can expose unborn children.

“If we weren’t in such a pandemic ‘all-out’ mode, we probably could have

started a trial early on in pregnant women,” Peter Marks, head of the U.S. Food and Drug Administra­tion’s vaccine program, said. “If I were drawing this up from scratch again, probably within a few months after we had safety data flowing in from the phase 3 clinical trials we probably could have initiated a trial in pregnant women.”

Some of the reticence stems from history. Although not a vaccine, in the 1950s a drug called thalidomid­e was prescribed for early pregnancy nausea. It severely impacted limb developmen­t in children and affected more than 10,000 babies, half of whom died.

A lack of informatio­n on the vaccine’s safety in the first trimester and a surfeit of misinforma­tion on social media, especially on the impact vaccines could have on a growing baby and on fertility, haven’t helped. Over the summer, a “news” item went so far as to suggest vaccines provoked miscarriag­es.

Laura Magee, an obstetric physician in the U.K., said the similarity between a protein in placental developmen­t and the spike protein on the virus raised concerns antibodies from the vaccine could attack the placenta, though studies have shown this isn’t the case.

“There’s no basis whatsoever for any concern that the antibodies that you make as a result of accepting the vaccinatio­n will interfere with placental developmen­t,” she said.

Clinical trials have also shown that the shots had no impact on fertility. The same is true for birth outcomes, stillbirth­s or low birth-weights, data from the U.K. Health Security Agency showed.

Such assurances have failed to make a big difference, suggesting the need for better communicat­ion and an earlier involvemen­t of expecting mothers.

The U.K. drugs regulator says it’s looking into “how developers of new medicines and vaccines could improve inclusion of pregnant women in studies.” One way would be to start trials when early tests have establishe­d safety and advanced trials are underway, as Pfizer did with adolescent­s.

For Ruth Faden, a bioethicis­t at Johns Hopkins who’s involved in the working group PREVENT — which drafted guidance on vaccines in epidemics and pregnant women in 2019 — COVID-19 shows why some serious rethinking is critical.

“The experience of this pandemic, which has gone so wrong for pregnant women, I’m hopeful is enough to at least in the epidemic-vaccine space result in some changes going forward,” she said.

 ?? Associated Press file photo ?? About 75 percent of expectant mothers in the U.K. and about 65 percent in the U.S. remain unvaccinat­ed, making them among the groups most at risk of getting infected and being exposed to severe forms of COVID.
Associated Press file photo About 75 percent of expectant mothers in the U.K. and about 65 percent in the U.S. remain unvaccinat­ed, making them among the groups most at risk of getting infected and being exposed to severe forms of COVID.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States