Houston Chronicle Sunday

Value of Fox News

-

Conservati­ve thought

Regarding “Editorial: Tucker Carlson's hate sells. After Buffalo shooting, who's still buying ‘replacemen­t theory?' ” (May 16): I find it laughable that you are begging readers not to watch Tucker Carlson. Do you not realize that you are the reason we all watch Tucker Carlson? You refuse to report the news in a fair, balanced way, so we have no choice but to watch Fox News to get the other side of the story.

Bernie Weber, Katy

Could it be that Tucker Carlson speaks inconvenie­nt truths that the Chronicle and others are too closedmind­ed to accept?

Jack Gibbs, Hempstead

Tucker Carlson responded on his show to the criticism he has received with regard to the so-called replacemen­t theory. Carlson provided many examples, video and text of talking heads and politician­s discussing the impact of providing citizenshi­p to the millions of undocument­ed people on voting demographi­cs. Carlson also provided a column in the New York Times that even used the word “replacemen­t” in the title. If the editorial board would have taken time to do actual research instead on relying on reports by others they would have found that the evidence is contrary to what the editorial espoused.

David Keller, Houston

Regarding “Trend not conservati­ve — it's autocratic,” (May 16): Michael Taylor's exceptiona­lly cogent analysis demands that we understand our Constituti­on, and that in particular we focus on the complicate­d functions of the First Amendment. Amid too many confusing cries and overwrough­t protestati­ons about preserving American freedoms, we keep missing a key axiom of liberty, namely that it cannot exist without matching responsibi­lity. Without responsibi­lity, freedoms degenerate into the license for anarchy.

A similar axiom, often noted, is that we can never have peace without also ensuring justice. So likewise, we will never deserve our freedoms without also tying them to our responsibi­lities. The corollary is that we won't ever deserve free speech without assuring responsibl­e speech. To shout “Fire!” in the crowded theater is plainly irresponsi­ble speech. Yet, even now we face an awkwardly designed and poorly managed cyber theater. Here, fomented and poisoned by incendiary and irresponsi­ble hate speech, members of a panicked and misinforme­d online mob clamor and threaten to harm the innocent and the law-abiding in the real world.

And even now, when individual­s and corporatio­ns speak freely, rightly and responsibl­y, public officials autocratic­ally try to punish them or slander them with irresponsi­ble speech. As Taylor points out, “Our system depends on (these bad actors) getting slapped down ...” It is high time for us to exercise our prerogativ­e for responsibl­e democratic action.

Robert F. Forker, Houston

Regarding “Opinions: Conservati­ves, let's keep winning, not fight each other,” (May 7): I read and reread Anthony Holm's piece and found his premise to be confusing: Are not “conservati­ves” supposed to “conserve?” How can you be conservati­ve if you do not advocate for conserving the rule of law, the U.S. Constituti­on, America's greatest asset (human capital), America's lifeblood of human capital (immigratio­n), the very planet that we inhabit, voting rights for everyone and a woman's reproducti­ve rights — to name just a few examples.

Thomas R. Temple, Houston

Inspiratio­nal

Regarding “UTHealth grad, 80, earns nation's first doctorate in health informatic­s after sister's misdiagnos­is,” (May 13): I greatly appreciate­d reading about the achievemen­ts of Joe Bridges regarding using artificial intelligen­ce to reduce diagnostic errors as he earned his doctoral degree. I am nearly as old as him, and his story inspired me keep going as I try to improve health care through my patient safety advocacy. I was also inspired because, like Bridges, I had a family member seriously harmed due to a missed diagnosis. In the case of my family member, the victim died. Finally, I am inspired because it is so easy to sit back and cruise through our final years, thinking we earned a rest. Bridge's story inspired me to treasure my last years and my accumulate­d knowledge as an opportunit­y to leave a legacy of help for future generation­s. Inspired, indeed.

John T. James, Houston

 ?? Janos Kummer/TNS file photo ?? Readers defend controvers­ial Fox News commentato­r Tucker Carlson.
Janos Kummer/TNS file photo Readers defend controvers­ial Fox News commentato­r Tucker Carlson.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States