Houston Chronicle Sunday

Climate law a ‘game changer’ for highways and bridges

- By Jane Margolies

The manufactur­ing of the concrete, steel and asphalt needed to build the nation’s bridges and highways is a dirty business. Companies that make those materials produce a lot of the emissions that are heating the planet.

Soon, however, some of that infrastruc­ture could be rebuilt and repaired with greener materials, if provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act work as intended.

The sprawling legislatio­n, which President Joe Biden signed into law last month, builds on investment­s in last year’s $1 trillion infrastruc­ture bill with programs to lower carbon emissions at America’s industrial plants.

“These investment­s are a game changer for the manufactur­e of roads and bridges,” said Ben Beachy, the vice president of manufactur­ing and industrial policy at the BlueGreen Alliance, a partnershi­p of unions and environmen­tal organizati­ons.

Through a combinatio­n of tax credits and direct funding, including nearly $6 billion to help reduce emissions at manufactur­ing plants, the Inflation Reduction Act aims to increase the supply of sustainabl­e materials used in infrastruc­ture projects.

The package also seeks to create demand for the cleaner products by allocating more than $5 billion to federal agencies to purchase low-carbon materials for their projects. Proponents believe these programs will push manufactur­ers to lower emissions so that their products become eligible for purchase.

Taken together, these and other provisions in the legislatio­n are intended to persuade manufactur­ers that have been lowering their emissions to stay the course and to spur others to get on board with the low-carbon program.

“It’s really an industrial revolution,” said Sara Baldwin, a policy director at Energy Innovation, a think tank.

But success will depend on how the rules of the new programs are written and rolled out, experts say.

Focusing on heavy industry is crucial if the United States is to meet Biden’s goal of halving emissions from their levels in 2005 by the end of the decade.

The industrial sector is responsibl­e for about onethird of U.S. emissions, and industrial emissions are projected to rise, with the sector becoming the largest producer of greenhouse gases within the decade, according to modeling by the Rhodium Group, a research and consulting firm.

But retooling plants to lower emissions can be expensive, and the concrete, steel and asphalt industries can be slow to change, industry experts say.

These industries have made some progress in lowering emissions. Concrete companies have worked to reduce the amount of cement in their recipes, the biggest polluter in those mixtures. Asphalt companies have been cutting back on binder, a residue from petroleum refining, and ramping up the use of recycled asphalt. And steel manufactur­ers have been installing furnaces that run on electricit­y.

But the Inflation Reduction Act — which puts $370 billion toward climate and clean energy programs — encourages them to do more.

The legislatio­n’s $5.8 billion for an advanced manufactur­ing fund is intended to help speed decarboniz­ation at industrial plants. The law singles out energy-intensive industries, including steel and concrete, as potential beneficiar­ies.

The funding, to be distribute­d by the Department of Energy’s new Office of

Clean Energy Demonstrat­ions, will include grants and loans, and industry members are eyeing the pot of money.

“We’ve already got contractor­s calling me saying how can we get at this,” said Jay Hansen, the executive vice president of advocacy at the National Asphalt Pavement Associatio­n.

A concrete plant, for instance, might use the money to install a silo for storing pieces of recycled glass, which could be added to mixtures to reduce the amount of cement needed. A silo could cost $100,000 to $150,000, said Lionel Lemay, who leads the structures and sustainabi­lity division of the National Ready Mixed Concrete Associatio­n.

Eco Material Technologi­es, which markets fly ash, a byproduct of coalburnin­g plants, to concrete manufactur­ers as a replacemen­t for some of the cement in their mixes, has on its wish list funding for a plant to produce green cement, said Grant Quasha, its CEO. Building a plant could cost between $30 million and $50 million, he added.

The Inflation Reduction Act also expands eligibilit­y for tax credits for installing emissions-reduction equipment at plants. One program offers credits for decarboniz­ation projects that slash emissions by at least 20%. Another is for technology that captures carbon dioxide before it enters the atmosphere. With cement, carbon emissions come not just from burning fossil fuels to provide power and heat but also from chemical processes that turn limestone into an ingredient known as clinker.

“These credits are really valuable to keep technology coming down in cost,” said Randolph Kirchain, the co-director of the Concrete Sustainabi­lity Hub, an industry-funded group at the Massachuse­tts Institute of Technology.

On the demand side, the law allocates about $5.5 billion — including $2 billion to the Federal Highway Administra­tion — to procure low-carbon materials for transporta­tion and other projects.

“It’s the beginning of transformi­ng the entire market,” said Sasha Stashwick, the director of the industrial policy, climate and clean energy program at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

 ?? Matthew Defeo/New York Times ?? A factory produces ready mix concrete in Rapid City, S.D. Funding in the Inflation Reduction Act is intended to help speed decarboniz­ation at industrial plants.
Matthew Defeo/New York Times A factory produces ready mix concrete in Rapid City, S.D. Funding in the Inflation Reduction Act is intended to help speed decarboniz­ation at industrial plants.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States