Houston Chronicle Sunday

Is neck treatment by a chiropract­or safe?

- By Dana G. Smith

Going to a chiropract­or has become an accepted part of medical care, with about 15% of adults in the United States visiting one every year. Although critics claim the field lacks scientific validity, chiropract­ic treatments provide many people with pain relief, and a vast majority take place without incident.

But given the delicate nature of the spine — particular­ly the upper vertebrae of the neck — the consequenc­es of complicati­ons can be devastatin­g. One injury in particular, arterial dissection, in which blood vessels that supply blood from the heart to the brain are torn, is of high concern. In some cases, a patient may be unaware that an injury has occurred and the damage heals on its own. In others, a tear in the artery wall can cause a clot to form and result in a stroke and even death.

It is unclear how common the complicati­on is following chiropract­ic care — one estimate says that an arterial dissection occurs in 1 out of 1,000 neck manipulati­ons, another says 1 in 5.8 million (three of the four authors on that study worked for chiropract­ic associatio­ns).

Because of the severity of the injury, though, many spine specialist­s warn that chiropract­ic manipulati­on of the neck can be dangerous. Here’s what to know if you’re considerin­g the treatment for your neck pain.

The risks

Chiropract­ic manipulati­ons involve high velocity, low amplitude movements of the spine. “We take the joint to its limited range, and we do a very quick push on that joint — that’s the high velocity aspect,” said William Lauretti, a professor of integrated chiropract­ic therapies at Northeast College of Health Sciences and a spokespers­on for the American Chiropract­ic Associatio­n. “But we’re moving it for a very, very small range — that’s the low amplitude.”

The concern over arterial tears is specific to manipulati­ons of the neck. That’s partly because

the neck is more mobile and thus more susceptibl­e to injury; the torso is protected by the ribs, so the lower back doesn’t rotate as much. Major arteries that distribute blood from the heart to the brain are also threaded through the neck vertebrae, making the blood vessels there more vulnerable.

“When you turn the neck side to side, those vessels will rotate within the bone,” said Dr. Betsy Grunch, a neurosurge­on based in Gainesvill­e, Georgia. “If you turn your head quickly or rotate quickly, like a car accident or manual manipulati­on or sport, the vessel can get abruptly torqued.”

The most common symptoms of an arterial dissection are headaches, dizziness and vertigo; weakness, numbness or paralysis on one side can also occur.

In a widely publicized case last year, a 28-year-old graduate student at Georgia Southern University named Caitlin Jensen became dizzy and nauseated after a chiropract­or manipulate­d her neck. The chiropract­or called 911 and, at the hospital, doctors determined Jensen had tears in four blood vessels, resulting in a stroke and cardiac arrest.

Several studies have shown the risk of arterial dissection and

stroke to be three to 12 times higher in people who’ve recently had a neck manipulati­on, according to a review by the American Heart Associatio­n’s Stroke Council.

To Grunch, who treats one or two patients with the injury every year, the connection is clear: “Arterial dissection is a known complicati­on of spinal manipulati­on.” So even though the risk is rare, Grunch strongly advises against having your neck manipulate­d by a chiropract­or.

Dr. Alan Hilibrand, the chief of spine surgery at the Rothman Orthopaedi­c Institute in Philadelph­ia and a former president of the Cervical Spine Research Society, said that “there’s no smoking gun” in the scientific literature tying chiropract­ors to arterial dissection­s. But, he added, “I’m very uncomforta­ble” with it, and he cautioned patients that neck manipulati­ons could be dangerous.

Unfair blame?

Many chiropract­ors dispute the claim that their treatments can cause such significan­t harm. They point to review papers that have found no link between neck manipulati­ons and arterial tears and research showing that people who visited a primary care doctor were just as likely to have a stroke in the weeks following

the appointmen­t as people who saw a chiropract­or.

Instead, they say, a visit to a chiropract­or is more often the result of an arterial dissection, not the cause of it.

“These patients have an artery that’s been injured in some way,” causing neck pain and headaches, Lauretti said. “Some of them go to their primary care doctor, some of them go to their chiropract­or. If the patient has a stroke following a visit to the chiropract­or, the chiropract­or gets blamed.”

When a patient goes to a chiropract­or for neck pain, Lauretti added, the practition­er must do a thorough examinatio­n to rule out any “red flags” before performing a neck manipulati­on.

Acknowledg­ing the vulnerabil­ity of the neck, some chiropract­ors take a more conservati­ve approach when treating the area. Philip Cordova, a chiropract­or in Houston, said that in his office, they don’t rotate the neck very far in an effort to minimize the chance of injury. Some patients also tell him, “‘I don’t want my neck adjusted,’ and that’s not a problem,” Cordova said. “We work around that.”

The risk of complicati­ons from chiropract­ic treatment of other parts of the spine is extremely low, and some research suggests that the practice is as beneficial as home exercise, physical therapy and medication. As a result, many orthopedic surgeons and neurosurge­ons — including Grunch and Hilibrand — will occasional­ly refer patients to chiropract­ors for issues that aren’t related to the neck.

“I think incorporat­ing chiropract­ic treatment as a part of a conservati­ve treatment plan is totally appropriat­e,” Grunch said.

Hilibrand agreed. “I won’t hesitate to send a patient to someone who I know,” he said. “Many of these people provide very good care.”

Other options

Accidents stemming from chiropract­ic manipulati­ons are very uncommon, but because of their potential severity, it may be best to avoid the treatment if you are experienci­ng neck pain. Fortunatel­y, there are several other options available.

The first line of treatment Hilibrand recommends is overthe-counter pain medication­s combined with physical therapy. “Eighty percent of the people with neck pain will get better after the first six weeks with just those two interventi­ons,” he said.

If pain persists, Hilibrand said you might want to consider alternativ­e therapies, like acupunctur­e or a massage technique known as myofascial release. You could even pay a visit to the chiropract­or for gentler manual therapy or traction, which involves less aggressive, more controlled stretches or movements. (In instances of spinal compressio­n, though, he said people should steer clear of chiropract­ors altogether.) Steroid injections can also be helpful in reducing pain and inflammati­on.

In some instances, surgery may be required as a last resort, but experts say that noninvasiv­e therapies can often resolve the problem. “Most patients with acute neck or acute back pain don’t need surgery,” Grunch said. “They just need a good, well-balanced conservati­ve treatment plan.”

 ?? Ina Jang/New York Times ?? Most joint manipulati­ons are safe, but one rare complicati­on can result in serious injury.
Ina Jang/New York Times Most joint manipulati­ons are safe, but one rare complicati­on can result in serious injury.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States