Houston Chronicle

Blue Bell flouted rules

But guidelines aimed to prevent foodborne illness ignored by many

- By Mark Collette

Blue Bell Creameries ignored critical parts of federal recommenda­tions aimed at preventing exactly the kind of foodborne illness that thrust the Texas institutio­n into crisis this year.

Among the most straightfo­rward: If listeria shows up in the plant, check for it in the ice cream.

The draft guidelines for fighting the bacteria inside cold food plants were published seven years ago. They were optional and have yet to be finalized but nonetheles­s provide a road map for hunting and destroying the bug.

Ice cream companies large and small have flouted the guidelines.

Blue Bell “is no better or no worse than probably 90 percent of the rest of the companies,” said Mansour Samadpour, whose IEH Laboratori­es runs testing programs and crisis consulting for food producers.

Three ice cream makers got into trouble with listeria within the last year: Snoqualmie Ice Cream in Washington state, Jeni’s Splendid Ice Creams in Ohio and the much larger Blue Bell. It’s among the top purveyors of frozen treats in the United States. Of the other big companies, Unilever, which makes Breyers and Ben & Jerry’s, declined to say whether it follows the 2008 guidance. Nestlé S.A., which produces Häagen-Dazs and Dreyers, also wouldn’t say. Wells Enterprise­s Inc., maker of Blue Bunny, didn’t return messages.

The 2008 document, called “Guidance for In-

dustry: Control of Listeria monocytoge­nes in Refrigerat­ed or Frozen Ready-To-Eat Foods,” laid out a plan to attack one of the most ubiquitous and pernicious microbes in the environmen­t. It lives in soil and animal feed. Refrigerat­ion provides little deterrent to growth. It survives freezing. Once it enters a plant, it’s so hard to remove that, in extreme cases, entire facilities have been demolished to eliminate it.

When companies use the guidelines, they find that they work.

After the Nebraska Department of Agricultur­e found listeria in a random sample of Jeni’s, the CEO instituted a monitoring program as stringent as what the FDA prescribed in 2008. After destroying product worth $2 million and spending hundreds of thousands on thorough cleanings and plant upgrades, the company again found listeria in its product June 12 — illustrati­ng the pathogen’s resiliency. But this time, Jeni’s caught it before it left the plant.

“While we would most certainly prefer that listeria never enter our facility, we do take solace in the fact that our protocols and testing have worked,” CEO John Lowe wrote.

Blue Bell now is trying to follow suit, committed to becoming “first-in-class with respect to all aspects of the manufactur­e of safe, delicious ice cream products,” spokesman Joe Robertson said in an email. It now has a team of microbiolo­gists and, like Jeni’s, will test and hold its ice cream until proven safe, once production resumes. He said the company “always tried to do the right thing to produce high-quality, safe products,” but pending lawsuits in the listeria outbreak prevented him from discussing whether Blue Bell previously followed any aspects of the 2008 guidance.

The FDA recommende­d that even the smallest companies regularly test food contact surfaces and the food itself for listeria. That may seem like an obvious strategy, but industry and consumer advocates have long fought over it.

FDA records show that Blue Bell had written plans to test its plant environmen­ts for pathogens. But they didn’t include sampling the surfaces that come into contact with food or the food itself, or finding the root cause of the contaminat­ion. From 2013 to early 2015, Blue Bell found listeria on drains, floors, pallets, hoses, catwalks and surfaces near the equipment that fills containers. But it never looked for listeria in the ice cream.

Bug in the system

Mandatory microbial testing on plant surfaces and in food has long been viewed by industry groups as a one-size-fits-all approach that doesn’t work and costs too much, especially for small producers. Some have deemed it unnecessar­y when there are controls — like pasteuriza­tion — that kill pathogens. But consumer advocates say those arguments veil a deeper objection: Companies know that if they test for bugs, they will find them, and if they find them, the law says they must act.

If Blue Bell had followed the 2008 guidance, the first listeria positive would have set off an intense hunt for the source and likely triggered recalls or stopped shipment of potentiall­y tainted products.

“Let’s give them the benefit of the doubt and say they didn’t get the memo on this listeria guidance,” said Sandra Eskin, director of food safety for The Pew Charitable Trusts. “They tested and they found it. … If you find something, you can’t just ignore it.”

Two lobbying groups — the Grocery Manufactur­ers Associatio­n and the Internatio­nal Dairy Foods Associatio­n — sought to prevent the FDA from passing mandatory testing for all food plants as part of the Food Safety Modernizat­ion Act, a sweeping reform enacted in 2011 but still under implementa­tion.

The FDA struck a kind of middle ground. The new measures will allow food companies to decide when, what and how to test, if at all, but it will be harder to escape responsibi­lity for not testing should they ship tainted products.

Eskin said ice cream makers won’t be able to say that they didn’t need to test for listeria because the language isn’t mandatory.

“There’s going to be a lot more research on ice cream, but that would be a hard argument to make,” Eskin said.

It will hinge on what the FDA defines as a “significan­t hazard,” and in light of recent outbreaks, listeria is now an obvious one. Blue Bell ice cream has been linked to 10 hospitaliz­ations, including three deaths.

The list of foods at “high risk” for pathogens continues to grow, a fact that exasperate­s Samadpour. Peanuts and peanut butter, for example, weren’t on the radar until a series of outbreaks that caused hundreds of illnesses beginning in 2007.

“The way the food industry operates, they have an assumption that any food is safe until proven otherwise,” he said, noting that outbreaks of foodborne illness get detected by chance — Blue Bell’s was discovered only because South Carolina of- ficials randomly tested ice cream early this year. “At what point are we going to say … no food is safe?”

Nothing foolproof

The ultimate stopgap — testing food before it gets shipped — isn’t foolproof. The only way to detect everything is to test everything, which is impossible because the tests destroy the product. But Samadpour points to advances in the ground beef industry, which caused E.coli O157 infections to drop by half since 1997. After regulators declared the bacteria an unlawful “adulterant,” the industry ramped up testing.

Other food manufactur­ers balk at the cost, but there is a price either way. The FDA estimated the Food Safety Modernizat­ion Act will cost the food industry $471 million a year, while foodborne illness costs the nation $2 billion. Samadpour and Eskin said

once implemente­d, testing costs will fall dramatical­ly.

Even smaller producers have found that it’s worth the trade-off to take on the higher cost of stringent safety regimens. Listeria in Snoqualmie Ice Cream hospitaliz­ed two patients last year and forced the company to recall nearly all of its ice cream made in 2014. The plant outside Seattle closed for a month. Now, owner Barry Bettinger said he

operates with intense focus on sanitation from the milk crates that arrive at the plant, to testing surfaces and food, and holding products before shipping.

“One thing about food safety is it doesn’t regard the size of your company,” said Samadpour, who was hired by Snoqualmie. “You can be a tiny company and kill 50 people.”

 ?? Mayra Beltrán / Houston Chronicle ?? Microbiolo­gist Juanita Sumpter tests for salmonella in the microbiolo­gy lab at the Houston Health and Human Services Department last week.
Mayra Beltrán / Houston Chronicle Microbiolo­gist Juanita Sumpter tests for salmonella in the microbiolo­gy lab at the Houston Health and Human Services Department last week.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States