Houston Chronicle

‘CARTEL LAND’ SHINES LIGHT ON VIGILANTES

Documentar­y looks at steps groups take to exact justice

- By Manohla Dargis NEW YORK TIMES

Director Matthew Heineman has a terrific eye. And, to judge from “Cartel Land,” his immersive documentar­y about American and Mexican vigilante groups, he also has guts and nerves of steel. Serving as the primary cinematogr­apher, he employs a run-and-gun style for much of the movie, using a lightweigh­t digital camera that at times lurches so dramatical­ly that you can visualize the body attached to it. Considerin­g that Heineman landed in a few shootouts while making this documentar­y, both his camera moves and its pictorial quality are striking.

What those images show is where this documentar­y gets complicate­d. In “Cartel Land,” Heineman puts you into two outwardly similar vigilante groups, one in the United States and the other in Mexico, that seem to be battling a common enemy in the drug cartels. Each has a (more or less) charismati­c leader — Tim Foley, with the Arizona

Border Recon; and Dr. José Manuel Mireles, with Autodefens­a, a group in the state of Michoacán — who serves as his group’s mouthpiece and as a narrative hinge. “They’re the ones terrorizin­g their own country,” Foley says of the cartels, “and now they’re starting to do it over here.” Mireles, in turn, asks, “Do we want to die tied up like animals or dismembere­d like they have been doing for more than 12 years?”

Given how Heineman introduces Mireles — with a ghastly story about a murdered family and an image of three severed human heads — these questions about selfprotec­tion may sound reasonable and necessary. You may know enough about Mexican drug traffickin­g to appreciate Mireles’ questions; and you may also have strong ethical and political views on vigilantis­m. Yet the film moves so quickly and fluidly and with such unnerving violence that it doesn’t give you much time or space to think through the serious, urgent issues it raises. When you’re confronted with an image of human heads lined up as if they were at a fruit stand or a woman tearfully describing the barbaric murder of a baby, it can be difficult to get past the shock and horror. The dead become the only argument.

It takes a long time before Heineman introduces anyone who voices objections to the logic, politics and practice of vigilantis­m. For much of the movie, he switches between Foley and Mireles, who register as very different men with distinctiv­e methods, manners, lives and presentati­onal styles. What they share is proficienc­y with guns, a certain swagger and a similar justificat­ion for their groups: The cartels are terrorizin­g us, the government isn’t protecting us and we need to fight back. Foley and Mireles never meet on screen, but the editing joins them, turning the men into a united front. And because they more or less have the floor, as it were, throughout the movie, it becomes a platform for their beliefs.

Heineman has said that he wanted “Cartel Land” to feel like a narrative film as much as possible, and to an extent it does. It opens with a grabber, features juicy characters and has a discernibl­e story arc, tremendous momentum and a musical score that too often accentuate­s the obvious. What’s missing is a directoria­l point of view, including about vigilante groups, the socalled war on drugs, and Mexican and U.S. policies and politics. When Foley mentions, for instance, that the Southern Poverty Law Center has labeled his organizati­on an extremist group, the comment simply hangs there. Heineman doesn’t ask Foley if the charge has justificat­ion or press him on whether that plays into why he trains his sights on the border. Heineman just keeps shooting, running and gunning.

 ?? The Orchard ?? Dr. José Manuel Mireles heads a vigilante group in Mexico in “Cartel Land.”
The Orchard Dr. José Manuel Mireles heads a vigilante group in Mexico in “Cartel Land.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States