PolitiFact: What did Obama mean when he said ISIS was “contained”?
Last week President Barack Obama said the Islamic State is “contained,” a comment that has been scrutinized in the wake of the deadly attacks in Paris that have been attributed to the terrorist group.
But has Obama’s comment been taken out of context?
“ABC This Week” host George Stephanopoulos presented White House Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes with a list of politicians criticizing Obama for his Nov. 12 remarks. Republican presidential candidate and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, for example, said Obama sees the world “as a fantasy.”
Rhodes said Obama was talking about a particular aspect of containment that in no way dismissed the possibility of terrorist attacks in the West.
“The president was responding very specifically to the geographic expansion of ISIL in Iraq and Syria,” Rhodes said, using another acronym for the group. “A year ago, we saw them on the march in Iraq and Syria, taking more and more population centers. The fact is that we have been able to stop that geographic advance and take back significant amounts of territory in both northern Iraq and northern Syria. At the same time, that does not diminish the fact that there is a threat posed by ISIL, not just in those countries but in their aspirations to project power overseas.”
In the context of Obama’s Thursday interview with Stephanopoulos — the day before the Paris attacks — it actually is quite clear that when he says ISIS is contained, he is talking about ISIS’ territorial expansion in Syria and Iraq. Here are the relevant parts of the interview:
Stephanopoulos: “Some of your critics say, even your friendly critics say, like Fareed Zakaria, that what you have on the ground now is not going to be enough. Every couple of months you’re going to be faced with the same choice of back down or double down.”
Obama: “I think what is true is that this has always been a multiyear project precisely because the governance structures in the Sunni areas of Iraq are
weak, and there are none in Syria. And we don’t have ground forces there in sufficient numbers to simply march into Raqqa in Syria and clean the whole place out. And as a consequence, we’ve always understood that our goal has to be militarily constraining ISIL’s capabilities, cutting off their supply lines, cutting off their financing at the same time as we’re putting a political track together in Syria and fortifying the best impulses in Baghdad so that we can, not just win militarily, but also win by improving governance.”
Stephanopoulos: “And that’s the strategy you’ve been following. But ISIS is gaining strength, aren’t they?”
Obama: “Well, no, I don’t think they’re gaining strength. What is true is
that from the start, our goal has been first to contain, and we have contained them. They have not gained ground in Iraq. And in Syria they’ll come in, they’ll leave. But you don’t see this systematic march by ISIL across the terrain. What we have not yet been able to do is to completely decapitate their command and control structures. We’ve made some progress in trying to reduce the flow of foreign fighters.”
When Obama said, “we have contained them,” it’s within a plainly defined scope: ISIS’ territorial ambitions in Iraq and Syria. This context is bolstered by the fact that Stephanopoulos asks Obama about the ground efforts in those two countries.
He wasn’t saying, as critics have shorthanded, that ISIS no longer presents a threat — an assertion that the Paris attacks would have negated. In fact, in the same interview, Obama acknowledged that ISIS may have surpassed al-Qaida as the greatest terror threat in the world, adding that they are constantly looking for “a crack in the system” to exploit to carry out attacks.
Is ISIS contained in Iraq and Syria?
The region Obama refers to is significant because it’s the epicenter of ISIS’s caliphate. We surveyed a number of experts, and they all said Obama is accurate when he says ISIS hasn’t gained territory in Iraq and Syria in recent months, though it does not give a full picture of ISIS’s global reach.
While ISIS has captured a couple towns in the past few months, it ultimately has lost roughly a quarter of its Iraq and Syria territory overall. A good portion of the losses resulted from United States air strikes, but also from fighting with Iraqi forces and regional groups, said Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. This is a far cry from a year ago, when there was serious concern that ISIS would capture Baghdad.
Even though it has not expanded territorially recently, ISIS continues to counterattack anti-ISIS forces in the region, noted Frederick Kagan, director of the Critical Threats Project at the American Enterprise Institute. He added that ISIS has actually expanded globally, with strongholds and cells in Libya, Yemen, the Sinai region, and Bangladesh, as well as establishing ties with other terrorist organizations in Africa. And, as we know from the Paris attacks, ISIS is able to flex its muscle in the West, too.
“They are being contained geographically by traditional military but they are leapfrogging over it using terrorism,” said Joshua Landis, director of the Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Oklahoma.
Our ruling
Rhodes said that when Obama said ISIS was contained, he “was responding very specifically to the geographic expansion of ISIL in Iraq and Syria.”
Looking back at Obama’s interview where he made this comment, it is quite clear that it’s within a narrowly defined scope: ISIS territorial expansion in Iraq and Syria. He did not rule out the potential for a terrorist attack, and he also made it clear that the United States’ anti-ISIS efforts are a work in progress.
References or suggestions that Obama claimed ISIS no longer presents an active threat are incorrect.
Rhodes’ statement rates True.