Houston Chronicle

Members of Congress reach a bipartisan deal to revamp the regulation of chemicals.

- By Matthew Daly

WASHINGTON — A bipartisan agreement reached by House and Senate negotiator­s would set new safety standards for asbestos and other dangerous chemicals, including tens of thousands that have gone unregulate­d for decades.

A bill to be voted on as soon as next week would offer new protection­s for pregnant women, children, workers and others vulnerable to the effects of chemicals such as formaldehy­de and styrene used in homes and businesses every day.

If enacted into law, the bill would be the first significan­t update to the Toxic Substances Control Act since the law was adopted in 1976.

The bill, more than three years in the making, has won the backing of both industry officials and some of the Capitol’s most liberal lawmakers, including Sens. Barbara Boxer of California and Edward Markey of Massachuse­tts.

The bill also has the support of conservati­ve Republican­s such as Sens. David Vitter of Louisiana and James Inhofe of Oklahoma.

“This is a political Halley’s Comet” that may not be seen again for many years, said Markey, a former foe of the bill who signed onto it after changes were made to ensure that states that regulate chemicals closely can continue to do so.

Markey called the bill “a special piece of legislatio­n” that finally updates one of the major environmen­tal laws approved during the 1970s.

The agreement announced Thursday merges bills that the House and Senate passed last year.

Negotiatio­ns had stalled in recent weeks, as lawmakers struggled over a provision that allows states to continue regulating toxic chemicals. The proposal announced Thursday declares that any state law or rule in place before April 22 would not be preempted by federal law. The proposal also would allow states to work on regulation­s while federal rules are being developed, a process that can take years.

Boxer, who had opposed earlier versions of the bill, said the proposal protects the rights of California and other states that aggressive­ly regulate chemicals “to continue their critical work to protect their citizens from harmful toxic chemicals.” States that do not regulate chemicals closely would follow the federal standard.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said Thursday that the measure “goes a long way to providing businesses with much needed clarity and certainty by facilitati­ng a more predictabl­e federal regulatory program” for chemicals.

Richard Denison, a senior scientist for the Environmen­tal Defense Fund, called the bill a “significan­t victory for public health,” noting that it will require safety reviews for thousands of chemicals already in use and mandate greater scrutiny of new chemicals before they can be sold.

Chemicals used in everyday products such as household cleaners, clothing and furniture have been linked to serious illnesses, including cancer, infertilit­y, diabetes and Parkinson’s disease. Under current law, only a small fraction of chemicals used in these products have been reviewed for safety.

“People believe when they go to the grocery store or the hardware store (and) get a product, that that product has been tested and it’s been determined to be safe. That isn’t the case,” said Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., a lead sponsor of the bill. “Today we are stepping forward and we are putting a law in place that will protect American families and protect children from chemicals.”

 ?? J. Scott Applewhite / Associated Press ?? Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., embraces Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., on Thursday in Washington during a news conference to discuss bipartisan legislatio­n to improve the federal regulation of chemicals and toxic substances.
J. Scott Applewhite / Associated Press Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., embraces Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., on Thursday in Washington during a news conference to discuss bipartisan legislatio­n to improve the federal regulation of chemicals and toxic substances.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States