Houston Chronicle

Baylor’s fumble

A sex scandal reflects a loss of focus at the world’s largest Southern Baptist university.

-

“Every athlete exercises self-control in all things,” the old coach advised his Corinthian team a couple of eons ago. “They do it to receive a perishable wreath (modern translatio­n: a national championsh­ip), but we an imperishab­le one.” (I Corinthian­s 9:25)

In its years-long crusade to become the Baptist Notre Dame on the playing field, the largest Southern Baptist university in the world seems to have forgotten the Pauline admonition. Yet again, Baylor University appears to have veered off course as it attempts to navigate between the madness of big-time college sports (paying a football coach almost $6 million annually, for example) and the more becoming mien of Christian moderation envisioned by its early Texan founders more than a centuryand-a-half ago.

Thirteen years after a horrendous murder scandal that nearly destroyed the Bears’ basketball program, the university is accused of failing to respond to rapes or sexual assaults reported by at least six women students from 20092016. This time it’s the football program. At least eight former Baylor football players have been accused of violence against women since the arrival of coach Art Briles from the University of Houston in 2008.

The most successful football coach in the school’s history has come under increasing criticism, but it’s President and Chancellor Ken Starr, not Briles who, according to social-media buzz, is about to walk the plank off the top tier of McLane Stadium and into the Brazos River down below. (In a news release, Baylor complained about rumors and speculatio­n and said an announceme­nt would be forthcomin­g by June 3.)

Starr came to national prominence two decades ago as the special counsel investigat­ing the sexual shenanigan­s of then-President Bill Clinton, an investigat­ion that led to Clinton’s impeachmen­t. Ironically, it’s a sexrelated scandal that could cost him his job. He’s been at Baylor since June 2010, during which both Baylor and its Central Texas hometown have prospered mightily, in large part because of the Bears’ spectacula­r success under Briles.

It’s hard to believe that neither Briles nor Starr was unaware of accusation­s of violent behavior by football players, hard to believe they weren’t aware that Briles’ program seemed to be tolerating criminal behavior on the part of students representi­ng the university on scholarshi­p. It appears they turned a blind eye.

“Baylor’s athletic department is being accused of establishi­ng an atmosphere in which students believed football players could get away with attacking female students,” Chronicle columnist Jerome Solomon wrote last Sunday. “How sad and disgusting, particular­ly for a university that proudly waves a religious banner that is supposed to separate it from so many other heathen institutio­ns.”

In his 2015 memoir, “Beating Goliath: My Story of Football and Faith,” Briles takes pride in giving young men who make mistakes a second chance. “I know other schools aren’t necessaril­y that way,” he writes. “I’ve read plenty of reports about how some colleges run kids off if they have problems. We’ve obviously had some tough choices to make as well. I just know that the first effort is to make sure to help people as much as possible.”

Patience and forbearanc­e are, of course, admirable virtues, but there are limits, even for young men who run a 4.3 40-yard dash.

Whatever the university’s board of regents decides to do about Briles and Starr, Baylor has a duty to release in full the results of a forthcomin­g investigat­ion into how the athletic department handled reports of rape and assault allegation­s. Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Baylor grad, issued what the Waco Tribune-Herald called a “muddled May 17 opinion” regarding what the university is required to release.

“Its findings,” Solomon noted in his recent column, “won’t be flattering to the Baylor athletic department.”

If members of the Baylor family examine the report un-blinkered, they might arrive at the unhappy conclusion that a values-focused university cannot compete for that perishable wreath without losing sight of the imperishab­le. They won’t give up their gridiron crusade, of course, but they’re likely to find big-time college football a perennial thorn in the flesh. St. Paul could identify.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States