Houston Chronicle

School vaccine decisions must be well-informed

- By Steven A. Abrams and Sarmistha B. Hauger Abrams is chair of the Department of Pediatrics at the Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin. Hauger is chief of Pediatric Infectious Diseases at the Dell Children’s Medical Center of Central

Recent reports have highlighte­d the increasing rate of unvaccinat­ed children in Texas schools including those in the greater Austin area. Close to 1 percent of Texas school children, or about 45,000 students, are exempted from vaccinatio­ns for nonmedical reasons. In the Austin Independen­t School District, it is about 2 percent, or more than 1,500 students.

These numbers may sound low overall but individual schools, including private schools, may have higher numbers, with some schools’ portions of unvaccinat­ed students exceeding 10 percent. This number puts both vaccinated and unvaccinat­ed children at risk of severe and mostly preventabl­e diseases such as measles.

Much of the debate about vaccinatio­n has focused on the rights of parents to not vaccinate their school-age children. But we must also consider the rights of those who want maximum prevention against preventabl­e diseases. For example, given this concept of protection of the community from highly contagious infections, California has passed a law making it much more difficult for children to attend school if they have not been vaccinated. Perhaps Texas lawmakers ought to take notice. The American Academy of Pediatrics recently came out strongly in favor of such laws to protect schoolchil­dren. There is overwhelmi­ng evidence that vaccines do not cause autism and government officials in Texas should not be making claims to the contrary, as we saw recently with Bexar County District Attorney Nico LaHood.

As vaccinatio­n rates drop, infections increase due to loss of what is referred to as “herd immunity.” This refers to the protection a community has when a sufficient portion of the population is immune to an infectious disease because it makes its spread from person to person unlikely. Even people not vaccinated, such as infants, newborns and people with chronic illnesses, are offered some protection because the disease has little opportunit­y to spread within the community. But that protection diminishes as more of the population is unvaccinat­ed. What that number is varies from infection to infection, but in general, highly contagious diseases such as measles have a higher threshold than less contagious ones. That is why we have recently had numerous unexpected outbreaks of measles, which are related to unvaccinat­ed population­s.

In any case, what we should do is insist on full disclosure of vaccinatio­n rates at every school in the state. It is a fundamenta­l right of parents to know this informatio­n in choosing a school for their child. We need to expect that parents who sign a vaccinatio­n exemption have met with a qualified health care provider and have reviewed the risks of this practice with them. We should insist on this type of review for other medical decisions with important consequenc­es and should do so for vaccinatio­n refusal. We need to support the rights of health care providers such as Austin Regional Clinics’ recent decision to decline to have children in their offices who are not vaccinated.

We also need to recognize the real fears that parents have about the risks of vaccinatio­ns. We need to continue to support vaccine research and public informatio­n campaigns that are fact-based and culturally sensitive. We need to give pediatrici­ans and other care givers reimbursem­ent for spending extended time with families discussing vaccinatio­ns, and we need to be sure that we respect one another in the dialogue about vaccinatio­ns. It is sometimes incorrectl­y said that pediatrici­ans have a financial motivation related to vaccinatio­n. Let’s give them a financial motivation to support health through open and extended discussion­s with families about their health care decisions. That is a win for everyone and allows discussion­s about a range of vaccine decisions regarding preventabl­e diseases such as influenza and HPV, not just those ordinarily related to attending school.

Should parents send their children to a school where high numbers of children are not vaccinated? Is this something that should be factored into school choice decisions based on accurate informatio­n for that school? That’s a decision each parent must make, but for us, we would say no to the former and would not send our children to such schools.

Informed decision-making for parents and protection for our children is of the utmost importance. Let’s not erode the progress we’ve made during the past 50 years and keep preventabl­e diseases from spreading.

 ?? Houston Chronicle file ?? Vaccines protect the health and safety of schools, benefiting individual students and classmates.
Houston Chronicle file Vaccines protect the health and safety of schools, benefiting individual students and classmates.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States