Houston Chronicle

EPA should have intervened in Flint months earlier, agency’s watchdog says

- By Brady Dennis WASHINGTON POST

The inspector general for the Environmen­tal Protection Agency said Thursday that the agency should have issued an emergency order to protect residents of Flint, Mich., from lead-tainted water seven months before it did.

The agency watchdog found that the EPA had “the authority and sufficient informatio­n” to force state officials to fix the city’s escalating water problems in June 2015. But the EPA did not issue its emergency order until Jan. 21, long after it became clear that those state officials’ failure to properly treat the water had left the entire city — including thousands of young children — exposed to elevated levels of lead.

“These situations should generate a greater sense of urgency,” Inspector General Arthur Elkins said in a statement Thursday. “Federal law provides the EPA with the emergency authority to intervene when the safety of drinking water is compromise­d. Employees must be knowledgea­ble, trained and ready to act when such a public health threat looms.”

Thursday’s findings come amid a broader inquiry into the federal agency’s actions in Flint. Elkins recommende­d the EPA update its 25-year-old internal guidance on the use of that emergency authority and require drinking-water staff to attend training on when to use it.

In a contentiou­s hearing on Capitol Hill this year, EPA Administra­tor Gina McCarthy conceded that the agency was too slow to intervene in Flint’s water-contaminat­ion crisis. But she insisted that under the law, it had done all it could to protect Flint’s 95,000 residents. She refused to accept blame for the catastroph­e, instead laying the responsibi­lity on Michigan’s Republican Gov. Rick Snyder.

She said state officials “slow-walked everything they needed to do. That precluded us from doing what we had to do,” she told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Even so, Thursday’s inspector general report notes that by April 2015, the EPA “discovered that the necessary corrosion control had not been added to the community water system” after the city switched its water source to the Flint River a year earlier. By June 2015, the EPA also knew that the water in “at least four homes” in Flint had tested for lead concentrat­ions beyond the federal action level of 15 parts per billion. The agency also knew “that the state and local authoritie­s were not acting quickly to protect human health,” the inspector general found.

For decades, Flint had bought its water from Detroit. It was piped from Lake Huron, with anticorros­ion chemicals added along the way. But in early 2014, with Flint under the control of an emergency manager appointed by Snyder, officials switched to the river water in a bid to save money. The state failed to ensure that corrosion-control additives were part of the new water supply. That allowed rust, iron and, most dangerousl­y, lead from aging pipes to flow into residents’ homes.

Tens of thousands of people there still rely on bottled water to drink, bathe and cook.

 ?? Associated Press files ?? An Environmen­tal Protection Agency report says the EPA had “the authority and sufficient informatio­n” to take action much earlier in the Flint, Mich., water crisis.
Associated Press files An Environmen­tal Protection Agency report says the EPA had “the authority and sufficient informatio­n” to take action much earlier in the Flint, Mich., water crisis.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States