Houston Chronicle

A family’s defect sheds light on human genome

- By Natalie Angier |

They said it was their family curse: a rare congenital deformity called syndactyly, in which the thumb and index finger are fused together on one or both hands. Ten members of the extended clan were affected, and with each new birth, they told Dr. Stefan Mundlos of the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, the first question was always: “How are the baby’s hands? Are they normal?”

Afflicted relatives described feeling like outcasts in their village, convinced that their “strange fingers” repulsed everybody they knew — including their unaffected kin. “One woman told me that she never received a hug from her father,” Mundlos said. “He avoided her.”

The family, under promise of anonymity, is taking part in a study by Mundlos and his colleagues of the origin and developmen­t of limb malformati­ons. And while the researcher­s cannot yet offer a way to prevent syndactyly, or to entirely correct it through surgery, Mundlos has sought to replace the notion of a family curse with “a rational answer for their condition,” he said — and maybe a touch of pioneers’ pride.

The scientists have traced the family’s limb anomaly to a novel class of genetic defects unlike any seen before, a finding with profound implicatio­ns for understand­ing a raft of heretofore mysterious diseases.

The mutations affect a newly discovered design feature of the DNA molecule called topologica­lly associatin­g domains, or TADs. It turns out that the vast informatio­nal expanse of the genome is divvied up into a series of manageable, parochial and law-abiding neighborho­ods with strict nucleic partitions between them — each one a TAD.

Breach a TAD barrier, and you end up with the molecular equivalent of that famous final scene in Mel Brooks’ comedy, “Blazing Saddles,” when the cowboy actors from one movie set burst through a wall and onto the rehearsal stage of a campy Fred Astaire-style musical. Soon fists, top hats and cream pies are flying.

By studying TADs, researcher­s hope to better fathom the deep structure of the human genome, in real time and three dimensions, and to determine how a quivering, mucilagino­us string of some 3 billion chemical subunits that would measure more than six-feet long if stretched out nonetheles­s can be coiled and compressed down to four-10,000ths of an inch, the width of a cell nucleus — and still keep its operationa­l wits about it.

“DNA is a superlong molecule packed into a very small space, and it’s clear that it’s not packed randomly,” Mundlos said. “It follows a very intricate and controlled packing mechanism, and TADs are a major part of the folding protocol.”

For much of the past 50 years, genetic research has focused on DNA as a kind of computer code, a sequence of genetic “letters” that inscribe instructio­ns for piecing together amino acids into proteins, which in turn do the work of keeping us alive.

Read between the folds

Most of the genetic diseases deciphered to date have been linked to mishaps in one or another protein recipe. Scanning the DNA of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, for example, scientists have identified telltale glitches in the gene that encodes dystrophin, a protein critical to muscle stability.

At the root of Huntington’s disease, which killed the folk singer Woody Guthrie, are short, repeated bits of nucleic nonsense sullying the code for huntingtin, an important brain protein. The mutant product that results soon shatters into neurotoxic shards.

Yet researcher­s soon realized there was much more to the genome than the protein codes it enfolded. “We were caught up in the idea of genetic informatio­n being linear and one-dimensiona­l,” said Job Dekker, a biologist at the University of Massachuse­tts Medical School.

For one thing, as the sequencing of the complete human genome

revealed, the portions devoted to specifying the components of hemoglobin, collagen, pepsin and other proteins account for just a tiny fraction of the whole, maybe 3 percent of human DNA’s 3 billion chemical bases.

And there was the restless physicalit­y of the genome, the way it arranged itself during cell division into 23 spindly pairs of chromosome­s that could be stained and studied under a microscope, and then somehow, when cell replicatio­n was through, merged back together into a baffling, ever-wriggling ball of chromatin — DNA wrapped in a protective packaging of histone proteins.

Through chromosome conformati­on studies and related research, scientists have discovered the genome is organized into about 2,000 jurisdicti­ons, and they are beginning to understand how these TADs operate.

As with city neighborho­ods, TADs come in a range of sizes, from tiny walkable zones a few dozen DNA subunits long to TADs that sprawl over tens of thousands of bases and you’re better off taking the subway. TAD borders serve as folding instructio­ns for DNA. “They’re like the dotted lines on a paper model kit,” Dekker said.

TAD boundaries also dictate the rules of genetic engagement.

Scientists have long known that protein codes are controlled by an assortment of genetic switches and enhancers — noncoding sequences designed to flick protein production on, pump it into high gear and muzzle it back down again.

The new research indicates that switches and enhancers act only on those genes, those protein codes, stationed within their own precincts.

Because TADs can be quite large, the way the Upper West Side of Manhattan comprises an area of about 250 square blocks, a genetic enhancer located at the equivalent of, say, Lincoln Center on West 65th Street, can amplify the activity of a gene positioned at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine, 45 blocks north.

But under normal circumstan­ces, one thing an Upper West Side enhancer will not do is reach across town to twiddle genes residing on the Upper East Side.

“Genes and regulatory elements are like people,” Dekker said. “They care about and communicat­e with those in their own domain, and they ignore everything else.”

Breaking boundaries

What exactly do these boundaries consist of, that manage to both direct the proper folding of the DNA molecule and prevent cross talk between genes and gene switches in different domains? Scientists are not entirely sure, but preliminar­y results indicate that the boundaries are DNA sequences that attract the attention of sticky, roughly circular proteins called cohesin and CTCF, which adhere thickly to the boundary sequences like insulating tape.

Between those boundary points, those clusters of insulating proteins, the chromatin strand can loop up and over like the ribbon in a birthday bow, allowing genetic elements distribute­d along the ribbon to touch and interact with one another. But the insulating proteins constrain the movement of each chromatin ribbon, said Richard A. Young of the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, and keep it from getting entangled with neighborin­g loops — and the genes and regulatory elements located thereon.

The best evidence for the importance of TADs is to see what happens when they break down. Researcher­s have lately linked a number of disorders to a loss of boundaries between genomic domains, including cancers of the colon, esophagus, brain and blood.

In such cases, scientists have failed to find mutations in any of the protein-coding sequences commonly associated with the malignanci­es, but instead identified DNA damage that appeared to shuffle around or eliminate TAD boundaries. As a result, enhancers from neighborin­g estates suddenly had access to genes they were not meant to activate.

Reporting in the journal Science, Young and his colleagues described a case of leukemia in which a binding site for insulator proteins had been altered not far from a gene called TAL1, which if improperly activated is known to cause leukemia. In this instance, disruption of the nearby binding site, Young said, “broke up the neighborho­od and allowed an outside enhancer to push TAL1 to the point of tumorigene­sis,” the production of tumors.

Now that researcher­s know what to look for, he said, TAD disruption­s may prove to be a common cause of cancer. The same may be true of developmen­tal disorders — like syndactyly.

 ??  ??
 ?? Headcase Design via The New York Times ??
Headcase Design via The New York Times
 ?? Norbert Michalke/Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin via The New York Times ?? Stefan Mundlos of the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics helped discover a design feature of the DNA molecule called topologica­lly associatin­g domains, or TADs, that has profound implicatio­ns for understand­ing a raft of heretofore mysterious...
Norbert Michalke/Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin via The New York Times Stefan Mundlos of the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics helped discover a design feature of the DNA molecule called topologica­lly associatin­g domains, or TADs, that has profound implicatio­ns for understand­ing a raft of heretofore mysterious...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States